!fHVlXEMMxJXLeTPzCf:matrix.org

poliastro-earth

31 Members
poliastro for geocentric applications (commercial satellites, specialized gravitational and atmospheric models, TLEs)4 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
14 Jul 2020
@astrojuanlu:matrix.orgastrojuanluand also https://www.fatiando.org/harmonica/latest/ 😱13:31:24
@meuge:matrix.orgmeuge Looks good!! But we should take into consideration that the package is in the early stages of design and implementation. That's what makes me doubt a little bit. 14:19:59
@astrojuanlu:matrix.orgastrojuanluyou're right, I'm trying to understand the roadmap with the authors https://twitter.com/poliastro_py/status/128303632511811994914:27:52
@astrojuanlu:matrix.orgastrojuanluthe authors responded - I think we'll have to keep a close eye on them :)15:04:14
21 Jul 2020
@astrojuanlu:matrix.orgastrojuanlu had some time to review the different repeating groundtrack algorithms from the information meuge posted, left a comment https://github.com/poliastro/poliastro/pull/984#issuecomment-661816355 12:09:07
29 Jul 2020
@danlub:matrix.orgdaluar changed their display name from danlub to daluar.18:20:58
30 Jul 2020
@jorgepiloto:matrix.orgjorgepiloto

Related with issue #497

While having a walk I though about the following: should we implement this under new poliastro.earth sub-package? We might create something like poliastro.earth.plotting in which a simple groundtrack.py module could be placed. This feature might enhance the use of the new module focused on Earth capabilities.

13:57:28
@jorgepiloto:matrix.orgjorgepiloto *

Related with issue #497 about groundtrack plotter

While having a walk I though about the following: should we implement this under new poliastro.earth sub-package? We might create something like poliastro.earth.plotting in which a simple groundtrack.py module could be placed. This feature might enhance the use of the new module focused on Earth capabilities.

13:57:51
@jorgepiloto:matrix.orgjorgepiloto *

Related with issue #497 about groundtrack plotter

While having a walk I though about the following: should we implement this under new poliastro.earth sub-package? We might create something like poliastro.earth.plotting in which a simple groundtrack.py module could be placed. This feature might increase the use of the new module 🤔

13:59:02
@astrojuanlu:openastronomy.orgjuanluastro jorgepiloto I totally agree! 17:24:34
@jorgepiloto:matrix.orgjorgepilotoCool! I will add a comment in the issue 🚀19:57:17
20 Aug 2020
@raahulsingh:matrix.org@raahulsingh:matrix.org changed their profile picture.12:46:46
6 Sep 2020
@rocknpools:matrix.org@rocknpools:matrix.org set a profile picture.11:53:52
7 Sep 2020
@astrojuanlu:matrix.orgastrojuanlu meuge: I think I'll be the first user of the new ground-range functions you implemented! so glad to have them in poliastro already 😍 14:22:10
@meuge:matrix.orgmeugeAmazing! If you any feedback as a user, we would try to implement it 😃17:19:16
@astrojuanlu:matrix.orgastrojuanluScreenshot_2020-09-07 Double target study - Jupyter Notebook.png
Download Screenshot_2020-09-07 Double target study - Jupyter Notebook.png
18:00:24
@astrojuanlu:matrix.orgastrojuanlu hmm this is returning \Lambda_min and \Lambda_max, but I would have expected (negative, positive) in that case meuge ? 18:00:46
@meuge:matrix.orgmeuge I'll check that out. 18:02:32
@astrojuanlu:matrix.orgastrojuanlu

just in case, I used these values:

max_and_min_ground_range(480 * u.km, 50 * u.deg, η_center=0 * u.deg, R=6371.0088 * u.km)
18:04:16
@meuge:matrix.orgmeugeIt's returning \Lambda_max and \Lambda_min. Buy if you prefer, I can change the order or the returning parameters.18:26:57
@meuge:matrix.orgmeugeIMG_20200907_152554_748.png
Download IMG_20200907_152554_748.png
18:27:04
@astrojuanlu:matrix.orgastrojuanluwoops! the order of the parameters in the docstring confused me 😅18:28:35
@astrojuanlu:matrix.orgastrojuanluit's a trivial fix then18:28:41
@astrojuanlu:matrix.orgastrojuanlu instead of amending it meuge , would you please open an issue in poliastro? I'll label it as "good first issue" and "hacktoberfest" 18:29:02
@meuge:matrix.orgmeuge Do you think that we should also change the name min_and_max_ground_range to avoid any further confusion? 18:31:32
@astrojuanlu:matrix.orgastrojuanlugood idea, now it's a good moment because we didn't release yet18:48:05
@astrojuanlu:matrix.orgastrojuanlu meuge: you just gained write access to poliastro, if you end up opening the issue feel free to tag it yourself :) otherwise I'll do it tomorrow 20:58:02
@meuge:matrix.orgmeugeDon't worries . I am on it 😃21:00:01
20 Oct 2020
@raf:matrix.org@raf:matrix.org left the room.18:47:14
28 Oct 2020
@xionbox:matrix.org@xionbox:matrix.org joined the room.23:27:37

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 5