| 27 Sep 2022 |
 headius | (scope filename is the same so did not fix it) | 18:45:07 |
| headius | ok I think I have it now | 18:53:05 |
| headius | FWIW CRuby fails the test the same way if you give it the absolute path to the test when running... so the test was still broken | 18:53:45 |
| headius | looking better now | 19:01:12 |
| headius | ok looks like we're back to peak passing... remaining fails are a ton of stuff in MRI tests (we need to start evaluating what needs to be fixed), our slowly shrinking WIP specs, and the sequel and concurrent-ruby fails | 19:07:03 |
| headius | 300-something in MRI but I see a bunch of things that are probably MRI specific | 19:07:19 |
 enebo | oh the didyoumean tests for pattern matching is something involving the didyoumean module gettign swapped out | 19:11:25 |
| headius | in MRI suite? | 19:11:44 |
| enebo | If you run those tests by itself it all works so it is just something with parallel execution | 19:11:59 |
| enebo | yeah | 19:12:00 |
| enebo | https://github.com/jruby/jruby/actions/runs/3137913679/jobs/5096646057#step:7:2140 | 19:12:29 |
| enebo | I know they are not real errors and when I looked briefly it was obvious something was killing didyoumean | 19:13:29 |
| headius | enebo: aha ok | 20:05:40 |
 byteit101 | I need to buckle down and make a clean, gemified remote/Multi IRB thing. I've made dozens of project specific ones over as many years. JRuby's Readline support has always held me back before, but I hear that's improved in 9.4 so I should try again | 20:25:35 |
| headius | Yeah the dodge in 9.4 is that we support the new mostly pure Ruby reline library | 20:38:52 |
| headius | It calls out to a minimum of native console features through io/console which we implement with FFI | 20:39:32 |
| headius | Basically all the console-tweaking stty features | 20:39:55 |
| 28 Sep 2022 |
|  drbobbeaty_ joined the room. | 09:27:55 |
| headius | enebo: looking over 3.1 bullets related to the module thing, there's some additional work needed: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17423 | 16:36:38 |
| headius | there's a small but very dense diff of changes to CRuby that we'd need to translate to our structure... I won't get to it this week but this probably needs to happen since Matz claims it is broken as is (with our 3.0 change in place we largely match the output) | 16:37:30 |
| headius | since that is a showstopper I'm going to make a 9.4 issue for it so we don't forget about it | 16:37:59 |
| headius | (and because task lists on github have a convenient button to make an issue now) | 16:38:18 |
| enebo | there are specs/tests for this too right? | 16:38:23 |
| headius | yes | 16:38:27 |
| headius | tests at least | 16:38:29 |
| enebo | I have no issue with an issue though :) | 16:38:34 |
| headius | worked but a bit wonky... doesn't know how to handle multi-line tasks well I guess | 16:42:07 |
| headius | https://github.com/jruby/jruby/issues/7382 | 16:42:10 |
| 29 Sep 2022 |
| byteit101 | ooh! I'm guessing this fancy new thing is new irb? | 18:25:16 |
| byteit101 | with the drop down? | 18:25:46 |
