| 22 Jan 2021 |
 Sorunome | then it is very, very badly worded ^^" | 19:06:34 |
 Nico | Could also be someone spreading bad faith arguments, because there was one issue that got locked, after a commenter started to attack people directly about being slow or so | 19:07:15 |
| 23 Jan 2021 |
|  dorisgetzeroates joined the room. | 10:01:01 |
 Erkin Alp | https://people.csail.mit.edu/vinodv/6892-Fall2013/rothblum.pdf
any opinion on this? can we use that kind of transformation to add homomorphic public key crypto to matrix, so the server can do ops on the encrypted form of the data, further improving matrix' privacy? | 10:36:29 |
| Erkin Alp | * https://people.csail.mit.edu/vinodv/6892-Fall2013/rothblum.pdf
any opinion on this? can we use that kind of transformation to add homomorphic public key crypto to matrix, so the server can do ops on the encrypted form of the data, further improving matrix' privacy? | 10:36:47 |
| ![@freenode_Zedek[m]1:matrix.org](./avatar/Zedek%5Bm%5D1) Zedek[m]1 joined the room. | 21:01:03 |
|  deluuxe joined the room. | 21:59:54 |
| deluuxe left the room. | 22:12:17 |
| 24 Jan 2021 |
|  [uhoreg] joined the room. | 03:06:02 |
|  Cnly changed their display name from cnly to Cnly. | 07:08:56 |
| 25 Jan 2021 |
 Half-Shot | How do spec items end up in the left hand column on https://github.com/orgs/matrix-org/projects/31? | 11:22:44 |
| Half-Shot | As I think there are far more proposals waiting for feedback, but unsure if there is an extra level you need to meet first. | 11:23:31 |
 anoa | They're added as-needed. Feel free to ask in here about adding your proposal and someone can give a sanity pass. | 11:26:51 |
|  lorico left the room. | 16:00:38 |
|  cognifloyd (Jacob Floyd) joined the room. | 18:50:38 |
| cognifloyd (Jacob Floyd) | based on https://matrix.org/docs/spec/proposals#id104, it looks like no implementation is needed until something moves from being a "proposal" to a "spec PR" (or about when a proposal hits the final comment period).
Is that correct? | 18:52:50 |
| Nico | Yeah, you can make your proposal first, then have someone implement it | 18:54:46 |
 uhoreg | It depends. MSCs need some "evidence that it works" before FCP. For some MSCs, it's "obvious" that it works, and so an implementation isn't needed, but for anything else, an implementation of some sort is usually the preferred way to show that it works. | 18:59:10 |
| lorico joined the room. | 20:30:18 |
| 26 Jan 2021 |
 KB1RD | If an invite-only room is tombstoned, how do users join the new room? | 03:41:40 |
 TravisR | with an invite | 03:41:49 |
| TravisR | the room upgrade system was intentionally introduced knowing that private (invite only) rooms would be on the losing end | 03:42:15 |
| TravisR | (fwiw the reasons why you'd upgrade a private room are not super prominent at the moment, so it's largely considered a non-issue for now) | 03:42:58 |
|  finn left the room. | 09:00:12 |
|  piegames left the room. | 09:00:24 |
|  niceplaces left the room. | 12:00:43 |
|  kiwi_83 left the room. | 12:00:43 |
|  MichaelRaskin left the room. | 12:00:43 |
 mscbot | [MSC2366] "MSC2366: Key verification flow additions: m.key.verification.ready and m.key.verification.done" has now entered final comment period!: https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/pull/2366 | 17:05:41 |
|  thoth joined the room. | 18:48:45 |
