| 22 Jun 2021 |
 P64 Protocol Droid 5 | [I] <@phone> no, 11 | 20:33:41 |
| P64 Protocol Droid 5 | [I] <@phone> 11.1 came out a month or three ago | 20:33:53 |
| P64 Protocol Droid 5 | [I] <@gnarface> 7.8 did exist in debian unstable, that's where i got the package | 20:33:58 |
| P64 Protocol Droid 5 | [I] <@gnarface> it was quite some time ago | 20:34:01 |
| P64 Protocol Droid 5 | [I] <@gnarface> sometimes debian unstable is used to test versions of things that don't get released to stable | 20:35:15 |
| P64 Protocol Droid 5 | [I] <@gnarface> some stuff makes it past experimental but still get pulled later | 20:35:36 |
| P64 Protocol Droid 5 | [I] <@phone> still not believing they called it "gcc 7.8" | 20:37:37 |
| P64 Protocol Droid 5 | [I] <@gnarface> maybe it was g++? | 20:38:54 |
| P64 Protocol Droid 5 | [I] <@phone> could be a 7.4.0-8? i see that was a version | 20:39:40 |
| P64 Protocol Droid 5 | [I] <@gnarface> anything's possible but i doubt it | 20:40:09 |
| P64 Protocol Droid 5 | [I] <@gnarface> the important takeaway anyway is that it won't work before whatever 7.x release was currently in debian unstable at the time | 20:40:50 |
| P64 Protocol Droid 5 | [I] <@gnarface> and the previous debian release was on 6.x | 20:40:58 |
| P64 Protocol Droid 5 | [I] <@gnarface> looks like they have 10.2 in there now | 20:42:39 |
| P64 Protocol Droid 5 | [I] <@phone> 10.3 was out while back | 20:45:25 |
| P64 Protocol Droid 5 | [I] <@gnarface> yea but 10.2 is still the latest thing in the repo | 20:48:37 |
| P64 Protocol Droid 5 | [I] <@gnarface> with the exception of for some reason a couple 11.x packages related to nvidia compilers | 20:48:54 |
| P64 Protocol Droid 5 | [I] <@gnarface> (i assume just slid in there early to break everyone else's shit) | 20:49:10 |
| P64 Protocol Droid 5 | [I] <@gnarface> hmmm | 22:01:57 |
| P64 Protocol Droid 5 | [I] <@gnarface> phone: i guess you're right, my notes must be wrong because the log says it was actually gcc 7.2.0 | 22:02:15 |
| P64 Protocol Droid 5 | [I] <@gnarface> so it should be working even that long ago | 22:02:23 |
| P64 Protocol Droid 5 | [I] <@gnarface> maybe i saw 7.2.0-8 and misread it | 22:03:01 |
| P64 Protocol Droid 5 | [I] <@phone> ah, that's before i started paying attention to gcc 7 then :-) as a rule, i've been ignoring the initial and first patch release of gcc, since gcc 3.3. | 22:32:20 |
| 23 Jun 2021 |
|  rubberchicken joined the room. | 00:06:25 |
| rubberchicken set a profile picture. | 00:43:28 |
| rubberchicken | does anyone know what happened to the debian images for the pinebook pro? | 01:02:38 |
| rubberchicken | wasnt it the previous default os? i cant seem to find the images on the wiki or website | 01:04:10 |
| P64 Protocol Droid 5 | Redacted or Malformed Event | 02:10:21 |
| P64 Protocol Droid 5 | [D] <@Tenacious-Techhunter> @Strit, evidently, Manjaro ships with "pinky" instead of "finger"; naturally, it never occurred to me that there would be a replacement for finger, but, evidently, there was; took some doing to find out, though. | 05:31:57 |
| P64 Protocol Droid 5 | [D] <@Tenacious-Techhunter> Why resort to weird versions of GCC when you could just tell *one* fully up-to-date version of Clang which architecture you feel like cross-compiling for at each and every whim? | 05:37:08 |
| P64 Protocol Droid 5 | [D] <@Tenacious-Techhunter> * Why resort to weird versions of GCC when you could just tell one fully up-to-date version of Clang which architecture you feel like cross-compiling for at each and every whim? | 05:37:38 |
