| 6 Apr 2024 |
 Samantaz Fox | No, I haven't tested it, but I looked at the code, and I can tell that we only extract the ?v=id part of it. | 16:37:46 |
| Samantaz Fox | And no, it can't be done client side, because invidious is mostly JS free | 16:38:06 |
| Samantaz Fox | that's defeat that purpose | 16:38:10 |
| Samantaz Fox | that'd* | 16:38:16 |
| Samantaz Fox | What do you mean by "default web client"? | 16:38:37 |
 @daknig:matrix.org | In reply to @samantazfox:pussthecat.org
No, I haven't tested it, but I looked at the code, and I can tell that we only extract the ?v=id part of it. ah, regex. | 16:38:41 |
| Samantaz Fox | the web client is your browser | 16:38:47 |
| @daknig:matrix.org | I guess that's what I mean then | 16:39:05 |
| @daknig:matrix.org | it's not completely js free though | 16:40:25 |
| Samantaz Fox | hence the "mostly" | 16:40:36 |
| @daknig:matrix.org | well I am not arguing, just thought we could improve the lives of users | 16:40:40 |
| Samantaz Fox | you can use all invidious features without JS | 16:40:48 |
| Samantaz Fox | But that won't improve mine xD | 16:41:01 |
| @daknig:matrix.org | "if js enabled: try to compress the thingie to reduce power usage and network traffic" | 16:41:20 |
| @daknig:matrix.org | 🤷 | 16:41:27 |
| @daknig:matrix.org | thanks for your work, I am making a gtk client :) | 16:41:43 |
 Ashley (she/her or per/pers) 🏳️⚧️ | i mean i just add librejs support to my js code | 16:41:44 |
| Ashley (she/her or per/pers) 🏳️⚧️ | if i have to use js | 16:41:48 |
| Samantaz Fox | compressing is the browser job, btw | 16:42:04 |
| @daknig:matrix.org | In reply to @samantazfox:pussthecat.org
compressing is the browser job, btw but the browser cannot know that you only use those bits | 16:42:22 |
| Samantaz Fox | but stripping part of the file means we'd have to intercept the "natural" way file upload is done | 16:42:27 |
| Samantaz Fox | and I hate code that break standard behaviors | 16:42:41 |
| Samantaz Fox | Ashley (she/her or per/pers) 🏳️⚧️ sorry to say that, bu LibreJS is quite a joke to me. What's not libre in current browsers' JS interpreters? The code is already open source... | 16:44:44 |
| Ashley (she/her or per/pers) 🏳️⚧️ | In reply to @samantazfox:pussthecat.org
Ashley (she/her or per/pers) 🏳️⚧️ sorry to say that, bu LibreJS is quite a joke to me. What's not libre in current browsers' JS interpreters? The code is already open source... i mean you can just make the license propriatary even the code is | 16:55:00 |
| Ashley (she/her or per/pers) 🏳️⚧️ | yk | 16:55:01 |
 @fosster:gnulinux.club | In reply to @samantazfox:pussthecat.org
Ashley (she/her or per/pers) 🏳️⚧️ sorry to say that, bu LibreJS is quite a joke to me. What's not libre in current browsers' JS interpreters? The code is already open source... sometimes the source code, even if avialable, may be highly obfuscated and can't easily tell what it does | 17:07:34 |
 TheFrenchGhosty | In reply to @fosster:gnulinux.club
sometimes the source code, even if avialable, may be highly obfuscated and can't easily tell what it does This... except if you want to use a website you will be forced to allow it to run... effectively making LibreJS pointless | 17:11:46 |
| Ashley (she/her or per/pers) 🏳️⚧️ | Samantaz Fox would it be possible to add the comments to the video endpoint itself? like recentComments or something | 17:50:20 |
| Ashley (she/her or per/pers) 🏳️⚧️ | but without the contuniation | 17:51:31 |
| TheFrenchGhosty | But why | 18:01:59 |
