!tglBwpUTBxHbuGLfUz:matrix.org

drone-plugins

29 Members
Chat about DroneCI plugin development23 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
16 Dec 2019
@gitter_arcolife:matrix.org@gitter_arcolife:matrix.org

@tboerger

Is he afraid now? 😝

drone-plugins/drone-bintray#25

:D

apologies about the delay! cc/ @bradrydzewski

14:55:22
@gitter_arcolife:matrix.org@gitter_arcolife:matrix.orgBuild passes. Can workout the rest with your help!14:55:37
19 Dec 2019
@joe:diasp.injoe joined the room.21:55:38
22 Dec 2019
@ottmar:openintents.modular.imottmar joined the room.22:32:04
25 Dec 2019
@anne:netzgemeinde.eu@anne:netzgemeinde.eu joined the room.21:40:29
29 Dec 2019
@gitter_dheerajkhardwal:matrix.org@gitter_dheerajkhardwal:matrix.org joined the room.08:34:45
@gitter_dheerajkhardwal:matrix.org@gitter_dheerajkhardwal:matrix.org

Hi, I am exploring plugin development for drone. I’ve the created the project using drone-plugins/boilr-plugin.

I’ve configured the builds at https://cloud.drone.io/dheerajkhardwal/drone-maven 1. But the builds are failing at linux-* > publish step with following error:

Step 1/8 : FROM plugins/base:mulitarch
77 manifest for plugins/base:mulitarch not found
78 time=“2019-12-27T14:45:37Z” level=fatal msg=“exit status 1”

I checked out drone-plugins/drone-github-release-download, which is also using plugins/base image, and it’s recent build was successful.

Am I missing something here?

08:34:46
@gitter_dheerajkhardwal:matrix.org@gitter_dheerajkhardwal:matrix.org (edited) ... at https://cloud.drone.io/dheerajkhardwal/drone-maven 1. But ... => ... at https://cloud.drone.io/dheerajkhardwal/drone-maven. But ... 08:35:10
@gitter_tboerger:matrix.org@gitter_tboerger:matrix.orgThe boilr template will receive some update because of the latest changes to to the plugin lib 17:53:37
31 Dec 2019
@tymon:junta.pl@tymon:junta.pl joined the room.16:25:38
2 Jan 2020
@gitter_dheerajkhardwal:matrix.org@gitter_dheerajkhardwal:matrix.orgOkay, thank you for the update :thumbsup: 11:26:37
6 Jan 2020
@joey:tomesh.net@joey:tomesh.net joined the room.18:29:36
@constantin:cybre.spaceconstantin joined the room.18:51:24
@hans:bau-ha.us@hans:bau-ha.us joined the room.19:21:48
@pedro:chat.weho.stpedro joined the room.22:38:07
7 Jan 2020
@kevin:kde.orgkevin joined the room.00:28:49
@gitter_garora123:matrix.org@gitter_garora123:matrix.org joined the room.10:28:55
@gitter_garora123:matrix.org@gitter_garora123:matrix.org Did a pull request in drone/autoscaler that resulted in trigger of pipeline. Unfortunately, the build failed with apparently no reason. Any clues why? https://cloud.drone.io/drone/autoscaler/132/1/4 10:28:56
@gitter_tboerger:matrix.org@gitter_tboerger:matrix.orgLook at the first lines of the test output, there you can see the failing part 10:34:53
@gitter_garora123:matrix.org@gitter_garora123:matrix.orgThanks, will investigate11:02:40
@gitter_garora123:matrix.org@gitter_garora123:matrix.org @tboerger have fixed the issue on my part. the tests are failing. https://cloud.drone.io/drone/autoscaler/133/1/4 11:14:49
@gitter_tboerger:matrix.org@gitter_tboerger:matrix.orgNow the Google tests panic :)11:36:18
@guillermo:hispagatos.org@guillermo:hispagatos.org joined the room.15:51:15
@gitter_garora123:matrix.org@gitter_garora123:matrix.orghope i am not responsible :)16:09:47
@gitter_bradrydzewski:matrix.org@gitter_bradrydzewski:matrix.orgtests are failing because the unit tests were not updated to include subnetwork in the payload16:56:50
@gitter_bradrydzewski:matrix.org@gitter_bradrydzewski:matrix.org https://github.com/drone/autoscaler/blob/master/drivers/google/create_test.go#L79:L139 16:57:54
@gitter_bradrydzewski:matrix.org@gitter_bradrydzewski:matrix.org (edited) https://github.com/drone/autoscaler/blob/master/drivers/google/create_test.go#L79:L139 => tests are failing because the unit tests were not updated to include the newly added subnetwork field in the payload 16:58:38
@gitter_garora123:matrix.org@gitter_garora123:matrix.orggot it. will add. thx17:07:00
@gitter_bradrydzewski:matrix.org@gitter_bradrydzewski:matrix.orgone question I had is whether or not we should set a default subnetwork if empty. My concern is that this could break existing installations that do not expect this behavior.17:14:35
@gitter_tboerger:matrix.org@gitter_tboerger:matrix.orgThere seem to be a standard subnet, or do I get the option default wrong?18:27:30

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: