!wgrHHhgFKmLcKHfUsR:matrix.org

general

371 Members
43 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
29 Sep 2024
@redman_01:matrix.orgRedman IU2KWO
In reply to @nizzo:matrix.org
What about broadcast fm?
The talkpod port implemented it as a separate opmode
06:24:52
2 Oct 2024
@hb9ssb:matrix.orgMarc Balmer HB9SSBwhat bandwidth is broadcast fm?07:06:30
@lemiel:matrix.orgRafał Likus SQ9CWNMono 19k, Stereo 54k, Stereo with RDS 59kHz. Look at https://en.wikipedia.org/Wiki/FM_broadcasting07:54:43
@hb9ssb:matrix.orgMarc Balmer HB9SSBThanks!08:00:06
@hb9ssb:matrix.orgMarc Balmer HB9SSBSo for now in my OpenRTX related code I use the following mapping: nfm = 12.5, fm = 20.0, wfm = 25.0. Though IU2KWO mentioned that 20.0 kHz as bandwidth was gone in the main branch and is only left in the rtxlink branch (on which I am working). Unless I got that wrong.08:01:49
@philmacfly:chaosmaffei.dephilmacflydidnt even know that there was a 20.0 kHz bandwith08:02:17
@hb9ssb:matrix.orgMarc Balmer HB9SSBprobably a left over? Easy to remove.... Waiting for my last pull request to be merged, then I will change the CAT interface to use pseudo-opmodes that imply the bandwidth.08:04:31
@redman_01:matrix.orgRedman IU2KWO20kHz channel bandwidth comes from the MD-380 codeplug 17:06:16
@lemiel:matrix.orgRafał Likus SQ9CWN changed their display name from Rafał Likus to Rafał Likus SQ9CWN.17:12:31
@hb9ssb:matrix.orgMarc Balmer HB9SSBIs 20 kHz still needed? And if yes, what would be a good designation? fm?18:58:19
@redman_01:matrix.orgRedman IU2KWOI think that 12.5kHz and 25kHz are enough 19:26:21
@hb9ssb:matrix.orgMarc Balmer HB9SSBok, I remove 20.0 then19:35:43
3 Oct 2024
@hb9ssb:matrix.orgMarc Balmer HB9SSBIn my next iteration I will remove fm20. For now I am waiting for the next merge.19:28:34
@hb9ssb:matrix.orgMarc Balmer HB9SSBSo fm will be 25 kHz and nfm will be 12.5 kHz19:29:22
@hb9ssb:matrix.orgMarc Balmer HB9SSBI have decoupled internal modes/bandwidths from CAT modes/bandwidths, which should give us more flexibility19:30:51
4 Oct 2024
@hb9ssb:matrix.orgMarc Balmer HB9SSBNext step: Enable PTT control over CAT07:52:43
@hb9ssb:matrix.orgMarc Balmer HB9SSBsetting rtxStatus field opStatus to 2 and then calling rtx_configure does not enable the transmitter 🤔09:07:21
@hb9ssb:matrix.orgMarc Balmer HB9SSBI think we need a flag in the global state to indicate that ptt is overridden. Currently it only check platform_getPttStatus().09:57:43
@hb9ssb:matrix.orgMarc Balmer HB9SSBIt works!10:17:34
@nizzo:matrix.orgnizzo IU2KIN That’s great, we could do some digimodes with a functional CAT interface like that 11:44:05
@nizzo:matrix.orgnizzo IU2KIN I wonder if we can have the Kenwood split into audio and usb interfaces and use both concurrently  11:44:33
@hb9ssb:matrix.orgMarc Balmer HB9SSBThis is how I implemented PTT: You can enable/disable it over CAT. If you enabled it iver CAT, and then press and release the PTT button on the real device, it will stop transmitting (button overrides CAT). If you press the hardware PTT button, and send the CAT command to disable PTT, nothing happens. -> The hardware PTT button always "wins" over the CAT command.11:47:04
@hb9ssb:matrix.orgMarc Balmer HB9SSB * This is how I implemented PTT: You can enable/disable it over CAT. If you enabled it over CAT, and then press and release the PTT button on the real device, it will stop transmitting (button overrides CAT). If you press the hardware PTT button, and send the CAT command to disable PTT, nothing happens. -> The hardware PTT button always "wins" over the CAT command.11:52:19
@hb9ssb:matrix.orgMarc Balmer HB9SSBPull request #284 created.12:15:00
@nizzo:matrix.orgnizzo IU2KIN
In reply to @hb9ssb:matrix.org
This is how I implemented PTT: You can enable/disable it over CAT. If you enabled it over CAT, and then press and release the PTT button on the real device, it will stop transmitting (button overrides CAT). If you press the hardware PTT button, and send the CAT command to disable PTT, nothing happens. -> The hardware PTT button always "wins" over the CAT command.
This sounds like a reasonable implementation!
12:38:12
@hb9ssb:matrix.orgMarc Balmer HB9SSBOn a side note, I only did it for FM for now. Need to dig a bit into the internals of M17 before touching that.12:50:25
5 Oct 2024
@hb9ssb:matrix.orgMarc Balmer HB9SSBSo I added the PTT logic to M17 as well.07:25:19
@hb9ssb:matrix.orgMarc Balmer HB9SSBNext step in making CAT useful could be to implement automatic status updates... 🤔08:08:27
@hb9ssb:matrix.orgMarc Balmer HB9SSBWhy does the TYT MD-9600 not yet work? (I have one...)08:48:36
@redman_01:matrix.orgRedman IU2KWOBecause someone has to implement the radio driver 😅10:51:39

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9