!seqaBRImHwZJpNbjYb:cadence.moe:8111

Bibliogram

482 Members
https://github.com/cloudrac3r/bibliogram91 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
26 Jan 2020
@rss:snopyta.orgRSS (bot)

New post in Recent Commits to bibliogram:master: Make pagination threshold more eager

13:47:14
@cloudrac3r:cadence.moe:8111cloudrac3rhuzzah13:48:04
@rss:snopyta.orgRSS (bot)

New post in Recent Commits to bibliogram:master: Write full types and fix related bugs

14:58:25
@cloudrac3r:cadence.moe:8111cloudrac3r With 5303ae1, we should be more stable than before. I haven't found any bugs, but I expect there are some. 14:59:18
@cloudrac3r:cadence.moe:8111cloudrac3rAh, here's one! RSS only shows one image.15:00:26
@thefrenchghosty:privacytools.ioTheFrenchGhosty cloudrac3r: We still don't have the permission to edit wikis FYI 15:11:54
@thefrenchghosty:privacytools.ioTheFrenchGhosty * cloudrac3r: We still don't have the permission to edit the github wiki FYI 15:12:14
@cloudrac3r:cadence.moe:8111cloudrac3rOh no! I thought I got that working...15:16:07
@cloudrac3r:cadence.moe:8111cloudrac3raha I found the switch15:16:31
@cloudrac3r:cadence.moe:8111cloudrac3rsee if you can edit now15:16:34
@rss:snopyta.orgRSS (bot)

New post in Recent Commits to bibliogram:master: RSS feed includes all gallery images

15:16:44
@thefrenchghosty:privacytools.ioTheFrenchGhostyYep we can15:16:50
@cloudrac3r:cadence.moe:8111cloudrac3rI may move the instance list to its own site at some point with its own JSON API rather than having to parse the wiki and hope people typed something reasonable15:17:26
@cloudrac3r:cadence.moe:8111cloudrac3rWiki is fine for now though15:17:31
@thefrenchghosty:privacytools.ioTheFrenchGhostyI'm writting the page listing every type of embed found, are you okay if we're including example in it?15:17:41
@thefrenchghosty:privacytools.ioTheFrenchGhosty(including not-so-sfw example like the one booteille found yesterday)15:18:06
@booteille:privacytools.iobooteille(Ah ah!)15:18:43
@stoically:matrix.orgstoici wonder; could bibliogram be a self-contained firefox add-on?15:19:00
@thefrenchghosty:privacytools.ioTheFrenchGhosty
In reply to @stoically:matrix.org
i wonder; could bibliogram be a self-contained firefox add-on?
Well technically yes, but the point of it is also to proxy the content
15:19:34
@stoically:matrix.orgstoic
In reply to @thefrenchghosty:privacytools.io
Well technically yes, but the point of it is also to proxy the content
cool. couldn't it could use an actual proxy to do proxying if that's desired?
15:20:25
@stoically:matrix.orgstoic
In reply to @thefrenchghosty:privacytools.io
Well technically yes, but the point of it is also to proxy the content
* cool. couldn't it use an actual proxy to do proxying if that's desired?
15:20:32
@cloudrac3r:cadence.moe:8111cloudrac3r

If an image requires a content warning, create a link to the image, paste the link, and write the content warning in brackets before the link. For example:

Here is an example and it is an embedded image in the wiki page: ![](https://an-ordinary.website/showcase.png)

Here is an example and it is a link to an image: [content warning: needles] https://vaccine.party/img002.png

The first one will embed inline and the second will be an appropriately cw'd clickable link.

15:22:20
@thefrenchghosty:privacytools.ioTheFrenchGhosty
In reply to @stoically:matrix.org
cool. couldn't it use an actual proxy to do proxying if that's desired?
Technically but an instance proxying is also used to obfuscate what a specific user is watching
15:22:32
@cloudrac3r:cadence.moe:8111cloudrac3r The content inside code blocks would be typed into the wiki page. 15:22:47
@cloudrac3r:cadence.moe:8111cloudrac3rIf you make a template with the structure that you want, I'll add this guideline to the top.15:23:08
@thefrenchghosty:privacytools.ioTheFrenchGhostyWell the thing is that I'm planning to link directly to the page containing the content, not to an image, so that it can be used by developpers to see if what they do is replacing the embeds15:24:57
@stoically:matrix.orgstoic
In reply to @thefrenchghosty:privacytools.io
Technically but an instance proxying is also used to obfuscate what a specific user is watching
wouldn't a proxy do the same thing?
15:25:11
@thefrenchghosty:privacytools.ioTheFrenchGhosty
In reply to @stoically:matrix.org
wouldn't a proxy do the same thing?
Not if only one user on this proxy is using the addon
15:25:37
@cloudrac3r:cadence.moe:8111cloudrac3r
In reply to @thefrenchghosty:privacytools.io
Well the thing is that I'm planning to link directly to the page containing the content, not to an image, so that it can be used by developpers to see if what they do is replacing the embeds
I see. Then just place the appropriate content warning before the link. It's fine for the link to be clickable.
15:26:07
@thefrenchghosty:privacytools.ioTheFrenchGhosty cloudrac3r: I will write everything and post it in privatebin so that you can see it 15:26:21

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 4