Fedora Kernel

188 Members
Fedora Kernel8 Servers

Load older messages

25 Jan 2022
@jcajka:libera.chatjcajka joined the room.06:56:55
@dgilmore:libera.chatdgilmorejforbes, I got that weird output updating to 5.1614:09:47
@jforbes:libera.chatjforbesold selinux policy?14:11:10
@Guest88:libera.chatGuest88 joined the room.14:19:05
@pwhalen:libera.chatpwhalendgilmore: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201364214:40:43
@dgilmore:libera.chatdgilmorethanks pwhalen 14:44:51
@adamwill:fedora.imadamw jforbes: for the record, nirik and I managed to figure out why the gating status update problem we noticed with your update happened, it should be fixed by the next bodhi version once it's deployed 17:51:02
@jforbes:libera.chatjforbesexcellent news19:30:08
@salimma:fedora.imMichel Alexandre Salim 🎩 jforbes: not really, there's this user who's saying he can't compile Nvidia drivers with the current kernel-headers, but he's on 5.11 anyway and I encouraged him to upgrade. so I suppose kernel-headers matches that Fedora release's major and minor version, but not really the patch release, right? 22:33:22
@jforbes:libera.chatjforbes Michel Alexandre Salim 🎩: that would be generally correct, though even that is not necessary. Kernel-headers has absolutely nothing to do with nvidia drivers in Fedora, you need kernel-devel which is always built version matched 22:34:21
@jforbes:libera.chatjforbessee https://www.labbott.name/blog/2019/11/16/what-s-a-kernel-headers-package-anyway/ and http://thorstenl.blogspot.com/2021/01/package-names-can-be-false-friends-too.html22:34:50
@javierm:libera.chatjaviermyeah, kernel-headers is to build user-space programs that use it AFAIK22:38:09
@salimma:fedora.imMichel Alexandre Salim 🎩 javierm, jforbes aha, thanks 22:44:23
@salimma:fedora.imMichel Alexandre Salim 🎩I sort of knew this at some level, but ever since I stopped dealing with akmods on a daily basis I must have purged that from my memory ;)22:45:41
26 Jan 2022
@adunsmuir:libera.chatadunsmuir left the room.15:18:04
@adunsmuir:libera.chatadunsmuir joined the room.15:25:29
@spstarr:libera.chatspstarrkwizart: ping, um you built libglvnd but no 386 builds? that conflicts17:27:49
@spstarr:libera.chatspstarr Problem 1: libglvnd-1:1.4.0-1.fc36.i686 has inferior architecture17:28:59
@spstarr:libera.chatspstarr - cannot install both libglvnd-1:1.4.0-2.fc36.x86_64 and libglvnd-1:1.4.0-1.fc36.x86_6417:29:00
@spstarr:libera.chatspstarr - cannot install both libglvnd-1:1.4.0-1.fc36.x86_64 and libglvnd-1:1.4.0-2.fc36.x86_6417:29:00
@spstarr:libera.chatspstarr - cannot install the best update candidate for package libglvnd-1:1.4.0-1.fc36.i68617:29:00
@spstarr:libera.chatspstarr - cannot install the best update candidate for package libglvnd-1:1.4.0-1.fc36.x86_6417:29:01
@kwizart:libera.chatkwizartspstarr, right I need to remove them... (actually I was just working on a way to build i686 packages from a multilibs repository)17:29:26
@spstarr:libera.chatspstarrdoh :)17:29:33
@spstarr:libera.chatspstarrill exclude for now17:30:17
@kwizart:libera.chatkwizartno need to change anything, just refresh17:30:30
@voyager:t2bot.io@voyager:t2bot.io left the room.18:17:20

There are no newer messages yet.

Back to Room List