| 6 Apr 2024 |
 Samantaz Fox | but stripping part of the file means we'd have to intercept the "natural" way file upload is done | 16:42:27 |
| Samantaz Fox | and I hate code that break standard behaviors | 16:42:41 |
| Samantaz Fox | Ashley (she/her or per/pers) 🏳️⚧️ sorry to say that, bu LibreJS is quite a joke to me. What's not libre in current browsers' JS interpreters? The code is already open source... | 16:44:44 |
 Ashley (she/her or per/pers) 🏳️⚧️ | In reply to @samantazfox:pussthecat.org
Ashley (she/her or per/pers) 🏳️⚧️ sorry to say that, bu LibreJS is quite a joke to me. What's not libre in current browsers' JS interpreters? The code is already open source... i mean you can just make the license propriatary even the code is | 16:55:00 |
| Ashley (she/her or per/pers) 🏳️⚧️ | yk | 16:55:01 |
 @fosster:gnulinux.club | In reply to @samantazfox:pussthecat.org
Ashley (she/her or per/pers) 🏳️⚧️ sorry to say that, bu LibreJS is quite a joke to me. What's not libre in current browsers' JS interpreters? The code is already open source... sometimes the source code, even if avialable, may be highly obfuscated and can't easily tell what it does | 17:07:34 |
 TheFrenchGhosty | In reply to @fosster:gnulinux.club
sometimes the source code, even if avialable, may be highly obfuscated and can't easily tell what it does This... except if you want to use a website you will be forced to allow it to run... effectively making LibreJS pointless | 17:11:46 |
| Ashley (she/her or per/pers) 🏳️⚧️ | Samantaz Fox would it be possible to add the comments to the video endpoint itself? like recentComments or something | 17:50:20 |
| Ashley (she/her or per/pers) 🏳️⚧️ | but without the contuniation | 17:51:31 |
| TheFrenchGhosty | But why | 18:01:59 |
| Ashley (she/her or per/pers) 🏳️⚧️ | In reply to @thefrenchghosty:pussthecat.org
But why well you wouldnt need to fetch the comments endpoint as well to get the comments | 18:02:51 |
| Ashley (she/her or per/pers) 🏳️⚧️ | so that woulld be kinda faster | 18:02:57 |
| Ashley (she/her or per/pers) 🏳️⚧️ | but on a second though it will be the same speed as it still needs to fetch the comments from a diff enpoint | 18:04:37 |
| TheFrenchGhosty | In reply to @ashleyfsf:mozilla.org
well you wouldnt need to fetch the comments endpoint as well to get the comments But in exchange you will bloat the video endpoint | 18:29:23 |
| TheFrenchGhosty | So this is worse | 18:29:40 |
| Samantaz Fox | Ashley (she/her or per/pers) 🏳️⚧️ no, that's not something we'll do | 19:08:05 |
| Samantaz Fox | I think the rational is explained in the API, but just in case: the invidious endpoitns are made to match as much as possible the youtube endpoints | 19:08:53 |
| Samantaz Fox | This is mostly to reduce the "bloat" returned (e.g you probably don't want all the community posts and all videos loaded just to displaye the channel "bout" infos) and also to improve responsiveness, as we only do 1 request (sometimes 2) in the background | 19:10:03 |
| Samantaz Fox | in the API docs* | 19:10:17 |
| Samantaz Fox | "about" infos* | 19:10:45 |
|  @shadowstorm1:matrix.org joined the room. | 20:08:43 |
| @shadowstorm1:matrix.org | Redacted or Malformed Event | 20:08:50 |
| @fosster:gnulinux.club | wtf | 20:09:53 |
 @daknig:matrix.org | ah yes | 20:10:43 |
| Samantaz Fox banned @shadowstorm1:matrix.org (Spam + antisemitism). | 20:11:07 |
| Samantaz Fox | abracadaban ! | 20:11:51 |
 Meliko | Samantaz Fox: do you have any clue why uploading a file with 32002 history items might only import 26557 items to my iv instance? | 21:09:52 |
| Meliko | Could it be a maximum import limit or rather something written wrongly | 21:10:26 |
| Meliko | * Could it be a maximum import limit or rather something formatted wrongly | 21:10:35 |
| Samantaz Fox | Meliko there is not intentional limit, so it's not that. Maybe the databse struggles to ingest all that? | 21:51:01 |
