| 20 Oct 2021 |
 kathy | 70 complete | 07:00:38 |
 gary_internet | Bailey had 80 started and 4 completed on 10k when he hit 191 wpm. | 07:00:50 |
| kathy | maybe i just am bad at anything that isn't eng 200 | 07:01:09 |
| kathy | cause 4 hours seems like plenty of time | 07:01:16 |
| gary_internet | A ratio of 1 to 61.3. | 07:01:48 |
| gary_internet | I think I know the answer, but what is your accuracy on your PB for 200? | 07:02:13 |
| kathy | 91.92% | 07:02:27 |
| kathy | and my eng 1k pb has an acc of 92.07 | 07:03:38 |
| gary_internet | That is certainly not going to help. Look at the accuracy of every above you on that leaderboard. I bet that nobody is lower than 95% (there might have been one person on 93%) but the top people are all going to be no worse than 97.50%. | 07:03:47 |
| kathy | wired tho..... | 07:04:05 |
| kathy | ok so right above me is a 94.39 | 07:04:26 |
| gary_internet | For these PBs, did you steamroll straight over the errors and keep charging onward, or did you correct them? | 07:04:46 |
| kathy | correct errors | 07:05:06 |
| gary_internet | If we are talking about (and I assume we are) cumulative time actually spent pressing the keys on 1k, then yes, that is enough time to get to 160 wpm for someone in the 190s on 200. You already know 1 out of every 5 words and my ight example above shows that you will also be fine with many of the words that aren't in 200. | 07:07:20 |
| kathy | let me check how much time i have on eng 200 | 07:07:48 |
| kathy | just 60 second test | 07:07:51 |
| kathy | i have almost 9 hours | 07:08:06 |
| kathy | just on the 60 second test | 07:08:09 |
| gary_internet | If you can get your accuracy to 96% at worst, and then do a test on 200 and not correct any errors that you do make, you will break 200 wpm. | 07:08:10 |
| kathy | i can't get 96% acc tho | 07:08:33 |
 CTGAP | waiting on the handcam to prove it's not just stop on letter | 07:08:37 |
| kathy | it is currently too hard for me | 07:08:38 |
| kathy | you got a handcam | 07:08:47 |
| kathy | https://tenor.com/view/troll-pilled-gif-19289988 | 07:08:51 |
| CTGAP | bruh | 07:08:53 |
| gary_internet | But correcting all your errors when your accuracy is 91% is going to slow you down MASSIVELY. | 07:09:04 |
| gary_internet | * But correcting all your errors when your accuracy is 91% is going to slow you down MASSIVELY. | 07:09:21 |
| kathy | be grateful child | 07:09:47 |
| gary_internet | Yes you can. You can get 99% accuracy right now if you go slow enough. But your ego won't let you go slowly in the short term (the next couple of months) because you like knowing that you're a "fast typist". | 07:11:02 |
| kathy | sorry, i was going to add to that "without losing too much speed" but COLBY BUTTED IN and i forgot, also i feel like going at a faster pace rather than a slower pace will be more beneficial to my acc but idk if it is actually detrimental, also "fast typist" 🤔 🤔 | 07:13:23 |
