Sender | Message | Time |
---|---|---|
30 Mar 2023 | ||
In reply to 快乐的老鼠宝宝Fantastic. Thanks for getting back on this. Could you ask them to make their change set comments a bit more detailed and square off buildings? | 03:48:08 | |
In reply to ChinmaySorry but my communication to them may not be able to ask this, I suggest you comment under the changeset of the corresponding building 😂 | 03:50:26 | |
Will do. It’s not much of an issue tbh until you try to render data on a map tile and then suddenly you’ve got this bunch of buildings that look like crooked teeth 😂 | 03:52:41 | |
04:03:10 | ||
In reply to Aman MalikMapped Tracks in India are in most cases the only but unpaved connection of villages to the world. Of course this is not the official OSM definition of tracks. Do the official length values exclude track roads? I dont know. | 06:05:25 | |
In reply to Heinz ViethI don't know the stages of road building in other countries, but in Himachal Pradesh - official roads (which require multiple level of clearances) do eventually get metalled (although the quality in rural areas might be really bad). Un official roads also exist aplenty - where villagers cumulatively collect money + use Panchayat funds to construct roads to get their produce out- these are generally track roads where only 4x4 can go. These are unofficial because no clearances were granted. Unless there is local knowledge, it is hard to say if a road is official or unofficial. | 06:17:24 | |
The official statistic defines several classes of roads. Among them:"roads with a carriageway composed od natural soil" | 06:23:18 | |
* The official statistic defines several classes of roads. Among them:"roads with a carriageway composed of natural soil" | 06:31:04 | |
Excluding tracks in HP reduces the total length from 36416 to 33591km. | 06:34:36 | |
All mapped tracks (which I checked) in RJ are defined as rural roads in SOI and Bharatmaps. | 06:41:11 | |
10:37:40 | ||
12:31:08 | ||
12:31:10 | ||
14:43:42 | ||
From local knowledge of New Delhi Railway station, I know https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509045597 exists but https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509045600 doesn't. Want to confirm is it essential/good practice/SOP to connect footways to railway platforms so https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509045600 was added? | 15:00:31 | |
Has been done on almost all the platforms like
| 15:01:51 | |
What has been done about your ethics? | 15:27:12 | |
Is there any progress on that front? | 15:27:24 | |
sahilister: I look at those and imagine someone walking off the platform onto the tracks 😄️ | 15:32:07 | |
In reply to सागर आचार्यPlease stop trolling others | 15:55:08 | |
* Please stop trolling | 15:55:18 | |
just banned a troll | 15:56:53 | |
Download image.jpeg | 16:04:59 | |
It’s high time we add some official rules. This is a screenshot from the OSM discord. I feel 1, 2, 3 should be enough. | 16:04:59 | |
This looks good, if nobody has any other suggestions, we can add this to the group | 16:17:21 | |
17:14:27 | ||
17:21:55 | ||
18:16:19 | ||
18:45:58 | ||
18:45:59 |