| 3 Apr 2022 |
 Vhyrro#1609 | oof | 16:24:55 |
 mrossinek#9180 | Vhyrro what should we call the /-detached mod? Drawer? Details? | 17:09:48 |
| mrossinek#9180 | Also do we have a name for the +-"carryover" tag now? 🤔 | 17:11:04 |
| mrossinek#9180 | Uh oh | 17:14:21 |
| Vhyrro#1609 | maybe drawer | 17:14:30 |
| mrossinek#9180 | If we use / for drawers, then this will clash with {/ link to drawer?!}... | 17:14:41 |
| Vhyrro#1609 | oh | 17:14:49 |
| Vhyrro#1609 | well frick | 17:14:59 |
| Vhyrro#1609 | can't use / for drawers then | 17:15:04 |
| mrossinek#9180 | Yep | 17:15:42 |
| Vhyrro#1609 | i was also thinking of a #details tag | 17:16:20 |
| mrossinek#9180 | Yeh that could work too | 17:16:27 |
| Vhyrro#1609 | or a #drawer tag | 17:16:32 |
| Vhyrro#1609 | casually allows nested markup while being meaningful | 17:16:53 |
| Vhyrro#1609 | * casually allows neorg markup while being meaningful | 17:17:00 |
| mrossinek#9180 | Also another side question: https://github.com/nvim-neorg/tree-sitter-norg/blob/1abeda4c83dc7869d67eb298560a16808ed1d4c0/src/scanner.cc#L544
This range includes the TODO* tags... Is that intended? | 17:17:10 |
| mrossinek#9180 | Yes | 17:17:19 |
| mrossinek#9180 | Although having a custom drawer would be nice because we have more fine-grained control on it's folded default state (hopefully in the future that is) | 17:17:49 |
| mrossinek#9180 | Or do you think a tag gives us the same? | 17:17:59 |
| Vhyrro#1609 | wdym by this? | 17:19:15 |
| mrossinek#9180 | Well if the intent is to have smth which stores details, it would be nice for the contents to be folded by default | 17:19:52 |
| mrossinek#9180 | I thought that a named TS node would be useful for that | 17:20:03 |
| Vhyrro#1609 | oof no it isn't | 17:20:08 |
| Vhyrro#1609 | ah well it could be | 17:20:14 |
| Vhyrro#1609 | but you can do that with a tag just as fine as well | 17:20:23 |
| mrossinek#9180 | I'll move them 👍 | 17:20:23 |
| mrossinek#9180 | Okay | 17:20:30 |
| Vhyrro#1609 | just make sure you don't mess anything up in the process- | 17:20:33 |
| mrossinek#9180 | I'll try 😄 | 17:20:42 |
| Vhyrro#1609 | cause there's a bit of reliance on the placement of items in the struct in some areas | 17:20:46 |
