!xJSgYiNEwxiuIfBedz:matrix.org

Governance

16 Members
Discussion around decentralized governance and governance models2 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
25 Apr 2019
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <lkngtn>

they are visible for me one one browser, but not on another. May be that default node is having some trouble.

16:16:23
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <julian>

Firefox/Debian no joy so far

16:24:16
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <julian>

‘#14’ now visible

16:25:23
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <lkngtn>

It eventually loaded for me, but from a fresh browser instance it took quite a while for anything at all to show up

16:25:32
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <julian>

here we go… :lifter:

16:26:10
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <julian>

oooh, few votes trickling in too - cool!

16:27:34
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <julian>

(possibly dumb question, apologies in advance)… How do we know which votes are which? They have different ‘#-n’ numbers now 🤔

16:30:55
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <light>

does it not look like that @julian ?

16:36:38
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <julian>

Not yet

16:40:04
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <julian>

Have reloaded page, waiting. Will upload screenshot

16:40:35
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <light>

please do! older orgs do generally take longer to load if you haven’t looked at them and cached them recently. it’s something we’re working on improving :)

16:41:11
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <julian>

How come not Bella?

16:45:22
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <light>

what about Bella?

16:47:46
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <julian>

Oh sorry, is it my org that needs to update to Bella (see screenshot) 😊

16:52:12
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <julian>

same btw atm (no text)

16:52:30
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <light>

ah right

16:54:13
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <light>

logistical challenge

16:54:21
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <light>

I think a supermajority of all ANT holders would have to approve it due to how the org is configured

16:54:42
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <julian>

@light ouch

16:56:34
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <julian>

Yay! And we’re good to go. All text present and correct. :partyparrot:

16:58:00
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <light>

look at it again, it might just be 2/3 of voters on a given upgrade, like a meta track proposal

16:58:02
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <light>

looking at it again, it might just be 2/3 of voters on a given upgrade, like a meta track proposal

16:58:18
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <julian>

@light Sounds doable

16:58:57
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <light>

yeah

16:59:12
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <light>

we should do it during a not-AGP vote

16:59:19
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <light>

so as not to confuse the voters this time

16:59:35
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <julian>

Current numbers would suggest higher voter turnout this time (obv. early doors but…)

17:02:23
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <burrrata>

Hey guys. As per AGP-1, dropping into the gov channel to share a proposal to separate Signalling from Voting.

AGPs are a wonderful tool to give the community a voice and guide Aragon’s decision making. Before submitting proposals for concrete decision making, there is often a need to gather signals from the community. This can happen in the forum, but in a heated and long term debates it’s often impractical to measure sentiment without getting overwhelmed. The Aragon community realizes this and has created an awesome signalling app.

I propose that the signalling app be updated so that it is fully functional and can included in the AGP-1 doc as part of Stage 2: preproposal. This would require all AGPs to use the signalling app to gather sentiment from the community along with current methods of forum posts and AMAs before drafting a proposal. This metric can then be taken into consideration by the AGP Editors during Stage 3: Draft.

Please share thoughts on this and/or what needs to happen from a technical perspective to make it possible. Once a more concrete plan is in place, a submission as a Meta AGP seems appropriate. Thanks :)

19:01:54
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <burrrata>

There’s also a thread on the forum and issue opened on the GitHub repo

19:02:01
27 Apr 2019
@bridge-bot:matrix.orgbridge-bot <julian>

re quadratic voting - 👀 https://twitter.com/DeanEigenmann/status/1121761276991082496

04:21:38

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 1