Így van. Már a vicc is hibás:

• Nincs számítógépem. Elérhető könyv formájában is az Internet?

Holott a www már (elméletileg) elérhető lenne nyomtatott formában is.

De az tényleg nem értelmezhető, hogy nyomtassak ki egy interaktív telnet vagy nethack munkamenetet. Jó, persze mindig ott a play by mail mint lassított szimuláció - levelezőlapon is küldhetnénk hexában az IP csomagokat végső soron

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carriers

Így van. Már a vicc is hibás:

• Nincs számítógépem. Elérhető könyv formájában is az Internet?

Ugyanakkor a www már (elméletileg) elérhető lenne nyomtatott formában is.

Az tényleg nem értelmezhető, hogy nyomtassak ki egy interaktív telnet vagy nethack munkamenetet. Jó, persze mindig ott a play by mail mint lassított szimuláció - levelezőlapon is küldhetnénk hexában az IP csomagokat végső soron

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carriers

Return to Innocence
a computer from 2014 is just about as powerful as the one you bought as a Christmas gift in 2023, bar the amount of RAM or the speed and capacity of the SSDs therein. On the other hand, consumer PCs of 2014 were, by all standards, widely superior to those of 2004, and immensely more than those of 1994 and, needless to say, 1984.
Retrocomputing, then, emerges not only as a fun, recreational activity, but also as one with widely applicable skills, particularly for those working in sustainable computing, and those spreading its use in regions of the world where it has not yet reached peak maturity, and where refurbishing old hardware is an effective way to raise standards of living through computer technology. In this age of rising temperatures and rising oceans, reusing old computers is a very valuable skill. /cc #Számítógépes írástudás elősegítése #Szép korú gépek

I tested 9 different versions of 32bit Puppy Linux, and my choice to continue testing was FocalPup32. It comes with Light Web Browser preinstalled. On my computer, FocalPup32 uses around 90MB RAM when idling after a pristine install, and around 145 MB RAM with the Light Web Browser opened.
* https://forum.puppylinux.com/viewtopic.php?f=144&t=405
* https://forum.puppylinux.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3276
* https://forum.puppylinux.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3245
* https://forum.puppylinux.com/viewtopic.php?f=119&t=692
Light Web Browser is a cutdown of an old Firefox version (about 6 years old). You will have problems accessing some modern sites, so depending on your browsing needs it may turn out to be too outdated. I think most users of Puppy with older hardware use Palemoon which is also the easiest to get to run if you are using an older version of Puppy.

Ubuntu Linux Evaluating x86-64-v3 Based Build - AVX & Newer Intel/AMD CPUs
Optimising Ubuntu performance on amd64 architecture
This basically would limit the Intel and AMD CPU support on Ubuntu Linux to roughly ~2015 era hardware and newer. It's roughly Intel Haswell era processors and newer.

Nem volt asszisztens a váci orvosi ügyeleten, ezért csak a városi kórház gyerekosztályán kapott ellátást egy fulladó kisfiú március 15-én reggel – erről a gyerek szülei számoltak be a Híradónak. Az apa szerint az orvos nem tudott belépni a számítógépes rendszerbe, ezért kellett máshová fordulniuk. A mentőszolgálat szerint az asszisztens csak késett, és az orvosok egyedül is képesek használni az informatikai rendszert. A Magyar Orvosi Kamara szerint azonban a jelenlegi szoftver akadályozza a munkát.
A mentőszolgálattól pedig 45 percen keresztül hiába próbáltak telefonon segítséget kérni. „Végül a doktornő megvizsgálta a gyerekünket, de onnan továbblépni nem tudott, vényköteles gyógyszert nem tudott felírni, a rendszerbe se lépett be, papír alapon rögzítette, hogy mi volt.”
a számítógépes rendszerbe az ügyeletes orvos „magától is képes belépni, nem szükséges hozzá asszisztencia”.

How web bloat impacts users with slow devices - danluu.com
On a slow device with high bandwidth, any lightweight, static, page works well, and lightweight dynamic pages can work well if designed for performance. Heavy, dynamic, pages are doomed unless the page weight doesn't cause the page to be complex. With low bandwidth and/or poor connectivity, lightweight pages are fine.
It's still the case that many users don't have broadband speeds, both inside and outside of the U.S. and that much of the modern web isn't usable for people with slow internet, but the exponential increase in bandwidth (Neilsen suggests…
Today, most page loads come from mobile and even the fastest mobile devices aren't as fast as a c4.xlarge; most mobile devices are much slower than the fastest mobile devices. Most desktop page loads will also be from a machine that's slower than a c4.xlarge. If you think about it for a few minutes, there are a lot of optimizations that browsers could do for people on slow connections, but because they don't, the best current solution for user

Just as an aside, something I've found funny for a long time is that I get quite a bit of hate mail about the styling on this page (and a similar volume of appreciation mail). By hate mail, I don't mean polite suggestions to change things, I mean the equivalent of road rage, but for web browsing; web rage. I know people who run sites that are complex enough that they're unusable by a significant fraction of people in the world. How come people are so incensed about the styling of this site and, proportionally, basically don't care at all that the web is unusable for so many people?
Another funny thing here is that the people who appreciate the styling generally appreciate that the site doesn't override any kind of default styling, letting you make the width exactly what you want (by setting your window size how you want it) and it also doesn't override any kind of default styling you apply to sites. The people who are really insistent about this want everyone to have some width limit they prefer, some font they prefer, etc., but it's always framed in a way as if they don't want it, it's really for the benefit of people at large even though accommodating the preferences of the web ragers would directly oppose the preferences of people who prefer (just for example) to be able to adjust the text width by adjusting their window width.
It's great that Chrome lets you conveniently simulate a slower device from the convenience of your computer, but just enabling Chrome's CPU throttling

M3 Max, M1 Pro, M3/10, Tecno S8C, Itel P32 (2018, MT6580M Quad-core 1.3GHz, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 5.5" LCD 720x1440, 1GB RAM, 8GB storage, 4000mAh battery, Android 8.1 Oreo Go, USB OTG, dual micro SIM, 2G/3G)

* Gesture navigation's lack of discoverability is a problem for sure, although I'm not sure how to best address it (people aren't likely to sit through tutorials...)
* You have to do tutorials. Actually, why isn't there a UI tutorial app which is basically just practice for all the different BS ways UI writers invent to do the same things? It should come pre-installed. Like a DuoLingo for user interfaces! Heck, make sure it covers as many common interface paradigms as possible!