| 17 May 2022 |
 Youglowslavia | I see them extremely useful for debugging, but not many people do this, so I am probably missing something | 17:02:39 |
| Youglowslavia | Like - I am worried I might be doing something dumbs | 17:02:55 |
| Youglowslavia | * Like - I am worried I might be doing something dumb | 17:02:56 |
| Youglowslavia | In reply to @dalek:anontier.nl
Do you guys use __FILE__ and/or __LINE__ variables ? Not sure how I found out about these, I think I was reading some lib's code xD | 17:03:14 |
 marcthe12 | In reply to @dalek:anontier.nl
Have you tried vi? o.o
I can share a link to my vi configuration if you would like. I am interested since I sometimes use the orginal vi. | 17:13:38 |
| Youglowslavia | Yeah, I was always confused and I messed shit up when only Vi was installed, and I had to edit something before installing Vim. | 17:14:49 |
| Youglowslavia | Don't be scared of the unknown :) | 17:15:07 |
| marcthe12 | I have use ed so its not a prob. I just want to be better at the posix stuff. | 17:17:57 |
| Youglowslavia | Me too xD when DistroTube made a video about it. | 17:18:51 |
 name_missing | I do use line and file.
However if i compile with debug then its not strictly nessary as any good debugger can tell u that information too.
When i use them its for special debugging when something is remote and i can not attach a debugger. | 17:36:30 |
| name_missing | * I do use __LINE__ and ``FILE`.
However if i compile with debug then its not strictly nessary as any good debugger can tell u that information too.
When i use them its for special debugging when something is remote and i can not attach a debugger. | 17:37:18 |
| name_missing | * I do use __LINE__ and __FILE__.
However if i compile with debug then its not strictly nessary as any good debugger can tell u that information too.
When i use them its for special debugging when something is remote and i can not attach a debugger. | 17:37:33 |
| name_missing | There even is __FUNC__ with some compilers. | 17:37:51 |
| Youglowslavia | In reply to @name_missing:matrix.org
There even is __FUNC__ with some compilers. Not necessary if the former two are present :0 | 17:38:52 |
| Youglowslavia | In reply to @name_missing:matrix.org
There even is __FUNC__ with some compilers. * Not necessary if the former two are present. | 17:38:56 |
| Youglowslavia |
I do use __LINE__ and __FILE__.
Thank you very much :)
| 17:39:11 |
| 18 May 2022 |
 those who know me have no need of my name | FUNC isn't standard where __func__ is. | 00:42:01 |
 torstenvl | I think func became standard in C99, really no reason to use compiler-specific FUNC | 05:08:34 |
| torstenvl | Even if it was C11, that's over a decade ago | 05:09:11 |
| torstenvl | In reply to @dalek:anontier.nl
Like - I am worried I might be doing something dumb I typically use the __FILE__ etc macros as part of a DBUG() or TRACE() macro that logs messages in debug builds only and gets defined to ((void)0) otherwise. | 05:11:19 |
| name_missing | #define __FUNC__ __func__ 🙈
For application back end logging i always wanted to use Graphana with InfluxDB.
If there is an error ask the use to report.
Then if accepted show some ticket id and send the data to the backend. | 06:42:16 |
|  Dyskos joined the room. | 09:29:27 |
| Youglowslavia | In reply to @torstenvl:matrix.org
I typically use the __FILE__ etc macros as part of a DBUG() or TRACE() macro that logs messages in debug builds only and gets defined to ((void)0) otherwise. What do you mean by "and gets defined to ((void)0) otherwise."? | 17:23:10 |
| torstenvl | In reply to @dalek:anontier.nl
What do you mean by "and gets defined to ((void)0) otherwise."? https://pastebin.com/BuRp9P3J | 17:59:28 |
| Youglowslavia | Does anyone here write program(s) in machine code, or has even tried to? Is it even possible? :D | 18:00:51 |
| torstenvl | I had to in college as part of my computer arch / assembly language class. 32-bit SPARC machine code. Fun fun. | 18:06:13 |
| Youglowslavia | In reply to @torstenvl:matrix.org
https://pastebin.com/BuRp9P3J Quite interesting!
But isn't "pragma" a new standard thing? | 18:37:40 |
| Youglowslavia | In reply to @torstenvl:matrix.org
I had to in college as part of my computer arch / assembly language class. 32-bit SPARC machine code. Fun fun. Damn! I wish I was there! | 18:38:02 |
| Youglowslavia | In reply to @torstenvl:matrix.org
I had to in college as part of my computer arch / assembly language class. 32-bit SPARC machine code. Fun fun. * BLAST I wish I was there! | 18:38:07 |
| Youglowslavia | * BLAST! I wish I was there! | 18:38:10 |
