!wypKDDiZJdzZRWebIG:matrix.org

J

148 Members
3 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
28 Nov 2021
@_discord_336567624982986752:t2bot.iomilia or teaching J using math 10:04:25
@_discord_336567624982986752:t2bot.iomilia or both 10:04:27
@_discord_174320444797747201:t2bot.iobrickviking I assume I'm supposed to build the release version of the J source, not the beta version? 10:41:08
@_discord_174320444797747201:t2bot.iobrickviking * I assume I'm supposed to build the release version of the J source, not the beta version? 10:44:12
@_discord_336567624982986752:t2bot.iomilia I've got the stable version, so I'd say yes. But let's wait to see what bobTerryo would suggest 10:48:59
@_discord_336567624982986752:t2bot.iomilia cya ! 10:49:04
@_discord_174320444797747201:t2bot.iobrickviking Arghles. Won't build on my system. 10:55:44
@_discord_174320444797747201:t2bot.iobrickviking gets so far, and then pukes about a cast from pointer to integer of different size. 10:58:41
@_discord_174320444797747201:t2bot.iobrickviking jconsole works though (downloaded the latest build), but it does complain about a filename error on startup. I typed jconsole 10:59:24
@_discord_174320444797747201:t2bot.iobrickviking * jconsole works though (downloaded the latest build), but it does complain about a filename error on startup. I typed jconsole 11:00:03
@_discord_174320444797747201:t2bot.iobrickviking and it gave me
|file name error
|       0!:0<jpathsep(4!:55(;:'systype fhs isroot userx ids md omitversion'),ids)]system,'/util/boot.ijs'
|[-53] /home/viking/bin/j64/profile.ijs
11:01:07
@_discord_174320444797747201:t2bot.iobrickviking hm. Disregard error, it seems like I initially downloaded completely the wrong build. 11:08:21
@_discord_174320444797747201:t2bot.iobrickviking but now jqt is complaining I haven't got Qt-5.12 installed (I haven't, I've got 5.11.3). 11:16:15
@_discord_174320444797747201:t2bot.iobrickviking back to j902 I suppose. Sigh. 11:19:43
@_discord_169175121037099008:t2bot.ioTechnoJo4 joined the room.14:20:07
@_discord_182575708390948864:t2bot.ioSigmund Friedrich Hegel changed their display name from Sigmund Friedrich Hegel to Sigmund Friedrich Hegel#2392.14:33:49
@_discord_182575708390948864:t2bot.ioSigmund Friedrich Hegel changed their display name from Sigmund Friedrich Hegel#2392 to Sigmund Friedrich Hegel.14:33:50
@_discord_828684654454112286:t2bot.iobobTerryo j902 is the current stable version and j903 is still having changes being made. My guess is that j903 will become the stable version sometime before the end of the year, so it is pretty close to being stable. Unless you needed some of the new changes in j903, I would go with j902 and then switch, when j903 moves out of beta. 19:58:58
@_discord_174320444797747201:t2bot.iobrickviking My problem isn't with the core itself, but someone decided they'd compile jqt against later libs than I have installed. That's not their fault - they have to aim for something after all. 21:19:13
@_discord_174320444797747201:t2bot.iobrickviking thankfully jqt for 902 works fine, and I can recompile jqt for myself. My apologies for the line noise. 21:19:30
@_discord_174320444797747201:t2bot.iobrickvikingRedacted or Malformed Event21:29:23
@_discord_174320444797747201:t2bot.iobrickvikingRedacted or Malformed Event21:31:19
@_discord_174320444797747201:t2bot.iobrickvikingRedacted or Malformed Event21:33:04
@_discord_174320444797747201:t2bot.iobrickviking thankfully jqt for 902 works fine, and I can recompile jqt for myself. My apologies for the line noise. The source for jqt compiled up fine on my system, so that removes that issue. 21:39:53
@_discord_174320444797747201:t2bot.iobrickviking * thankfully jqt for 902 works fine, and I can recompile jqt for myself. My apologies for the line noise. The source for jqt compiled up fine on my system, so that removes that issue. 21:50:11
29 Nov 2021
@_discord_174320444797747201:t2bot.iobrickviking Okay. I have run into a problem when compiling libj. Do I paste the problem I'm having here, or do I go post it on github? 03:14:08
@_discord_293790175106957312:t2bot.ioRemy_Clarke Is there an idiomatic way to emulate reach indexing in J? (Described in the link)
https://aplwiki.com/wiki/Bracket_indexing
03:34:41
@_discord_189429170198151168:t2bot.ioToanuvo i think fetch is similar https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Vocabulary/curlylfcoco 03:40:47
@_discord_293790175106957312:t2bot.ioRemy_Clarke I've never used fetch, I'll have to give it a try 03:57:25
@_discord_174320444797747201:t2bot.iobrickviking Okay, new bug(ette) posted to github. I hope I've got the right information shown. 04:08:36

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room List