!RiPDGrdCYgVcyxoGfW:matrix.org

Fedimint Off-Topic

811 Members
3 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
15 Aug 2023
@_discord_455418414953922571:t2bot.iogeekigai#0 changed their profile picture.21:02:42
@_discord_915943031310532620:t2bot.iograft_dev joined the room.23:25:33
@_discord_1106209895818199131:t2bot.ioethantuttle Apparently Cashu does something similar. 23:38:34
16 Aug 2023
@_discord_89396062619459584:t2bot.iousernameisjim changed their display name from usernameisjim to usernameisjim#0.04:45:21
@_discord_89396062619459584:t2bot.iousernameisjim changed their display name from usernameisjim#0 to usernameisjim.04:45:26
@_discord_870577128951930911:t2bot.iohodladi joined the room.06:08:04
@_discord_505862361609928715:t2bot.iorobclarkson joined the room.10:11:12
@_discord_913133336749305856:t2bot.ioelsirion#3472 What would the "Receives encrypted ecash after “unlocking” contract" step be like? Sounds like sending e-cash via a normal nostr DM without the federration being involved would also work? What feature am I missing? Essentially, why the contract? 12:47:39
@_discord_1106209895818199131:t2bot.ioethantuttle I'll have to think on this some more. My immediate thought is it's the location of the ecash. One is stored on the relay and the other is stored on the fedimint. network accessibility comes to mind but this might be very niche. 12:51:34
@_discord_913133336749305856:t2bot.ioelsirion#3472 That can be solved by each guardians also running a relay instead of making it a fedimint module since there is no consensus required. As long as one guardian is honest and keeps the message for the user everything is ok. 12:56:39
@_discord_618499317421834245:t2bot.ioniftynei joined the room.21:04:35
@_discord_415395641653592065:t2bot.iogumball.exe joined the room.22:22:08
17 Aug 2023
@_discord_783028644796301322:t2bot.iotelelvis joined the room.14:19:54
@_discord_999685318158602331:t2bot.iom1sterc001guy 👀 https://opensats.org/blog/bitcoin-and-nostr-grants-august-2023 14:55:37
@_discord_1141842157133631650:t2bot.iosimon_59605 joined the room.21:14:04
18 Aug 2023
@_discord_1131842372305694800:t2bot.ioadyst_id joined the room.08:24:50
@_discord_547403955668254720:t2bot.iomichael1011 joined the room.13:03:50
@_discord_1142108788887916686:t2bot.ioshaurya947_61140 joined the room.14:53:03
@_discord_332755519561400320:t2bot.iodpc#0812image.png
Download image.png
18:07:54
@_discord_332755519561400320:t2bot.iodpc#0812 I rebased and force pushed a PR that already had an approval, and surprisingly ... it stayed approved.

Was it working like this before, or is it a new thing? https://github.com/fedimint/fedimint/pull/2978
18:07:55
@_discord_1106209895818199131:t2bot.ioethantuttle was there a delta in the files or just commit history cleanup? 18:45:06
@_discord_391409877324660736:t2bot.ioEvanFeenstra changed their display name from EvanFeenstra to middlew4y#0.18:59:15
@_discord_391409877324660736:t2bot.ioEvanFeenstra changed their display name from middlew4y#0 to middlew4y.18:59:25
@_discord_296323839845990401:t2bot.iostachurski joined the room.19:34:17
@_discord_296323839845990401:t2bot.iostachurskiScreenshot_2023-08-18_at_1.30.48_PM.png
Download Screenshot_2023-08-18_at_1.30.48_PM.png
19:34:19
@_discord_296323839845990401:t2bot.iostachurski I'm curious if someone with permissions can verify Dismiss stale pull request approvals when new commits are pushed is enabled 19:34:19
@_discord_332755519561400320:t2bot.iodpc#0812 Just a rebase, no changes 19:35:56
@_discord_171017855813419008:t2bot.iowbobeirne I think gh might be smart enough to know when there are meaningful changes to dismiss reviews, but maybe I'm making that up 19:40:03
@_discord_1106209895818199131:t2bot.ioethantuttle that was my thought. 🤷‍♂️ 20:00:10
@_discord_665009783354425344:t2bot.iojustinmoon#6976 I m curious if someone with permissions 20:18:01

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9