!rALCnapvdNTxUTuENl:matrix.org

Fedora Build System

156 Members
Fedora COPR and build tools discussion channel |​ #fedora-releng for koji /​ fedora specific items |​ #fedora-devel for general queries19 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
23 Apr 2024
@nikromen:fedora.imJiri Kyjovskybut thanks for notifying us :)12:54:00
@salimma:fedora.imMichel Lind 🎩weird... I can access kojihub.stream's c9s-build repo from COPR for x86_64, but not for aarch64 https://github.com/fedora-copr/copr/issues/323521:50:23
24 Apr 2024
@fomosapien:matrix.orgTriskelion joined the room.03:36:45
@smooge:fedora.imStephen J Smoogen Michel Lind 🎩: can you access aarch64 repo from outside of copr? 12:18:01
@gui1ty:fedora.imPenguinpee FrostyX: It seems fedora-review service is borked again. 19:54:56
@gui1ty:fedora.imPenguinpee Or maybe you've already fixed it. No action on a commit made at 2024-04-24 12:58:59 UTC, though. 19:55:56
@gui1ty:fedora.imPenguinpees/commit/comment19:56:21
@frostyx:matrix.orgFrostyX nirik: Do you think we can solve this caveman style and set a timer to reboot the Bugzilla2fedmsg service every hour? At this point, it sounds like the least painful solution to me 20:48:13
@nirik:matrix.scrye.comnirik I already restaeted it when Penguinpee said that eariler... I'd like to ask abompard for next steps from the development side before doing anything else. 20:49:04
@nirik:matrix.scrye.comnirikcan you ask in that ticket? or I can in a bit, busy with other things right now20:50:53
@frostyx:matrix.orgFrostyXSure, thank you very much. 20:52:36
@salimma:fedora.imMichel Lind 🎩
In reply to @smooge:fedora.im
Michel Lind 🎩: can you access aarch64 repo from outside of copr?
yes
21:42:45
@salimma:fedora.imMichel Lind 🎩I can browse the files just fine21:42:56
25 Apr 2024
@praiskup:matrix.orgpraiskup Stephen J Smoogen: I can confirm the aarch64 repo is not accessible from Copr aarch64 builders (EC2) 08:28:53
@praiskup:matrix.orgpraiskup
* processing: https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/kojifiles/repos/c9s-build/latest/aarch64/
*   Trying 66.187.232.100:443...<hang>
08:29:16
@praiskup:matrix.orgpraiskup
$ curl ifconfig.me
3.81.106.199
08:29:49
@praiskup:matrix.orgpraiskupWorks fine on an x86 builders ``` curl ifconfig.me 18.205.113.808:31:06
@praiskup:matrix.orgpraiskup *

Works fine on an x86 builders

curl ifconfig.me
18.205.113.8
08:31:18
@praiskup:matrix.orgpraiskupNah, works fine on a different aarch box 35.153.142.21608:36:33
@svashisht:fedora.imSiteshwar Vashisht joined the room.15:45:41
@mab879-56d8df9de610378809c4e9e6:gitter.imMab879 (Matthew Burket) joined the room.16:38:37
@mburket:fedora.imMatthew Burket joined the room.16:42:27
@salimma:fedora.imMichel Lind 🎩ah interesting. I tried several times but I might have gotten unlucky and kept getting a bad box19:15:44
26 Apr 2024
@decathorpe:fedora.imFabio Valentini (AFK until April 28) changed their display name from Fabio Valentini to Fabio Valentini (AFK until April 28).12:59:59
@gui1ty:fedora.imPenguinpee

Why is Copr not using the newer build from the Copr repo? I build python-superqt-0.6.4-2 in Copr today. I chained the build of spyder-6.0.0~a5-1 to after the build of superqt and I was expecting it to use the newer version of superqt. Instead the log tells me

Handling superqt <1.0.0,>=0.6.1 from hook generated metadata: Requires-Dist (spyder)
Requirement satisfied: superqt <1.0.0,>=0.6.1
   (installed: superqt 0.6.3)

Shouldn't the Copr repo take precedence over the Fedora repo? If not, how can I ensure it does?

21:23:47
@gui1ty:fedora.imPenguinpee *

Why is Copr not using the newer build from the Copr repo? I build python-superqt-0.6.4-2 in Copr today. I chained the build of spyder-6.0.0~a5-1 to start after the build of superqt and I was expecting it to use the newer version of superqt. Instead the log tells me

Handling superqt <1.0.0,>=0.6.1 from hook generated metadata: Requires-Dist (spyder)
Requirement satisfied: superqt <1.0.0,>=0.6.1
   (installed: superqt 0.6.3)

Shouldn't the Copr repo take precedence over the Fedora repo? If not, how can I ensure it does?

21:24:20
@gui1ty:fedora.imPenguinpeeI guess setting the repo priority is one way of achieving what I want. But it feels strangely unnecessary since the package in the Copr repo has a higher version.22:22:13
@gui1ty:fedora.imPenguinpee

It seems the repo hasn't been refreshed after the latest builds. I set the repo priority to 42 and rebuild spyder again. It took the package from the Copr repo, BUT

Handling superqt <1.0.0,>=0.6.1 from hook generated metadata: Requires-Dist (spyder)
Requirement satisfied: superqt <1.0.0,>=0.6.1
   (installed: superqt 0.6.2)

that's coming from

python3-superqt                   noarch 0.6.2-1.fc41                          copr_base  642.6 KiB

The page view hasn't registered the [latest build[(https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/gui1ty/Spyder6/package/python-superqt/) either.

22:39:30
@gui1ty:fedora.imPenguinpee *

It seems the repo hasn't been refreshed after the latest builds. I set the repo priority to 42 and rebuild spyder again. It took the package from the Copr repo, BUT

Handling superqt <1.0.0,>=0.6.1 from hook generated metadata: Requires-Dist (spyder)
Requirement satisfied: superqt <1.0.0,>=0.6.1
   (installed: superqt 0.6.2)

that's coming from

python3-superqt                   noarch 0.6.2-1.fc41                          copr_base  642.6 KiB

The page view hasn't registered the latest build either.

22:40:08
@gui1ty:fedora.imPenguinpeeMystery solved. I'm off to bed. Have a great weekend!22:40:43

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 5