!oaRMJImPLfUnnXzwnN:shivering-isles.com

HedgeDoc

787 Members
We run, support and develop the community project HedgeDoc | Latest version: https://demo.hedgedoc.org/ | Repository: https://github.com/hedgedoc/hedgedoc | Forum: https://community.hedgedoc.org | Follow us at: https://social.hedgedoc.org/ | Development chat: https://chat.hedgedoc.org/dev236 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
2 Sep 2021
@erik:michelson.euErik [🦔-dev]Yes14:45:56
@davebloggt:kif.rocksDavid [🦔-backend]https://docs.hedgedoc.org/guides/reverse-proxy/#nginx14:46:04
@erik:michelson.euErik [🦔-dev]https://docs.hedgedoc.org/guides/reverse-proxy/14:46:04
@d33tah-test:matrix.orgd33tahthanks, will test14:46:44
@d33tah-test:matrix.orgd33tahhm14:50:05
@d33tah-test:matrix.orgd33tahi copied the location tags and websocket still fails14:50:15
@d33tah-test:matrix.orgd33tahstill 40014:50:38
@davebloggt:kif.rocksDavid [🦔-backend] Do you have the http_upgrade map at the t 14:50:57
@davebloggt:kif.rocksDavid [🦔-backend] * Do you have the http_upgrade map at the top? 14:50:59
@d33tah-test:matrix.orgd33tahyup14:51:04
@d33tah-test:matrix.orgd33tahit seems to fail because of the same reason14:51:17
@d33tah-test:matrix.orgd33tahbtw auth_basic shouldn't break websockets, right?14:51:28
@davebloggt:kif.rocksDavid [🦔-backend]I would hope that it doesn't :D14:52:00
@d33tah-test:matrix.orgd33tahi mean i could imagine this being the root cause14:52:17
@d33tah-test:matrix.orgd33tahhm, nope, websocket seems fine14:54:54
@davebloggt:kif.rocksDavid [🦔-backend] Do you see a request with transport=websocket in the network tab of your browsers dev tools? 14:55:24
@d33tah-test:matrix.orgd33tahyup, this time it went through fine14:57:14
@davebloggt:kif.rocksDavid [🦔-backend]And you still can reproduce the problem?14:58:57
@d33tah-test:matrix.orgd33tah David [🦔-backend]: can't test today unfortunately :< i'll come back tomorrow if it persists. thanks for your help so far! 16:26:48
@thmo:matrix.orgthmo joined the room.16:54:15
@_xmpp_southerntofu=40militant.es:matrix.orgsoutherntofu joined the room.18:01:30
@_xmpp_southerntofu=40militant.es:matrix.orgsoutherntofuhello i'm curious about the shortcode format and upcoming hedgedoc v2 markup18:02:19
@tilman.v:atteroth.deTilman [🦔]Hello18:02:48
@tilman.v:atteroth.deTilman [🦔]What is your question?18:02:53
@_xmpp_southerntofu=40militant.es:matrix.orgsoutherntofuas far as i can tell so far there's three different shortcode syntaxes: {% code args %}, ```code (no args), and :::code {arg="value"}18:03:52
@_xmpp_southerntofu=40militant.es:matrix.orgsoutherntofuthat's according to https://hackmd.io/features?both which i'm not sure still is correct for the current hedgecode codebase18:04:20
@tilman.v:atteroth.deTilman [🦔]We're not HackMD.18:04:41
@_xmpp_southerntofu=40militant.es:matrix.orgsoutherntofui'm wondering how that's going to evolve, because i'm interested in interop with a static site generator18:04:44
@tilman.v:atteroth.deTilman [🦔]
In reply to @tilman.v:atteroth.de
We're not HackMD.
Keep that in mind
18:04:52
@_xmpp_southerntofu=40militant.es:matrix.orgsoutherntofui know sorry i would have linked to hedgedoc docs but i couldn't find anything about it except in https://docs.hedgedoc.org/references/hfm/ where shortcodes are *mentioned* but not explained18:05:17

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 7