| 19 Apr 2024 |
 nirik | intel is forcing you to buy their SPF modules? sheesh | 16:37:55 |
 jforbes | That is interesting indeed | 16:39:14 |
| nirik | ah there's a boot param to ignore that? | 16:40:30 |
| * nirik tries ixgbe.allow_unsupported_sfp=1 | 16:40:49 |
 Neil Hanlon | Yeah.. Intel be like that now :( | 16:42:50 |
| Neil Hanlon | fs.com Intel coded ones typically fool the check | 16:43:11 |
| nirik | ok, that didn't work... perhaps thats not the current param? looking | 16:45:08 |
| Neil Hanlon | is it possible it's being modprobed' back on? I forget if that is possible if you set a command line flag | 16:46:56 |
| nirik | doesn't seem to be. The problem seems to be that this is a 40G card, so it's using i40e, which I think might not have that option at all. | 16:55:49 |
| * Neil Hanlon makes sad trombone noises | 16:56:54 |
| Neil Hanlon | yeah the kernel source seems to say it's for "82599-based adapaters" which are the i10e ... | 16:57:40 |
| Neil Hanlon | a colleague of mine confirmed the solution is...
modifying the driver code 🙃 | 17:01:33 |
| Neil Hanlon | or seeing if you can trick it by using "Intel" optics | 17:02:01 |
| nirik | yeah. ;( In the mean time I have asked them to stick a 1G port on the right vlan to unblock things. | 17:02:08 |
| Neil Hanlon | we're only using 10G right? it just happens to be a 40G card? | 17:02:47 |
| nirik | right | 17:07:10 |
| 20 Apr 2024 |
 Eric Curtin | Would it be possible for CONFIG_HID_BPF to be built as a module? We've noticed having in directly built in isn't great for boot performance | 11:29:42 |
 Conan Kudo | In reply to @ecurtin:matrix.org
Would it be possible for CONFIG_HID_BPF to be built as a module? We've noticed having in directly built in isn't great for boot performance What do you mean by that? | 13:21:20 |
| Conan Kudo | In reply to @ecurtin:matrix.org
Would it be possible for CONFIG_HID_BPF to be built as a module? We've noticed having in directly built in isn't great for boot performance * What do you mean by that? And do the BPF people know this? | 13:21:38 |
| Conan Kudo | (by that, I mean the upstream BPF people, because HID BPF is going to be very important very soon, so having it as a module will become a bad idea very quickly) | 13:22:10 |
| 21 Apr 2024 |
|  Jelly Terra λ changed their profile picture. | 15:58:22 |
|  Luna Jernberg (Fedora resting time until 17-18th May 2024) changed their display name from Luna Jernberg to Luna Jernberg (Fedora resting time until 17-18th May 2024). | 17:39:36 |
| 22 Apr 2024 |
 jvoisin | In reply to @jvoisin:matrix.org
perfect, thanks! Given https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275162, I opened https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276375 instead | 11:08:52 |
| nirik | jforbes: ok, kernel02.iad2.fedoraproject.org should be up and ready... let me know if you want it reinstalled for any adjustments on disk, etc... or network. It's right now using a 1G eth0... we can fix the 10G connnections the next time someone is on site there. | 16:25:05 |
| jforbes | nirik @nirik:matrix.scrye.com: thanks. On PTO, i will check it when I get back to the hotel | 16:39:01 |
| nirik | no hurry! enjoy pto | 17:02:04 |
| 23 Apr 2024 |
|  Prarit Bhargava joined the room. | 15:20:42 |
|  Seth Meyer joined the room. | 21:52:04 |
| 25 Apr 2024 |
 eballetbo | hi, when I found this kind of error: 'kernel-aarch64-debug-fedora.config ... Found unset config items, please set them to an appropriate value' with a list of config symbols, there is a way to automatically add them or I should add one by one? | 13:22:57 |
| jforbes | eballetbo: I assume you are working in dist-git or with an srpm as opposed to working with the src git in kernel-ark? | 14:32:56 |
