| 13 Dec 2018 |
 cd10012 |
would this be useful/similar? cd10012 https://github.com/graphprotocol
Exactly!! thats what i meant by port to graph-node we would want to port these decorators on graphql to the version they stood up | 22:28:39 |
| cd10012 |
yes! when gareth asked about that earlier i was like, i'm pretty sure we would "mean what we think we mean" by calling the atomized narratives or whatever semantics but need to clarify
Yeah that’s one of the things I wanted to discuss tonight because it was a bit confusing for me as well | 22:29:31 |
 ontologymachine | so.. i don't know exactly what that means but we should definitely set up a call with brandon (graph protocol founder) or i can intro y'all! | 22:30:47 |
| ontologymachine | i feel like what they're working on is super aligned https://thegraph.com/careers?job=2#section3 | 22:32:24 |
| ontologymachine | https://medium.com/graphprotocol/the-graph-development-update-67ec232fbc81 | 22:33:19 |
| cd10012 |
so.. i don't know exactly what that means but we should definitely set up a call with brandon (graph protocol founder) or i can intro y'all!
i would be super interested! | 22:34:13 |
 dOrgJelli | In reply to @ontologymachine:matrix.org
so.. i don't know exactly what that means but we should definitely set up a call with brandon (graph protocol founder) or i can intro y'all! Yes please!!!! | 22:35:21 |
| dOrgJelli | In reply to @ontologymachine:matrix.org
i feel like what they're working on is super aligned https://thegraph.com/careers?job=2#section3 100% | 22:35:35 |
| ontologymachine | ok awesome tonight we can figure out exactly where y'all's work fits in together! super excited for this connection | 22:36:35 |
| cd10012 | lmao jordan just hop onto the call tn at 8pm and we could catch up on the other stuff too | 22:37:22 |
| ontologymachine | also i feel like there's a missing dimension in my expressing these ideas in the same language as yall, how can i remedy that? not exactly sure what resources or references to do that? | 22:37:54 |
| cd10012 | your time btw | 22:37:54 |
| dOrgJelli | yes sounds good. I'll be here, just call me | 22:37:59 |
| dOrgJelli | I think it's the fact that we're coming from it as a technical problem and you're coming at it as a research (right word?) problem?
I don't see it as an issue but rather a benefit to expanding our horizons and possibility space for cracking this in an elegant way. | 22:39:13 |
| dOrgJelli | Design Ops is a better phrasing then Research, yes? | 22:39:58 |
| cd10012 | shrugs | 22:40:38 |
| cd10012 | But for the language thing, yeah I do agree it might be because sometimes we use technical stuff interchangeably too much | 22:41:13 |
| ontologymachine | i mean it shouldn't be too much, i'm just trying to figure out how to bridge that gap since that's the ultimate purpose of making schemas that are interoperable btw dev and non-dev, and in the short term we're our own first use case | 22:43:22 |
| dOrgJelli | ahhh most definitely, I like the way you pu;t that and agree entirely. | 22:45:57 |
| dOrgJelli | let's "stop ourselves" next time a missconnection occurs so we can capture and analyze it | 22:46:24 |
| ontologymachine | te first step is expressing the same concept in each framework using the languge of that framework (this is the method i used to translate my clinical research experience to design research to mechanism design so assuming it will translate to the technical framework seamlessly if i know the right framework for translating, if that makes sense) | 22:47:49 |
| cd10012 | ^this x10000 | 22:48:41 |
| cd10012 | cause for example when you say schema I start thinking about data models in a very rigid wat | 22:49:39 |
| ontologymachine | well in that case i was as well - you want the schemas to be a data model that pulls data from, and is applicable to, a wide variety of potential DAO use cases. to accomplish this at scale the toolkit it's part of eventually needs to be usable and understandable by non-devs, while viable technically for devs across all possible use cases ((is my understanding)) | 22:55:10 |
| dOrgJelli | I would love to see a mapping of vocabulary like you described 🙏 that’d be immensely helpful | 22:59:19 |
| ontologymachine | maps on maps!! ok i will be able to actually get started on these this weekend and clarity + deliverables can flow from there | 23:08:40 |
| dOrgJelli | Love it! This project has me too excited, Semantic Web3 | 23:31:43 |
| 14 Dec 2018 |
| dOrgJellichanged room power levels. | 01:12:26 |
| dOrgJellichanged room power levels. | 01:12:38 |
| 16 Dec 2018 |
| dOrgJelli | Feilipe's "DAO Kitchen" beta is posted here, there are screenshots in the beta folder if you don't have illustrator: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1L5yJUZ5TH5ZMRYbIWQF2OKsreRz8_zU5 | 22:17:29 |
