| 24 Apr 2024 |
 pawan | nasa-worldview-2023 MAY 08-to-2023 MAY 15 (1).gif | 05:14:37 |
| pawan | Some of you have been within the Disaster Management Mapathon done by GREd Foundation using NASA WOrldview , Cyclone Mocha has its Affects and impact for three countries namely India , Myanmar and Bangladesh . These are the tasks you can map on OSM https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/16522 . | 05:15:58 |
 Heinz Vieth | Windmills:
A lot of windmills are already mapped.
But it is difficult to find them in sat images.
So inform me, if you find unmapped windmills. | 05:21:51 |
 Arjuna Rao Chavala | 
Download image.jpeg | 05:34:17 |
| Arjuna Rao Chavala | Heinz , I tried OSMAND on my recent trip. For this section in screenshot, I saw multiple NH entries 75 square with white background 75 in highway like shield with yellow colour. I would like to know how to get rid of the duplicate label for the highway. | 05:34:17 |
| Arjuna Rao Chavala | Heinz , Second question, the old NH4 relation is still being shown. Should such relations need to be deleted, as otherwise they can lead to confusion? | 05:34:30 |
| Arjuna Rao Chavala | Here is the OSM link for the segment in pic https://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=13.1206&lon=77.8911 | 05:38:39 |
| Heinz Vieth | Old NHs:
all NH ways have only new numbers in the ref tag and maybe a ref:old tag. I think that is OK.
Most old NH relations only have a ref:old tag. The old NH4 is an exceptions ref=4!!
I could check all old nh relations. So that they only have a ref:old tag. That would solve the problem. | 05:47:04 |
| Arjuna Rao Chavala | I think the old NH4 maps to two new NH as the old one had both N-S, E-W segments. The relation may need to be deleted, after updating the segments of new NHs with the ref:old tag. | 05:49:29 |
| Arjuna Rao Chavala | If you think that not having 'ref' tag will solve the issue, I am fine. | 05:51:41 |
| Heinz Vieth | Yes, I am quite sure, that nobody renders a ref:old tag. | 05:53:20 |
| Heinz Vieth | OK,I will control the old NH relations. | 06:12:00 |
| Arjuna Rao Chavala | Any feedback about duplicated NH number display for example 75 in the screenshot. | 06:25:56 |
| Heinz Vieth | I made corrections to the old NH4,104 and 222. | 08:57:01 |
|  𝐕2 changed their profile picture. | 18:45:37 |
| 25 Apr 2024 |
 Arun Ganesh | In reply to Heinz Vieth
Old NHs:
all NH ways have only new numbers in the ref tag and maybe a ref:old tag. I think that is OK.
Most old NH relations only have a ref:old tag. The old NH4 is an exceptions ref=4!!
I could check all old nh relations. So that they only have a ref:old tag. That would solve the problem. The old refs are no longer relevant from what I’ve seen. The renumbering seems to be complete on the ground except for old address boards of shops. Maybe we set a date for dropping those relations sometime this year? | 02:58:33 |
 Mikko | Download * Poster .mp4 | 04:25:36 |
| Mikko | In reply to reueld
Looks great. All the best. You might want to update the date in the text. hahahha see u in 2029! Thanks for the scan XD | 04:26:04 |
| Mikko | In reply to Jesvin Jose
Are you planning to self host or use some service? We're gonna self host Jesvin :) | 04:26:40 |
| Mikko | In reply to @sahilister:utwente.io
Mikko: Request to have such events on BBB or Jitsi. OSM's BBB instance works quite well for such events and has open policy too :) Thanks Sahilister! Will take this into consideration for future events. | 04:27:29 |
|  contrapunctus changed their display name from fugata to contrapunctus. | 04:51:41 |
| Arjuna Rao Chavala | In reply to Arun Ganesh
The old refs are no longer relevant from what I’ve seen. The renumbering seems to be complete on the ground except for old address boards of shops. Maybe we set a date for dropping those relations sometime this year? I looked into the usage of old NH relations. I found https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Highway_4_(India,_old_numbering)
article using OSM map from the old relation. Necessary advance alerts may be needed, so that such usages can be updated with static images by interested users. | 09:57:38 |
| Arjuna Rao Chavala | Here are my notes on updating AP district shapes following transfer of a subdistrict to a neighboring district and related articles and pages on Wikidata, Wikipedia and Wikimedia commons. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Andhra_Pradesh/Notes/Arjunaraoc/Updates_for_a_sub-district_transfer_to_adjacent_district | 10:44:42 |
| Heinz Vieth | WE dont need to delete the old NH relations. We only have a problem, if somebody adds there a ref-tag. Maybe we can add a note to these relations: "Please do not add a ref-tag!" | 12:47:55 |
| Arjuna Rao Chavala | Heinz and @planemad, I added as suggested to the description and note tags. For every editor of the highway who misses the note, may feel the need to edit it. It also increases the clutter of unmaintained highway relations. I feel it is better to delete the old relations after giving advance notice to users on Wikipedia, Wikidata. | 23:14:28 |
|  @0mercy4t33n-tw3en:matrix.org joined the room. | 23:44:23 |
| 26 Apr 2024 |
| @0mercy4t33n-tw3en:matrix.org left the room. | 00:03:22 |
|  rafa9994 joined the room. | 00:07:11 |
|  Pirate Bady changed their profile picture. | 02:04:42 |
 S | In reply to Vonter
Overpass Turbo is the best to run queries in general. For example:
Speed Cameras in Bangalore: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1JZ7
Surveillance Cameras in Bangalore: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1JZ9
In the links you shared, some of the locations have vague names, but the rest of them should be possible to geocode using a tool like Nominatim to find the location of each junction: https://nominatim.org/ Thank you. Will try out | 15:33:00 |
