Sender | Message | Time |
---|---|---|
17 Feb 2021 | ||
tgr | justinl: what version of MediaWiki is that? We don't seem to have ever used that option. | 14:39:14 |
tgr | https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki/search?q=CURLPIPE_HTTP1 | 14:39:17 |
justinl | 1.35.1 | 15:44:44 |
justinl | https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki/blob/REL1_35/includes/libs/http/MultiHttpClient.php#L455 | 15:47:19 |
justinl | tgr: | 15:48:06 |
justinl | https://curl.se/libcurl/c/CURLMOPT_PIPELINING.html | 15:49:09 |
tgr | right, so apparently someone used the integer constant value of CURLPIPE_HTTP1 instead of typing it out. Boo. | 18:29:15 |
tgr | It's the same on master, you should probably file a bug. | 18:29:36 |
justinl | Ok, thanks. | 18:49:07 |
justinl | Hopefully this is good enough for starters: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T275064 | 19:03:52 |
18 Feb 2021 | ||
cicalese | My team is hiring an Associate Engineer! Please feel free to pass this on to any junior developers who are looking for a remote position working with MediaWiki. And please feel free to reach out to me if you have any questions. https://boards.greenhouse.io/wikimedia/jobs/2897861 | 00:24:41 |
Georgios Mavropalias changed their profile picture. | 14:37:56 | |
23 Feb 2021 | ||
Макс Григор'єв joined the room. | 08:29:55 | |
Макс Григор'єв | We are an IT company and are looking for a documentation system, and therefore would like to know if there in Wikimedia (short answer: yes or no) :
| 08:30:01 |
Макс Григор'єв | help me please | 08:57:32 |
Charly | Well Maxc. Your question has a lot of other question raised to give a good answer, but as a commercial person I would say yes to all your 16 points. Standard MediaWiki can handle 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 10, 15. All your other points can be done with extensions that already exist or if its really specific a custom made extension ( but that means coding work ). But I am not the real MediaWiki expert here. | 09:01:52 |
Charly | * Well Maxc. Your question has a lot of other questions raised to give a good answer, but as a commercial person I would say yes to all your 16 points. Standard MediaWiki can handle 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 10, 15. All your other points can be done with extensions that already exist or if its really specific a custom made extension ( but that means coding work ). But I am not the real MediaWiki expert here. | 09:02:03 |
Charly | * Well Makc. Your question has a lot of other questions raised to give a good answer, but as a commercial person I would say yes to all your 16 points. Standard MediaWiki can handle 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 10, 15. All your other points can be done with extensions that already exist or if its really specific a custom made extension ( but that means coding work ). But I am not the real MediaWiki expert here. | 09:13:50 |
bryandamon | Макс Григор'єв: To expand a bit, I'll take stab and others can correct me:
| 09:14:05 |
Макс Григор'єв | Dokuwiki and MediaWiki are the same? | 09:17:05 |
Marijn van Wezel | Dokuwiki is much simpler | 09:18:05 |
hexmode |
| 16:38:15 |
hexmode | * Dokuwiki is not MediaWiki. Much different. | 16:38:23 |
24 Feb 2021 | ||
SeriousFun01 | In reply to @maxhryhoryev:matrix.orgThey both have wiki in the name (and php in the code) but that is where similarities end :-). Dokuwiki is simpler (eg file based, no db backend) | 08:08:22 |
richardheigl | I think we've touched on this here before: Elasticsearch is changing its licensing system with version 7.11. After that, there will no longer be a recognized open source license for Elasticsearch. We are monitoring the situation. Amazon and Logz.io have announced forks, but so far there is nothing to be seen. Is the Wikimedia Foundation already thinking about this? I assume that all MediaWiki organizations will agree on the same solution and that will depend on the WMF. | 11:48:04 |
cicalese | Yes, they are indeed already thinking about this, but I do not know the current thoughts. I will ask. | 11:54:11 |
tgr | https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T272111 | 12:22:27 |
cicalese | Thank you, @tgr. I was just looking for that! 😁 | 12:27:36 |
25 Feb 2021 | ||
justinl | Hey all, I'm testing MW 1.35 for an upgrade from 1.34 and running into a Varnish problem. It seems like with 1.35 it's always setting a session cookie named <dbname>mwuser-sessionId , which is causing Varnish to never cache anything since a standard VCL block recommended for MW Varnish config is | 18:05:40 |
justinl | if (req.http.Authorization || req.http.Cookie ~ "session" || req.http.Cookie ~ "Token") { return (pass); } /* Not cacheable by default */ | 18:05:42 |