| 19 Sep 2022 |
 Aly | afair we need shared lib generation | 17:41:04 |
 ekrich#7695 | You have to call the application from a Java app - can't start a Process to run native? | 17:43:00 |
| ekrich#7695 | It would be great if someone could verify that the Scala Native branch would work. | 17:55:52 |
 JD557#8432 | I think there was a discussion about that in the Native chat (https://discord.com/channels/632150470000902164/635668881951686686/1017347650594545664) but IIRC it would require scala-native to support JNI to get access to the Java-side APIs or something like that? | 17:59:01 |
| ekrich#7695 | The shared library is different though so you could call it via Java and JNI. There was a demo of that someone did - maybe they should add a link to the PR - I am interested in this subject because I have done and am working on the Scala plugin. | 18:07:52 |
|  mrt joined the room. | 18:43:01 |
| mrt | Hi. I try to develop a cross platform application, in particular including Android. I currently use the stack with gradle, scala 3, javafx. JavaFX is o.k., but I dislike that I would have to pay for it (not per se, but just because I am not certain whether this private project will pay off in case I go from private fun to commercial). So, I am wondering whether there are any good alternatives. I was thinking of using a two component architecture, with a JVM (Scala) backend and some browser-based frontend. For the browser part I'd probably use Scala.js. But then, I am wondering, how to deploy a two component application on an Android device. How can I run both components -- a webapplication in a browser for the UI and a server for he backend -- from a single APK? | 18:58:25 |
| mrt | In reply to @_discord_633374588629417994:t2bot.io
Yeah, I have seen this one. It uses GraalVM native image and JavaFX which is king of non-standard way of doing things on Android. In my experience native-image is painful to work with. My projects often failed to build after version updates (either GraalVM and/or Scala) and build time is unacceptably long. And it needs a lot of memory! | 18:59:07 |
| 20 Sep 2022 |
|  jkugiya joined the room. | 01:02:14 |
|  cheeze#2000 changed their profile picture. | 01:32:23 |
|  drsocks changed their display name from drsocks to drsocks#0741. | 12:00:25 |
| drsocks changed their display name from drsocks#0741 to drsocks. | 12:00:33 |
|  veegee joined the room. | 18:54:51 |
 TheElectronWill#4242 | Isn't OpenJFX a free software?
https://openjfx.io/ | 19:10:29 |
| TheElectronWill#4242 | * Isn't OpenJFX a free software?
https://openjfx.io/ reads "licensed under the GPL with the classpath exception" | 19:11:01 |
| 21 Sep 2022 |
 sideeffffect#8379 | But Gluon isn't AFAIK | 00:59:38 |
|  valerie_pe joined the room. | 07:18:27 |
|  lilyevsky joined the room. | 13:33:11 |
 makingthematrix#9466 | sideeffffect MrT
If you want to release your Android app for free, you can write to Gluon and ask for a free license. | 16:53:10 |
| makingthematrix#9466 | vitaly :
Since it's cross-platform, you can test it as a standard JVM app, and only when this works, compile it to Android. It still needs to be tested on Android, but it saves a lot of time. | 16:56:21 |
| 22 Sep 2022 |
|  @kucoin-id:matrix.org joined the room. | 19:10:52 |
| @kucoin-id:matrix.org left the room. | 20:08:24 |
|  bsd joined the room. | 20:26:10 |
|  @coin_ex_exchange:matrix.org joined the room. | 20:48:40 |
| 23 Sep 2022 |
|  firehooper joined the room. | 12:29:07 |
|  RyMi joined the room. | 14:33:38 |
|  Aleja joined the room. | 17:40:18 |
| @coin_ex_exchange:matrix.org left the room. | 19:37:54 |
| 24 Sep 2022 |
|  hchadswe1 joined the room. | 09:27:20 |
| 25 Sep 2022 |
|  Olli joined the room. | 11:34:41 |
