7 Jul 2020 |
| @jodie2099:matrix.org joined the room. | 16:40:39 |
| @jodie2099:matrix.org left the room. | 21:57:58 |
8 Jul 2020 |
| @abbie9341:matrix.org joined the room. | 11:17:15 |
| @abbie9341:matrix.org left the room. | 11:39:01 |
17 Jul 2020 |
jorgepiloto | Hello everyone, I would like to execute the tox -e coverage and got a InterpreterNotFound . I am not sure why this happens, since I have both poliastro py37 and py38 environments installation... | 07:51:26 |
juanluastro | Hi jorgepiloto ! Can you try to upgrade to the latest `tox` version and, if the error persists, share the complete traceback here? | 08:12:48 |
jorgepiloto | Although I upgraded tox in both py37 and py38 it still raises same error | 08:42:08 |
juanluastro | Hmmm weird. jorgepiloto could you please paste the full traceback here? | 08:46:28 |
jorgepiloto | Sure!
build create: /home/user/Git/poliastro/.tox/build
build installdeps: flit_core >=2.0,<3, wheel, oldest-supported-numpy
coverage create: /home/user/Git/poliastro/.tox/coverage
ERROR: InterpreterNotFound:
________________summary _____________________________________
ERROR: coverage: InterpreterNotFound
| 08:51:59 |
juanluastro | ...that's it? 😮 | 08:57:31 |
juanluastro | Oh wait, it complains about `coverage` in particular | 08:57:51 |
juanluastro | Do `tox -e py38` and `tox -e py37` work? | 08:58:29 |
jorgepiloto | Yes, both of them (when activating proper python version) work fine | 09:05:52 |
astrojuanlu | "when activating proper python version", I see | 09:06:55 |
astrojuanlu | I can reproduce the InterpreterNotFound locally when activating a Python 3.8 environment | 09:07:43 |
astrojuanlu | oh, I see! | 09:08:02 |
astrojuanlu | jorgepiloto: tox -e coverage does not exist anymore | 09:08:11 |
astrojuanlu | it's a modifier | 09:08:16 |
astrojuanlu | you should do tox -e py38-coverage instead | 09:08:23 |
jorgepiloto | Oh, you are right! It works perfectly now 👍️ | 09:11:01 |
21 Jul 2020 |
astrojuanlu | hmm one image test started failing recently https://dev.azure.com/poliastro/poliastro/_build/results?buildId=432&view=logs&j=224dca52-90b1-5bb4-7139-80c0f58a1377&t=85042604-239a-5905-a5b5-a5471e9dc052&l=44 | 08:29:59 |
astrojuanlu | on July 17th they released matplotlib 3.3.0, perhaps that's the reason | 08:30:34 |
jorgepiloto | I upgraded to matplotlib latest version and can reproduce the failing test. Output image seems to be exactly the same, should be fixed by running pytest --mpl-generate-path=baseline test_porkchop.py and update output test figure. Do you want me to fix this? | 10:19:51 |
juanluastro | Yeah please, go ahead! | 10:37:41 |
9 Nov 2020 |
astrojuanlu | https://matrix.to/#/!sENfoZnXsOePhaLRJE:matrix.org/$pbACNb6DAiTY-dINl9npC2JK4jHzbxBuGqpBtbPy81M?via=matrix.org&via=atrz.de&via=cadair.com | 11:15:22 |
9 Jan 2021 |
astrojuanlu | this looks very cool! https://github.com/select/matrix-message-e2e | 20:02:49 |
21 Mar 2021 |
| ishansrt joined the room. | 19:45:35 |
30 Mar 2021 |
| xlxs4 joined the room. | 16:01:24 |
31 Mar 2021 |
| xlxs4 changed their profile picture. | 07:59:08 |
8 Apr 2021 |
| Aman Goel joined the room. | 20:47:29 |