| 18 May 2023 |
|  hodapp joined the room. | 10:11:59 |
| 20 May 2023 |
|  Hamish McLean joined the room. | 16:11:12 |
|  @ralph:fx45.in left the room. | 22:47:37 |
| 23 May 2023 |
|  @trmt:matrix.org left the room. | 19:52:41 |
| 25 May 2023 |
|  Hervy Qurrotul Ainur joined the room. | 00:57:17 |
| Hervy Qurrotul Ainur changed their display name from Hervy Qurrotul Ainur to Hervy Qurrotul Ainur Rozi. | 01:02:20 |
| 1 Jun 2023 |
|  Dr. Chris Peters, PhD joined the room. | 10:59:13 |
| 5 Jun 2023 |
|  @bottine:matrix.org left the room. | 07:01:57 |
| 8 Jun 2023 |
|  @heday:matrix.org left the room. | 15:11:31 |
| 14 Jun 2023 |
|  @asapoema:matrix.org left the room. | 14:59:39 |
| 17 Jun 2023 |
|  bzbzbz1@matrix changed their display name from bzbzbz1 to bzbzbz1@matrix. | 09:11:34 |
|  Mr. Robot joined the room. | 15:00:24 |
| 21 Jun 2023 |
| Hamish McLean set a profile picture. | 19:04:09 |
| 23 Jun 2023 |
|  @sensed_landline:matrix.org left the room. | 04:55:37 |
| 25 Jun 2023 |
|  @tpoisot:matrix.org joined the room. | 17:39:47 |
| @tpoisot:matrix.org left the room. | 17:42:20 |
| 27 Jun 2023 |
|  headphonejack joined the room. | 17:54:53 |
| headphonejack | What editor is recommended on Linux to be used with Julia beside VSCode/VSCodium? Which editor knows of for example the conversion from \div to the appropiate symbol? | 18:05:58 |
 SixZero | I think vscode should also know it, but atom for sure knew it. | 20:30:39 |
| SixZero | probably there is an extension for it? :O | 20:30:48 |
 Hannes | In reply to @headphonejack:matrix.org
What editor is recommended on Linux to be used with Julia beside VSCode/VSCodium? Which editor knows of for example the conversion from \div to the appropiate symbol? With Vim/Neovim it's as easy as installing the plugin: https://github.com/JuliaEditorSupport/julia-vim | 23:32:36 |
| 28 Jun 2023 |
| headphonejack | Beside Helix I love NeoVim! :) That are good news - will check that | 02:07:31 |
| headphonejack | Thank you!!! | 02:07:38 |
| 29 Jun 2023 |
| headphonejack | Is it possible to use Julia fully when not having the ability to use the <latex command> sequences to enter special synbols? Are there aliases for those? | 02:19:53 |
| Hannes | In reply to @headphonejack:matrix.org
Is it possible to use Julia fully when not having the ability to use the <latex command> sequences to enter special synbols? Are there aliases for those? Yeah, I believe in the stdlib all the special characters are just aliases for functions, e.g. the × symbol for cross products is just an alias for the cross function.
In theory a package could define a function that can only be accessed using a special symbol, but not everyone chooses to use these symbols, so every package I've seen that has special symbols also has a longer function name as well. | 03:12:52 |
| Hannes | And if you do find a function that is only defined using a symbol then you can create an alias for it, I think the syntax would be something like this:
```
using AnnoyingPackage: §
const better_name = AnnoyingPackage.(:§)
``` | 03:15:12 |
| Hannes | * And if you do find a function that is only defined using a symbol then you can create an alias for it, I think the syntax would be something like this:
````
using AnnoyingPackage: §
const better_name = AnnoyingPackage.(:§)
```` | 03:15:35 |
| Hannes | * And if you do find a function that is only defined using a symbol then you can create an alias for it, I think the syntax would be something like this:
using AnnoyingPackage: §
const better_name = AnnoyingPackage.(:§) | 03:18:00 |
| Hannes | * And if you do find a function that is only defined using a symbol then you can create an alias for it, I think the syntax would be something like this: `const better_name = AnnoyingPackage.(:§)` | 03:18:20 |
| Hannes | Redacted or Malformed Event | 03:18:44 |
