| 25 Jan 2022 |
|  jcajka joined the room. | 06:56:55 |
 dgilmore | https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/Pd5pHx2i/ | 14:09:24 |
| dgilmore | jforbes, I got that weird output updating to 5.16 | 14:09:47 |
 jforbes | old selinux policy? | 14:11:10 |
| dgilmore | maybe | 14:11:41 |
|  Guest88 joined the room. | 14:19:05 |
 pwhalen | dgilmore: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2013642 | 14:40:43 |
| dgilmore | thanks pwhalen | 14:44:51 |
 adamw | jforbes: for the record, nirik and I managed to figure out why the gating status update problem we noticed with your update happened, it should be fixed by the next bodhi version once it's deployed | 17:51:02 |
| jforbes | excellent news | 19:30:08 |
 Michel Alexandre Salim 🎩 | jforbes: not really, there's this user who's saying he can't compile Nvidia drivers with the current kernel-headers, but he's on 5.11 anyway and I encouraged him to upgrade. so I suppose kernel-headers matches that Fedora release's major and minor version, but not really the patch release, right? | 22:33:22 |
| jforbes | Michel Alexandre Salim 🎩: that would be generally correct, though even that is not necessary. Kernel-headers has absolutely nothing to do with nvidia drivers in Fedora, you need kernel-devel which is always built version matched | 22:34:21 |
| jforbes | see https://www.labbott.name/blog/2019/11/16/what-s-a-kernel-headers-package-anyway/ and http://thorstenl.blogspot.com/2021/01/package-names-can-be-false-friends-too.html | 22:34:50 |
 javierm | yeah, kernel-headers is to build user-space programs that use it AFAIK | 22:38:09 |
| Michel Alexandre Salim 🎩 | javierm, jforbes aha, thanks | 22:44:23 |
| Michel Alexandre Salim 🎩 | I sort of knew this at some level, but ever since I stopped dealing with akmods on a daily basis I must have purged that from my memory ;) | 22:45:41 |
| 26 Jan 2022 |
|  adunsmuir left the room. | 15:18:04 |
| adunsmuir joined the room. | 15:25:29 |
 spstarr | kwizart: ping, um you built libglvnd but no 386 builds? that conflicts | 17:27:49 |
| spstarr | Problem 1: libglvnd-1:1.4.0-1.fc36.i686 has inferior architecture | 17:28:59 |
| spstarr | - cannot install both libglvnd-1:1.4.0-2.fc36.x86_64 and libglvnd-1:1.4.0-1.fc36.x86_64 | 17:29:00 |
| spstarr | - cannot install both libglvnd-1:1.4.0-1.fc36.x86_64 and libglvnd-1:1.4.0-2.fc36.x86_64 | 17:29:00 |
| spstarr | - cannot install the best update candidate for package libglvnd-1:1.4.0-1.fc36.i686 | 17:29:00 |
| spstarr | - cannot install the best update candidate for package libglvnd-1:1.4.0-1.fc36.x86_64 | 17:29:01 |
 kwizart | spstarr, right I need to remove them... (actually I was just working on a way to build i686 packages from a multilibs repository) | 17:29:26 |
| spstarr | doh :) | 17:29:33 |
| spstarr | ill exclude for now | 17:30:17 |
| kwizart | no need to change anything, just refresh | 17:30:30 |
| spstarr | yep | 17:37:47 |
|  @voyager:t2bot.io left the room. | 18:17:20 |
