| 6 Apr 2020 |
| 15:57:15 |  pllim | In reply to@slack_astropy_U774ARTKR:openastronomy.org
I'd say, I find this confusing as well, so perhaps an issue should be open regardless if there is not one already. There is also #astropy_table:openastronomy.org channel but AFAIK, both Table maintainers either don't use Slack often or completely. |
| 15:57:47 |  ehsteve | I looked at those docs and it looks like if your columns don’t actually use quantities (in which case why use a qtable) then masking works. |
| 15:58:01 | ehsteve | But with quantities it doesn’t anymore. |
| 15:58:03 |  Cadair | In reply to @ehsteve:matrix.org
I looked at those docs and it looks like if your columns don’t actually use quantities (in which case why use a qtable) then masking works. dont forget the reply button ehsteve 😛 |
| 15:58:22 | Cadair | In reply to @cadair:cadair.com
dont forget the reply button ehsteve 😛 replies are threads on slack. |
| 15:58:54 | ehsteve | In reply to @cadair:cadair.com
replies are threads on slack. Sorry on my phone and replies are a bit wonky here. |
| 15:59:19 | ehsteve | In reply to @slack_astropy_U774ARTKR:openastronomy.org
There is also #astropy_table:openastronomy.org channel but AFAIK, both Table maintainers either don't use Slack often or completely. I looked at those docs and it looks like if your columns don’t actually use quantities (in which case why use a qtable) then masking works. |
| 16:02:43 | pllim | In reply to@ehsteve:matrix.org
But with quantities it doesn’t anymore. Masked Quantity isn't really a thing, see https://github.com/astropy/astropy/issues/1852 . There's a workaround in Table but I don't know all the tricks. |
| 16:08:17 | ehsteve | In reply to @slack_astropy_U774ARTKR:openastronomy.org
Masked Quantity isn't really a thing, see https://github.com/astropy/astropy/issues/1852 . There's a workaround in Table but I don't know all the tricks. Ah that explains it. It would be nice if it were more clear in the docs. |
| 16:09:31 | pllim | In reply to@ehsteve:matrix.org
Ah that explains it. It would be nice if it were more clear in the docs. I agree! Please open an issue. 🙂 |
| 16:13:44 | ehsteve | In reply to @slack_astropy_U774ARTKR:openastronomy.org
I agree! Please open an issue. 🙂 Will do |
| 16:15:09 | pllim | In reply to@ehsteve:matrix.org
Will do Thanks! |
| 16:33:07 | ehsteve | In reply to @slack_astropy_U774ARTKR:openastronomy.org
Thanks! here you go https://github.com/astropy/astropy/issues/10119 |
| 16:34:53 | pllim | In reply to@ehsteve:matrix.org
here you go https://github.com/astropy/astropy/issues/10119 Can you please fill out the version info under "system details" for future reference? Thanks! |
| 16:37:01 | ehsteve | In reply to @slack_astropy_U774ARTKR:openastronomy.org
Can you please fill out the version info under "system details" for future reference? Thanks! Good point. fixed. |
| 22:19:41 |  weaverba137 | Question about leap seconds in Astropy 4.0. In astropy.utils.iers, it is possible to inhibit the download of IERS tables, see, e.g. http://docs.astropy.org/en/stable/utils/iers.html#working-offline. However I can't seem to find a reference to inhibiting the download of the leap seconds file, https://hpiers.obspm.fr/iers/bul/bulc/Leap_Second.dat.
Follow up: see discussion on https://github.com/astropy/astropy/issues/9479 |
| 7 Apr 2020 |
| 14:07:30 | weaverba137 | (edited) ... file, <https://hpiers.obspm.fr/iers/bul/bulc/Leap_Second.dat>. How would one do that? => ... file, <https://hpiers.obspm.fr/iers/bul/bulc/Leap_Second.dat>.
Follow up: see discussion on <https://github.com/astropy/astropy/issues/9479> |
| 14:30:03 | pllim | In reply to@slack_astropy_U7BR3QN1X:openastronomy.org
Question about leap seconds in Astropy 4.0. In astropy.utils.iers, it is possible to inhibit the download of IERS tables, see, e.g. http://docs.astropy.org/en/stable/utils/iers.html#working-offline. However I can't seem to find a reference to inhibiting the download of the leap seconds file, https://hpiers.obspm.fr/iers/bul/bulc/Leap_Second.dat.
Follow up: see discussion on https://github.com/astropy/astropy/issues/9479 Re: https://github.com/astropy/astropy/issues/9479#issuecomment-610410473 -- Did you try setting it at the astropy.cfg level? |
| 14:36:20 | weaverba137 | In reply to@slack_astropy_U774ARTKR:openastronomy.org
Re: https://github.com/astropy/astropy/issues/9479#issuecomment-610410473 -- Did you try setting it at the astropy.cfg level? Well, I can try that, but that's not the use case I'm aiming at. I need this to be disabled in code, because that code will run on thousands of nodes, which can't be sending out thousands of download requests, and we won't necessarily be able to manipulate this file. |
| 14:42:17 | pllim | In reply to@slack_astropy_U7BR3QN1X:openastronomy.org
Well, I can try that, but that's not the use case I'm aiming at. I need this to be disabled in code, because that code will run on thousands of nodes, which can't be sending out thousands of download requests, and we won't necessarily be able to manipulate this file. Do the nodes share the same cache? |
| 14:47:48 | weaverba137 | In reply to@slack_astropy_U774ARTKR:openastronomy.org
Do the nodes share the same cache? No. |
| 14:48:31 | pllim | In reply to@slack_astropy_U7BR3QN1X:openastronomy.org
No. OK, then pre-populating the cache isn't an option for you. 🤔 |
| 14:48:51 | pllim | In reply to@slack_astropy_U774ARTKR:openastronomy.org
OK, then pre-populating the cache isn't an option for you. 🤔 Marten is not on Slack, so let's wait to see what he says there on the issue. Thanks for your patience! |
| 14:49:40 | weaverba137 | In reply to@slack_astropy_U774ARTKR:openastronomy.org
Marten is not on Slack, so let's wait to see what he says there on the issue. Thanks for your patience! No worries! |
| 8 Apr 2020 |
| 02:01:00 | |  ataratar joined the room. |
| 22:13:02 | |  moutmout joined the room. |
| 9 Apr 2020 |
| 03:46:50 | |  Raf joined the room. |
| 17:07:32 |  bsipocz | astropy-dev co-working hour now on the usual zoom link, if anyone wants to hang out there |
| 17:07:46 | bsipocz | (edited) ... hour on ... => ... hour now on ... |
| 10 Apr 2020 |
| 07:53:01 | |  Nicky Chorley joined the room. |
