| 15 Jan 2025 |
 Tak! | none of the software or configuration on my instance has changed recently | 05:32:42 |
| Tak! | e.g. https://glitch.taks.garden/@Tak/113817634131578660
https://glitch.taks.garden/@Tak/113817635969608851 | 05:38:13 |
 connyduck | So Pixelfed is gaining quite some traction currently. And they advertise that Tusky works with Pixelfed. Unfortunately the Pixelfed implementation of the Mastodon Api is not perfect yet and there are quite some bugs. Ofc I get a lot of complaints about that. | 19:03:54 |
| connyduck | I would be very glad if someone could systematically test Tusky + Pixelfed, find those bugs, find the responsible Api endpoint and report the problem to Pixelfed. I currently don't have the time for that. | 19:05:25 |
| connyduck | Usually its them sending Json we cannot deserialize, stuff is null that shouldn't be, typo in some parameter etc | 19:06:25 |
 rauschen_ | so it does work at all again, in theory? i gave up on pixelfed eventually because it did not work with tusky any longer for quite a while (at least for me it didn't) | 19:15:47 |
 Argyle13 | But since Pixelfed has now its own official app, I guess most of the new people will go for it and not try with tusky | 19:22:35 |
| rauschen_ | I'd think if they do more in the fediverse than just pixelfed they will likely be interested in Tusky to avoid multiple apps? | 19:33:15 |
 Kevin P. Fleming | I'm not sure about that; there's a large difference Tusky being able to talk to Pixelfed, and Tusky providing all the client-side features that the Pixelfed apps do. Pixelfed has a lot of features which don't exist in Mastodon. | 19:48:30 |
| rauschen_ | True, there are good reasons to use one or the other or even both I guess | 20:11:06 |
| rauschen_ | For me it's great to see it works with Tusky again (just tried) 😌 | 20:12:21 |
| 16 Jan 2025 |
|  Christopher Parker changed their profile picture. | 19:46:44 |
| Christopher Parker changed their profile picture. | 19:47:33 |
| Christopher Parker changed their display name from 𝕮𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖔𝖕𝖍𝖊𝖗 𝕮. 𝕻𝖆𝖗𝖐𝖊𝖗 to Christopher Parker. | 19:48:49 |
| 22 Jan 2025 |
 lakoja | Does anyone also notice the following?
With my Samsung (S21) with Android 14 notifications usually are also shown when the screen is off - as a short popup.
Only Tusky doesn't do this. The notification sound however is played.
Generally notification settings in the system for Tusky look ok (everything allowed and activated).
However I don't know what to search for in an internet search to describe this problem... | 21:39:13 |
| 23 Jan 2025 |
| connyduck | I'd guess that is controlled by the importance on the notification channel | 18:24:42 |
| Tak! | is it intended, if I click accept on the preview screen of a filtered notification, that the "you have N filtered notifications" banner is updated/removed when I go back to the notifications tab? | 19:19:53 |
| connyduck | I think so | 19:27:30 |
| 24 Jan 2025 |
| Tak! | ok, it seems like it isn't, and I need to manually refresh
(not a big deal from my perspective, but if it's meant to update dynamically, then it didn't work for me with this flow) | 07:15:51 |
| 25 Jan 2025 |
| lakoja | Doesn't look like it. Nor is it the visibility (public/private) or the category (social/message) of the notification itself. | 16:39:29 |
| 26 Jan 2025 |
|  fsrm97 joined the room. | 05:16:37 |
| connyduck | Have you recreated the channels? I think they can't be updated once created | 07:06:30 |
| 29 Jan 2025 |
| lakoja | Another odd problem: Sometimes Tusky cannot use the network.
I see an UnknownHostException in the log when trying to contact the server for notifications.
Maybe the precondition here is that Tusky never actually ran (since a device start). Only the broadcast receiver and subsequently the workers are active...
Does that make sense? | 19:25:56 |
| connyduck | Not really, but on the other hand it wouldn't be the weirdest thing that Android is doing | 20:01:51 |
| 31 Jan 2025 |
|  @galuriotgalex:matrix.org left the room. | 07:15:10 |
|  @lichingyun:matrix.org left the room. | 13:02:10 |
| 1 Feb 2025 |
 nailyk | Just upgraded to Tusky Test 27.2-da3e8d34
Did you do something with the threads/scrolling ?
It feel suddenly even smoother than it used to be 🤔 | 11:32:02 |
| lakoja | The plot thickens somewhat:
This problem (network not working for the Tusky worker; Unknownhost) seems be to happening a lot.
At least it always happens when I hadn't the device on for some time (minutes or more). Looking afterwards in the log:
The push notification does arrive (broadcast receiver is called and worker ist executed) but subsequently the actual call for notifications does not work.
I tried a retry loop with waiting a few seconds. But I have the feeling that this (sleeping) is not supported in workers?
Anyways the network seems to be there actually. Otherwise the push notification would not have been received...
But maybe this is a very special problem on my device?
On the other hand this would fit somehow many of the bug reports or google ratings claiming that "notifications don't work at all".
Maybe there is someone reading this and wants to share experiences with Tusky notification performance? | 12:21:55 |
| 2 Feb 2025 |
| connyduck | there is no da3e8d34 🤔 | 10:25:42 |
| 3 Feb 2025 |
| nailyk | 🙀 | 16:43:53 |
