| 8 Aug 2023 |
|  fhy_18 joined the room. | 17:14:38 |
| 9 Aug 2023 |
|  sawali joined the room. | 05:30:42 |
|  Sonan joined the room. | 14:14:40 |
|  danie69 joined the room. | 19:44:44 |
| 10 Aug 2023 |
|  usernameisJim changed their display name from usernameisJim to usernameisjim#0. | 02:21:19 |
| usernameisJim changed their display name from usernameisjim#0 to usernameisjim. | 02:21:23 |
|  jjgeaux joined the room. | 05:53:57 |
|  kuhl joined the room. | 14:58:35 |
| 11 Aug 2023 |
 ethantuttle | Does anyone have a PR review method that is convenient? I'd like something that leverages an LSP and maybe was specifically designed to merging git for the UX. I just use GitHub webview and it's good but I'm hoping there's something very good. | 01:24:53 |
| ethantuttle | fwiw, I've messed with neovim and they probably have something that would fit. Maybe I should learn to split screen the buffers so I can have a code editor with LSP on one pane, and the git diff on the other.... 🤔 | 01:26:18 |
 manmeet (maan2003) | I used https://github.com/sindrets/diffview.nvim with neovim
it has lsp support | 01:26:48 |
| ethantuttle | ty!!! | 01:27:20 |
| manmeet (maan2003) | * I used https://github.com/sindrets/diffview.nvim with neovim
it has lsp support for both old and new buffers | 01:27:28 |
| ethantuttle | This looks exactly like what I was imaginging. | 01:28:21 |
| manmeet (maan2003) | BTW https://github.com/Wilfred/difftastic has much better diffs for code because it diffs syntax trees not just the text | 01:29:14 |
| ethantuttle | those seem like they'd work together? | 01:33:48 |
| manmeet (maan2003) | nope, unfortunately there is no neovim integration | 01:34:24 |
| 13 Aug 2023 |
|  .andrew231 joined the room. | 19:17:12 |
|  .alexbrest joined the room. | 22:25:20 |
| 14 Aug 2023 |
|  subtrop1cal joined the room. | 00:32:29 |
|  erskingardner changed their display name from erskingardner to erskingardner#0. | 13:09:32 |
| erskingardner changed their display name from erskingardner#0 to erskingardner. | 13:09:33 |
| erskingardner changed their display name from erskingardner to erskingardner#0. | 13:13:00 |
| erskingardner changed their display name from erskingardner#0 to erskingardner. | 13:13:01 |
|  Erin | murph☘ joined the room. | 15:01:49 |
|  psychopunk_sage joined the room. | 19:02:39 |
| ethantuttle | https://fountain.fm/show/lfo1OoVEF4wNFrcxdg9Q
TIL | 20:35:40 |
| 15 Aug 2023 |
|  Jason | NOAH changed their display name from Jason | NOAH to geekigai#0. | 18:57:12 |
| ethantuttle | Tell me why my idea sucks so we can make it better:
Fedimint Ded Drp
- Allow a user to send ecash to npub
1. Encrypt using nostimint’s npub and send to nostimint
a. npub of recipient
b. ecash is encrypted with npub of recipient
2. deddrp creates contract (similar to LN gateway)
3. Recipient queries for any outstanding contracts for their npub
4. Receives encrypted ecash after “unlocking” contract
5. decrypt, then use ecash as normal
Was thinking about nostr and fedimint and thought that a whitelist of npubs just creates an account model that is no bueno for privacy. The cryptographic primitives don't have to be nostr either, you could encrypt Step 1.b with any sort of key material. (I think) | 20:41:24 |
| ethantuttle | nostimint would be a nostr key module for the actual federation*** | 20:45:09 |
