| 23 Apr 2024 |
 Jan PE0SAT | pe2bz: Weird signal | 17:06:43 |
| Jan PE0SAT | 
Download image.png | 17:06:50 |
 pe2bz | No arguing on that 😅 | 17:14:49 |
| pe2bz | But still very strange, you can zoom in, pick a nice doppler curve, with either s and a small wide or with D, and both give a nice plot, with the famous last words "no match found" | 17:25:38 |
| pe2bz | * But still very strange, you can zoom in, pick a nice doppler curve, with either s and a small widh or with D, and both give a nice plot, with the famous last words "no match found" | 17:26:08 |
| pe2bz | In reply to @pe2bz:matrix.org
Not close enough, but 58700 to 58703 are from 2024-01-05 launch so that could still be the source ? * Nope. 2 other candidates left but one is on HEO and one is single and no match... | 17:26:21 |
| pe2bz | * But still very strange, you can zoom in, pick a nice doppler curve, with either s and a small width or with D, and both give a nice plot, with the famous last words "no match found" | 17:26:36 |
| Jan PE0SAT | the same behavior on my side maybe cgbsat is familiar with these signals/satellites | 17:34:27 |
 Martin HB9FXX | In reply to @pe0sat:matrix.org
sent an image. No clue, already observed, not identified. | 17:35:28 |
| pe2bz | Not a single trace in any of the strf's for trying to lock to a groundstation either. Are we somehow missing a bunch of tle's / classified satellites ? | 17:40:18 |
| Martin HB9FXX | In reply to @pe2bz:matrix.org
Not a single trace in any of the strf's for trying to lock to a groundstation either. Are we somehow missing a bunch of tle's / classified satellites ? There is quite a bunch of missing satellites in McCant's. Often had clean and nice signals that didn't fit anything, even remotely. | 17:41:48 |
| pe2bz | 
Download image.png | 17:43:11 |
| pe2bz | Can we first agree on a center frequency of 2265.100 MHz and about 2 MHz width ? | 17:43:28 |
| Martin HB9FXX | In reply to @pe2bz:matrix.org
Can we first agree on a center frequency of 2265.100 MHz and about 2 MHz width ? I'd say that too | 17:45:28 |
| Martin HB9FXX | I'm running a 24h 20MHz wide scan centered on 2230 today, 2250 tomorrow and 2270 on Thursday, maybe i'll get it too. | 17:47:24 |
| Jan PE0SAT | I just switched to 2250 20msps | 17:49:10 |
| Jan PE0SAT | Maybe it is a HEO | 17:49:46 |
| pe2bz | Wouldn't the duration be much longen ? ICO F2 is HEO, LoRa and is visible hours in one pass ? | 17:54:32 |
 sa2kng | mmm, raspberry pi 5 with 250GB nvme as root, this is going to be good (: | 18:11:21 |
| pe2bz | Now, what if .....
I find one document pointing to Seasat 1 or Seasat A failing after 105 days of operation, that's have been operating on 2265.1 MHz.
http://www.svengrahn.pp.se/trackind/freqlist/SpaceFreq11.htm
If I enter 10967 for that frequency it appears at the moment of the 18:00 UTC signal. Does it make sense to try to find anything like Seasat's successors ? | 18:16:34 |
 EggBird | <Tigris> [SatNOGS Operations activity] Alfredos-Panagiotis Damkalis opened issue #285: Recheck SNIPE A to D identifications at librespacefoundation / SatNOGS Operations < https://gitlab.com/librespacefoundation/satnogs-ops/-/issues/285 > | 18:18:04 |
| pe2bz | Redacted or Malformed Event | 18:18:04 |
| pe2bz | * Now, what if .....
I find one document pointing to Seasat 1 or Seasat A failing after 105 days of operation, that's have been operating on 2265.1 MHz.
http://www.svengrahn.pp.se/trackind/freqlist/SpaceFreq11.htm
If I enter 10967 for that frequency it appears at the moment of the 18:00 UTC signal. Does it make sense to try to find anything like Seasat's successors ?
I know that's a very long shot.... | 18:19:15 |
| sa2kng | 👁️ | 18:19:49 |
| pe2bz | Might be known, but if you have some time left http://www.svengrahn.pp.se/ | 18:43:15 |
 fredy | In reply to @pe2bz:matrix.org
Might be known, but if you have some time left http://www.svengrahn.pp.se/ haven't seen it before | 18:44:18 |
 kovirii | In reply to @pe2bz:matrix.org
Jan PE0SAT: can you check your signals against 58703 with 2265 MHz as frequency ? It's possible that could be one of the NanoFFs, the high end of their range is included at 2265 | 20:01:38 |
| Jan PE0SAT | In reply to @kovirii:matrix.org
It's possible that could be one of the NanoFFs, the high end of their range is included at 2265 I will keep that in mind the next time I monitor that range, I already removed the bin files. | 20:06:20 |
| kovirii | In reply to @pe2bz:matrix.org
Not close enough, but 58700 to 58703 are from 2024-01-05 launch so that could still be the source ? I think you're onto something with this | 20:18:50 |
| kovirii | NeonSat-1 and ACS3 launching today from RocketLab | 21:08:44 |
