!hkWCiyhQyxiYJlUtKF:matrix.org

PlasmaPy

145 Members
Main room for PlasmaPy, the open-source plasma physics Python library23 Servers

Load older messages


Timestamp Message
7 Apr 2020
21:22:59@cadair:cadair.comCadairnot sure if you want to leave that there or not
21:24:04@cadair:cadair.comCadairit's more a "ongoing call" type feel
21:24:01@StanczakDominik:matrix.orgDominik Stańczak
In reply to@cadair:cadair.com
not sure if you want to leave that there or not
Could you please elaborate?
21:24:10@cadair:cadair.comCadairbut you also can leave it 😁
21:30:50Jitsi widget removed by @namurphy:matrix.orgNick Murphy
21:32:04Google Calendar widget removed by @namurphy:matrix.orgNick Murphy
21:32:18@namurphy:matrix.orgNick MurphyYeah, perhaps we should re-add it as needed, or maybe create a separate Riot channel specifically for our community meetings. I removed the google calendar app too for the time being.
8 Apr 2020
19:45:52@namurphy:matrix.orgNick Murphy rocco8773: Were we still thinking of creating an add-on/entrypoints package template?
19:46:55@namurphy:matrix.orgNick Murphy * rocco8773: Were we still thinking of creating an add-on/entrypoints package template?
19:46:53@cadair:cadair.comCadair
In reply to @StanczakDominik:matrix.org
Could you please elaborate?
having the widget is more "a call is active" type thing.
19:48:54@rocco8773:matrix.orgrocco8773
In reply to @namurphy:matrix.org
rocco8773: Were we still thinking of creating an add-on/entrypoints package template?
Yes, that's the plan. I just haven't gotten around to doing the PR and template repository.
20:03:20@namurphy:matrix.orgNick MurphyAwesome, thanks!
20:04:18@cadair:cadair.comCadairIf you are building a package template may I humbly suggest you fork https://github.com/OpenAstronomy/packaging-guide
20:05:00@cadair:cadair.comCadairit's supposed to be very minimal and extensible
20:05:08@namurphy:matrix.orgNick MurphyNice
20:05:07@cadair:cadair.comCadairI have recently rebased the sunpy one ontop of it
20:08:21@namurphy:matrix.orgNick Murphy I was wondering about existing templates, but haven't been sure how well they would fit with using entrypoints for our add-ons
20:17:22@cadair:cadair.comCadairall suggestions / contributions are welcome of course
20:13:07@namurphy:matrix.orgNick Murphy I just tentatively created a PlasmaPy fork of the OpenAstronomy packaging guide
20:13:32@rocco8773:matrix.orgrocco8773
In reply to @cadair:cadair.com
If you are building a package template may I humbly suggest you fork https://github.com/OpenAstronomy/packaging-guide

Thanks for the headsup. I'll take a look into it.

I haven't quite decided if it's better to setup the repository as an example addon package or a template addon package. My idead with the entry_points is that people can just extend plasmapy from the package they're already developing. With that in mind, I think an example package is better way to go than a template package.

20:15:14@namurphy:matrix.orgNick MurphyFor the non-equilibrium ionization modeling stuff, I was hoping to restart it as a new package with a template.
20:15:26@namurphy:matrix.orgNick MurphyI'll put this on the agenda for Tuesday
20:16:05@namurphy:matrix.orgNick Murphy(by the way - I hope everyone is hanging in there okay!)
20:17:18@namurphy:matrix.orgNick Murphy...though maybe it would be better to just work with the existing NEI modeling package.
20:36:00@cadair:cadair.comCadair
In reply to @rocco8773:matrix.org

Thanks for the headsup. I'll take a look into it.

I haven't quite decided if it's better to setup the repository as an example addon package or a template addon package. My idead with the entry_points is that people can just extend plasmapy from the package they're already developing. With that in mind, I think an example package is better way to go than a template package.

it's easy to take a template like that one and render an example from it. You can do that with CI like astropy/package-template does
9 Apr 2020
19:42:00@rocco8773:matrix.orgrocco8773 Nick Murphy Dominik Stańczak It looks like I've figured out the fail documenation builds. If either of you can review PR #780, then I can merge it and PR #781.
19:42:05@_neb_github:matrix.orgGithubhttps://github.com/PlasmaPy/PlasmaPy/pull/780 : Fix building of documentaiton using tox
19:42:06@_neb_github:matrix.orgGithubhttps://github.com/PlasmaPy/PlasmaPy/pull/781 : Automate document version to match plasmapy.__version__
20:27:23@namurphy:matrix.orgNick MurphyThanks! I approved the PRs.
10 Apr 2020
07:22:26@ndchorley:matrix.orgNicky Chorley joined the room.

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room List