| 1 Apr 2024 |
 TheFrenchGhosty | In reply to @absidue:matrix.org
oh wait they already left, why ask for help if you are going to leave the room before anyone has had a chance to help? He's been asking for help for a month | 20:19:35 |
| TheFrenchGhosty | He just comes and go ask for help about different stuff every time | 20:20:17 |
 @los_mir:matrix.org | Redacted or Malformed Event | 21:09:16 |
| @los_mir:matrix.org | Redacted or Malformed Event | 21:09:46 |
| TheFrenchGhosty | YouTube will not stop serving video, they need the money | 21:13:17 |
 Samantaz Fox | los_mir there is not plans for that, sorry. | 21:16:33 |
 Midou | In reply to @thefrenchghosty:pussthecat.org
YouTube will not stop serving video, they need the money the only thing they are trying to target now is the tiktok demographic, and tiktok tries to target the youtube demographic with the long form widescreen videos now | 21:17:17 |
| TheFrenchGhosty | In reply to @midou:envs.net
the only thing they are trying to target now is the tiktok demographic, and tiktok tries to target the youtube demographic with the long form widescreen videos now YouTube short is making money now, YouTube strategy is working, creators now make a LOT more than they were making 5+ years ago | 21:18:37 |
| TheFrenchGhosty | 5 years ago it was 1€/1000 views, now it's minimum 5€/1000 views with most creators making 9-15€/1000 views | 21:19:13 |
| Midou | In reply to @thefrenchghosty:pussthecat.org
YouTube short is making money now, YouTube strategy is working, creators now make a LOT more than they were making 5+ years ago for short form videos? | 21:19:26 |
| TheFrenchGhosty | In reply to @midou:envs.net
for short form videos? no long form | 21:19:36 |
| Midou | huh | 21:19:40 |
| TheFrenchGhosty | short form is less | 21:19:49 |
| TheFrenchGhosty | I don't remember the number but it's like 10€/100 000 views I think | 21:20:04 |
| Samantaz Fox | please stay on topic, thanks! | 21:24:10 |
| Midou | Alright, I just thought talking about youtube itself is tolerated enough here :p | 21:26:44 |
 tr4ck3ur | dumb question: how do we obtain the value for the promoted fix ? is there a way to find another one, or it's just a checksum like ? | 22:26:44 |
| tr4ck3ur | sorry perhaps it has been answered befor | 22:28:35 |
| tr4ck3ur | * sorry perhaps it has been answered before | 22:28:39 |
| tr4ck3ur | at the end, just want to ensure it avoid a way to segregate through a clear identifier indeed. | 22:41:52 |
| tr4ck3ur | i'm a bit lost on how to find it, and the lack of knowledge on it, coming from the fact we can't find any RFC related, and it's not really relevant for mojor guys that build the system to own our world, but i think we should aggregate knowledge about this | 22:55:12 |
| tr4ck3ur | is it possible to reach documentation about it without any identifier ? perhaps it's the case. anyone know ? | 23:00:54 |
| Samantaz Fox | tr4ck3ur By doing a lot of research | 23:03:33 |
| Samantaz Fox | And don't expect that to be documented, it's obscure Google stuff | 23:03:57 |
| tr4ck3ur | We even know that we should build a "wikipedia" alternative as we have "some" moderators that are against LUG "linux user group" initiatives, that are trying to get it more "main stream". | 23:11:18 |
| tr4ck3ur | it's a nightmare to get a freemind nowadays | 23:12:02 |
| tr4ck3ur | sorry off-topic | 23:12:37 |
| tr4ck3ur | anyway, documentation will be a problem for the next 'update' on their side | 23:28:02 |
| tr4ck3ur | let's reword: a way of enhancement :) | 23:30:09 |
| tr4ck3ur | i really think that a "curl" command list, a script or whatever we can execute locally in few seconds will be much more efficient to share, and at the end, will release a patch for the community. from my point of view, exploratory part is missing, documentation will be a good start. | 23:36:30 |
