11 Apr 2024 |
| arturaz changed their profile picture. | 09:31:24 |
| davesmith00000 changed their profile picture. | 10:23:05 |
12 Apr 2024 |
| fel_mazo joined the room. | 09:25:33 |
| nphardass joined the room. | 11:25:18 |
14 Apr 2024 |
| sumew joined the room. | 15:49:18 |
Tomasz Godzik | I think that makes sense, I can create a repo if needed | 16:15:45 |
15 Apr 2024 |
velvetbaldmime | Download CleanShot_2024-04-15_at_13.27.08.png | 12:28:10 |
velvetbaldmime | Howdy Something I got confused about today - in Munit 0.7.x and 1.x the behaviour of assume seems to be different w.r.t. rendering ignored test.
Is this intentional and can be relied on? (the latter makes more sense, ignored test just not output at all) | 12:28:10 |
velvetbaldmime | Also, the message in assume doesn't seem to be reported anywhere? I was hoping it'd be like .ignore with reason | 12:31:15 |
valencik | From what I recall the behaviour is different on different platforms too 😬
https://github.com/scalameta/munit/issues/549 | 12:31:41 |
| valencik changed their profile picture. | 12:31:41 |
velvetbaldmime | 🙃 | 12:32:06 |
velvetbaldmime | ok | 12:32:07 |
velvetbaldmime | I'm on JVM only, so not that scared | 12:32:16 |
valencik | Feel free to bump that issue with more context if you have a usecase / preferred output | 12:32:49 |
velvetbaldmime | done | 12:37:10 |
16 Apr 2024 |
| wu_lynx joined the room. | 15:44:29 |
| jackkoenig changed their profile picture. | 20:29:15 |
| andy.czerwonka joined the room. | 23:17:42 |
17 Apr 2024 |
| ashwin1899 joined the room. | 07:25:43 |
18 Apr 2024 |
| mzuehlke changed their display name from mzuehlke#0 to mzuehlke. | 06:39:00 |
| emperorf joined the room. | 13:18:36 |
| zanpreston joined the room. | 15:57:31 |
19 Apr 2024 |
| rodney0 changed their profile picture. | 17:05:50 |
22 Apr 2024 |
| renghen joined the room. | 10:02:42 |
24 Apr 2024 |
| digitalmechanic joined the room. | 10:26:55 |
25 Apr 2024 |
Tomasz Godzik | The 1.0.0-RC1 job is running! https://github.com/scalameta/munit/actions I plan to put all the changes into a separate blog psot later on to accompany the actual release | 09:05:57 |
valencik | I think when Scala 3 LTS is fixed, it won’t be a breaking change for us to update and get the fix. So it’s likely fine for us to release 1.0.0 with this bug/regression. We should call it out in the release notes though. | 12:04:40 |
| oyvindberg joined the room. | 20:48:50 |
| yeoldeporkchop changed their profile picture. | 20:57:04 |