16 Jan 2019 |
orishim | Hey Dylan! Good to see you here :) | 21:12:25 |
ddedi | Hey! And @dorgjelli:matrix.org I definitely have some more cooking up and in down to throw it out to you all as they come :D | 21:15:29 |
dOrgJelli | Sounds good, please do :) | 21:20:10 |
| dOrgJellichanged room power levels. | 22:50:44 |
| dOrgJellichanged room power levels. | 22:50:52 |
| dOrgJellichanged room power levels. | 22:50:57 |
| dOrgJellichanged room power levels. | 22:51:03 |
18 Jan 2019 |
| dOrgJelli set the room topic to "Chats: https://riot.im/app/#/group/+dorgtech:matrix.org". | 01:36:05 |
19 Jan 2019 |
dOrgJelli | @channel I've been thinking a lot about using GitLab, any opinions? | 05:00:09 |
dOrgAsgeir | Then the project would be much harder to find/reach.
In a way, I think we would leave the development community. "All" other projects are on GitHub.
For instance, if we were to contribute to a package we use on GitHub it would not be easy for people to check out our project.
Also, we dont leave a clear trail, so people won't be able to easily check our experience (potential clients).
Also, I think it is much harder for people to find the project and contribute.
Why would you want to move to GitLab? | 09:53:50 |
dOrgJelli | We could link to it from GitHub. Also I think GitLab has the same activity tracking as GitHub.
Reason for moving: it’s a smaller, distributed, potentially more innovative platform. I could see them being interested in DAOifying parts of themselves. Also it’s not apart of a larger monopolizing entity (Microsoft). I don’t begrudge msft for wanting to help out GitHub, but I do for acquiring them instead of just partnering. GitLab seems to be a organization that’s much more aligned with ourselves. Thoughts? | 18:51:36 |
ddedi | sounds like we need a DAO to pass/unpass this proposal lol | 19:16:56 |
dOrgJelli | 100% 😆 | 19:17:34 |
ddedi | My opinion here doesn't help too much since I'm not a developer. But it sounds like this could be a nice agenda item for tomorrow's call | 19:19:14 |
20 Jan 2019 |
| Jitsi widget added by cd10012 | 19:30:11 |
dOrgJelli | hopping in now | 19:31:52 |
orishim | Events / Space DAO - next steps: > Document the idea/ > Define roles > Chunk into separate proposals: a. on-the-ground work in NYC and SF (seed REP, run events, find sponsors) b. dev work (calendar & kickback integrations) c. stand-up the DAO
| 20:17:23 |
dOrgJelli | Notes: | 20:17:46 |
dOrgJelli | calendar integration kickback integration blockparty linked things
sf <-> ny
- resources (templates, structures, etc)
storage -> server side ipfs nodes -> funded pot
DAO proposal for codifying starfish operations DAO proposal for integrations DAO proposal for on-ground work sponsors & outreach DAO standup
| 20:17:47 |
orishim | https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1qMwTYMFpLW0KU8l9dnHkhixwhz-fo5Qtqumjg_7JZ80/edit | 20:28:41 |
dOrgJelli | Quick plug, we should document all possible ecosystem building opportunities here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1RrWjjjsSFFuo5eEL9PNcnWUHHAe4_1qy | 20:36:27 |
cd10012 | Standup:
- Cory: Prototyping graph-node integration with semantic web, daostack proposal
- Aesgir: Graph integration documentation
- Jordan: Bug fixes with dao creator, goals to have kovan launch
- Ori: Feedback form for DAO creator
- Beth: Feedback form for DAO creator, more documentation | 20:45:29 |
ddedi | Hey yall! Good talk. So after peering quick at the "Humans of dOrg" ecosystem mapping, I feel I can plug in with Biz Dev and Operations. So that would mean working close with @ontologymachine:matrix.org and @orishim:matrix.org . Before proposing any of my own ideas and adding on more, I'd like to talk with ya'll and see how I can assist in what you are already working on in Biz Dev and Operations. From there, I can bring more features in. | 22:38:31 |
| Jitsi widget removed by dOrgJelli | 23:29:36 |
dOrgJelli | ahhh fantastic! orishim any thoughts? ontologymachine was saying she's super swamped right now and won't have much time for this sort of stuff in the next few weeks (correct me if I'm misrepresenting @Beth) | 23:31:02 |
21 Jan 2019 |
ontologymachine | perfect 👏👏 shall we all schedule a call in the next few days? | 01:14:32 |
ontologymachine | yes this is true 🙏🙏 it would be ideal to have a call laying out everything and seeing what i can shift | 01:16:41 |
ddedi | Sounds good to me! | 02:00:09 |
| cd10012 invited liviade. | 21:48:20 |
| liviade joined the room. | 21:48:22 |