Sender | Message | Time |
---|---|---|
27 Apr 2019 | ||
bridge-bot | <julian> A DAO like clockwork https://medium.com/amentum/what-types-of-organizations-should-be-autonomous-6f9dff3c5691 | 05:12:21 |
bridge-bot | <julian> re quadratic voting - 👀 https://twitter.com/DeanEigenmann/status/1121761276991082496 https://patents.google.com/patent/US9754272 | 05:17:06 |
28 Apr 2019 | ||
bridge-bot | <burrrata> Just created some suggestions to extend the AGP submission/review/voting process and add AMAs. Please let me know what you think! | 01:30:13 |
1 May 2019 | ||
bridge-bot | <johnkelleher> @GustavMarwin I believe there is a misunderstanding in regards to the Aragon Futarchy app: https://twitter.com/GustavMarwin_/status/1123261186068418560 | 14:31:55 |
bridge-bot | <johnkelleher> Use of Gnosis prediction market contracts does not make the Aragon Futarchy app somehow more centralized. | 14:32:48 |
bridge-bot | <johnkelleher> These are smart contracts that get deployed on the Ethereum blockchain | 14:33:08 |
2 May 2019 | ||
bridge-bot | <mlphresearch> I may have missed it but have you guys published anything on the participation rates in the most recent vote? | 15:53:44 |
bridge-bot | <light> @mlphresearch I’ll be doing a review with such data soon but for now you can see what is posted here: https://public.tableau.com/profile/brett.sun#!/ | 17:47:47 |
bridge-bot | <mlphresearch> Thanks! | 18:06:15 |
bridge-bot | <burrrata> I'm actually really curious about verifying voter participation too! Is there a repo where you’re building a script that can do that? | 19:38:30 |
bridge-bot | <burrrata> There’s already this one: https://github.com/aragon/aragon-apps/blob/master/apps/voting/scripts/vote-stats.js | 19:43:20 |
bridge-bot | <light> @burrrata you could just export a CSV of tx data from the voting app address on etherscan | 19:47:39 |
bridge-bot | <light> hm I thought they did exports, but looks like they don’t, or don’t anymore | 19:48:39 |
bridge-bot | <light> but anyways here’s the address: https://etherscan.io/address/0x277bfcf7c2e162cb1ac3e9ae228a3132a75f83d4 | 19:48:45 |
bridge-bot | <burrrata> Yeah that’s probably the best way. Thanks :) | 19:52:20 |
bridge-bot | <jjperezaguinaga> @light there’s currently no easy way to see who voted on which topic yes/no ? Asking cause that might sound like something I can probably wipe out pretty quick, as we might do something like that for our own DAO | 22:39:13 |
3 May 2019 | ||
bridge-bot | <light> @jjperezaguinaga I mean it’s all on the blockchain and trivial to sort out using basic analysis of the vote transactions but the voting app doesn’t have a UI for that | 01:03:57 |
bridge-bot | <jjperezaguinaga> @light gotcha, I meant something like | 05:01:41 |
bridge-bot | <light> nope but it’d be cool to see something like that | 06:18:47 |
bridge-bot | <thom.ivy> Evan Van Ness just posted some perhaps contentious interpretations of the vote data… What is . more interesting is the analytics tool he is using to do so…https://www.evanvanness.com/post/184616403861/aragon-vote-shows-the-perils-of-onchain-governance | 19:10:58 |
bridge-bot | <julian> @jjperezaguinaga These are pretty good (if you haven’t seen): https://public.tableau.com/profile/brett.sun#!/ | 22:45:59 |
4 May 2019 | ||
bridge-bot | <julian> the Joy of DAO (quick read) https://medium.com/@eric.arsenault/my-dao-experiment-part-1-586a4f418965 | 05:07:25 |
bridge-bot | <julian> dx-dao stack white paper: https://github.com/gnosis/dx-daostack/blob/master/dxdao-whitepaper-v1.pdf must admit find this a little cold, prefer a touch more ghost in my machine. | 05:09:57 |
bridge-bot | <julian> dx-dao stack white paper: https://github.com/gnosis/dx-daostack/blob/master/dxdao-whitepaper-v1.pdf must admit find this a little cold, prefer a touch more ghost in my machine. Interesting stuff though, w. some heavy critical theory. | 05:11:05 |
bridge-bot | <julian> This is interesting – an analysis of current EU-wide legislation regarding automated decision processes and relation to gdpr. UK very different than Germany (where it’s much more restrictive) : https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=218125068102114125121085027091101010103082061020005063086101084127013124113103117078123118100120050104112112075084112018004102020059005039077091127097098124078085111026009024115113091014002077022081112068099026078113006121068095020064122111005017098064&EXT=pdf | 05:23:55 |
bridge-bot | <julian> This is interesting – an analysis of current EU-wide legislation regarding automated decision making processes and relation to gdpr. UK very different than Germany (where it’s much more restrictive) : https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=218125068102114125121085027091101010103082061020005063086101084127013124113103117078123118100120050104112112075084112018004102020059005039077091127097098124078085111026009024115113091014002077022081112068099026078113006121068095020064122111005017098064&EXT=pdf | 05:24:46 |
bridge-bot | <GustavMarwin> @johnkelleher Thanks for clarifying on the forum! Sorry I’m generally not connected to the chat. | 20:31:39 |
bridge-bot | <GustavMarwin> error 522 while trying to post on the forum, is it just me? | 20:33:11 |
5 May 2019 | ||
bridge-bot | <julian> Fascinating paper regarding potential for worker coops and blockchain: https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=738087006122103125082097081069123099028084089093023056077007081000084005118020009108061062023062037126053098100099110118094108015017074002012105120126081030005089116053086035068011000074102019115069119119068102070065117074090005116116029100102113115117&EXT=pdf | 11:38:47 |
bridge-bot | <julian> The author, Morshed Mannan has been in touch asking to build on this paper with an analysis of our Aragon cooperative approaches - I’ve proposed we write a jointly authored work. | 11:41:45 |