| 19 Jan 2019 |
 dOrgJelli | @channel I've been thinking a lot about using GitLab, any opinions? | 05:00:09 |
 Asgeir | Then the project would be much harder to find/reach.
In a way, I think we would leave the development community. "All" other projects are on GitHub.
For instance, if we were to contribute to a package we use on GitHub it would not be easy for people to check out our project.
Also, we dont leave a clear trail, so people won't be able to easily check our experience (potential clients).
Also, I think it is much harder for people to find the project and contribute.
Why would you want to move to GitLab? | 09:53:50 |
| dOrgJelli | We could link to it from GitHub. Also I think GitLab has the same activity tracking as GitHub.
Reason for moving: it’s a smaller, distributed, potentially more innovative platform. I could see them being interested in DAOifying parts of themselves. Also it’s not apart of a larger monopolizing entity (Microsoft). I don’t begrudge msft for wanting to help out GitHub, but I do for acquiring them instead of just partnering. GitLab seems to be a organization that’s much more aligned with ourselves. Thoughts? | 18:51:36 |
 ddedi | sounds like we need a DAO to pass/unpass this proposal lol | 19:16:56 |
| dOrgJelli | 100% 😆 | 19:17:34 |
| ddedi | My opinion here doesn't help too much since I'm not a developer. But it sounds like this could be a nice agenda item for tomorrow's call | 19:19:14 |
| 20 Jan 2019 |
| Jitsi widget added by  cd10012 | 19:30:11 |
| dOrgJelli | hopping in now | 19:31:52 |
 orishim | Events / Space DAO - next steps:
> Document the idea/
> Define roles
> Chunk into separate proposals:
a. on-the-ground work in NYC and SF (seed REP, run events, find sponsors)
b. dev work (calendar & kickback integrations)
c. stand-up the DAO
| 20:17:23 |
| dOrgJelli | Notes: | 20:17:46 |
| dOrgJelli | calendar integration
kickback integration
blockparty
linked things
sf <-> ny
- resources (templates, structures, etc)
storage -> server side ipfs nodes -> funded pot
DAO proposal for codifying starfish operations
DAO proposal for integrations
DAO proposal for on-ground work
sponsors & outreach
DAO standup
| 20:17:47 |
| orishim | https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1qMwTYMFpLW0KU8l9dnHkhixwhz-fo5Qtqumjg_7JZ80/edit | 20:28:41 |
| dOrgJelli | Quick plug, we should document all possible ecosystem building opportunities here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1RrWjjjsSFFuo5eEL9PNcnWUHHAe4_1qy | 20:36:27 |
| cd10012 | Standup:
- Cory: Prototyping graph-node integration with semantic web, daostack proposal
- Aesgir: Graph integration documentation
- Jordan: Bug fixes with dao creator, goals to have kovan launch
- Ori: Feedback form for DAO creator
- Beth: Feedback form for DAO creator, more documentation | 20:45:29 |
| ddedi | Hey yall! Good talk. So after peering quick at the "Humans of dOrg" ecosystem mapping, I feel I can plug in with Biz Dev and Operations. So that would mean working close with @ontologymachine:matrix.org and @orishim:matrix.org . Before proposing any of my own ideas and adding on more, I'd like to talk with ya'll and see how I can assist in what you are already working on in Biz Dev and Operations. From there, I can bring more features in. | 22:38:31 |
| Jitsi widget removed by dOrgJelli | 23:29:36 |
| dOrgJelli | ahhh fantastic! orishim any thoughts? ontologymachine was saying she's super swamped right now and won't have much time for this sort of stuff in the next few weeks (correct me if I'm misrepresenting @Beth) | 23:31:02 |
| 21 Jan 2019 |
 ontologymachine | perfect 👏👏 shall we all schedule a call in the next few days? | 01:14:32 |
| ontologymachine | yes this is true 🙏🙏 it would be ideal to have a call laying out everything and seeing what i can shift | 01:16:41 |
| ddedi | Sounds good to me! | 02:00:09 |
| cd10012 invited  liviade. | 21:48:20 |
| liviade joined the room. | 21:48:22 |
| 22 Jan 2019 |
| orishim | https://tokeneconomy.co/why-2019-will-be-the-year-of-the-dao-20f18117e4c1 | 01:49:46 |
| orishim | TL DR;
DAOs are good at:
1. coordinating resources
2. aligning stakeholders
3. censorship resistance
4. tracking & validating contributions
5. accommodating various levels of contribution
6. accommodating jurisdiction-agnostic contributions
Use-case categories:
businesses
social & political movements
networks
Global trends incentivizing DAOs:
1. work is transforming: cross-jurisdictional talent, micro-contributions that don’t fit into employee or contractor buckets
2. stakeholder driven communities are exploding (need transparent, user-controlled tools to manage resources / make decisions)
3. DeFi needs jurisdiction-agnostic organizational models
4. people want participatory governance
5. deplatforming is a growing issue (popular figures getting banned from platforms)
6. discontent is rising (lots of new political movements)
| 01:52:12 |
| dOrgJelli | I could see this going into a slide deck of some sort XD thank you for blessing this channel with this, it's fantastic | 03:12:40 |
| orishim | Definitely! This would be the “market opportunity” type intro to a pitch on dao-ification | 03:35:33 |
| dOrgJelli | 👌 | 04:00:18 |
| 24 Jan 2019 |
| orishim | finally got around to watching this. great find dOrgJelli | 01:36:20 |
| orishim | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdUpyqwsrGs | 01:36:20 |
| dOrgJelli | Hell ya! Thank @cem for that one | 05:29:02 |
