1 Dec 2023 |
ヘルタ | In reply to 346 这种可以直接把河改隧道了吧🤣 但它也确实完全符合桥的定义 | 15:07:42 |
Z_ E | In reply to 快乐的老鼠宝宝 This message is not supported on your version of Mautrix-Telegram. Please check https://github.com/mautrix/telegram or ask your bridge administrator about possible updates. 这桥的西北边怎么伸出去这么多不用的地方? | 15:10:04 |
Z_ E | In reply to 快乐的老鼠宝宝 This message is not supported on your version of Mautrix-Telegram. Please check https://github.com/mautrix/telegram or ask your bridge administrator about possible updates. 甚至也铺了沥青 | 15:10:30 |
Colin Zhao | In reply to 快乐的老鼠宝宝 This message is not supported on your version of Mautrix-Telegram. Please check https://github.com/mautrix/telegram or ask your bridge administrator about possible updates. 看起来是受下面有地铁线路的影响 | 15:15:23 |
Colin Zhao |  Download image.jpeg | 15:15:12 |
Colin Zhao | 当初公示的设计方案图 | 15:15:12 |
Colin Zhao | * 看起来奇葩的形状是受下面有地铁线路的影响 | 15:16:01 |
Colin Zhao |  Download * image.jpeg | 15:16:56 |
Colin Zhao | * 看起来奇葩的形状应该就是受下面有地铁线路的影响 | 15:17:34 |
Colin Zhao | In reply to Z_ E 这桥的西北边怎么伸出去这么多不用的地方? 可能夹角太小不好做吧 | 15:17:59 |
Colin Zhao |  Download image.jpeg | 15:21:32 |
Colin Zhao | 实地 | 15:21:32 |
Colin Zhao |  Download * image.jpeg | 15:22:11 |
Colin Zhao | * 可能夹角太小不好做吧,而且方案图上看也有一部分是给规划红线预留的 | 15:25:53 |
Colin Zhao | * 可能夹角太小不好做吧,而且从方案图上的规划红线也能看出来有一部分是给将来预留的 | 15:27:04 |
Colin Zhao |  Download image.jpeg | 15:37:27 |
Colin Zhao | 这张与现状是相符的,但全网只有这一张模糊的图(http://www.fodev.com/attachments/2021/12/1639100874c2d9e0ad9e5c94aa.jpg ) | 15:37:27 |
Colin Zhao |  Download * image.jpeg | 15:38:23 |
🧑🏻🎤 🌏 | In reply to 快乐的老鼠宝宝 This message is not supported on your version of Mautrix-Telegram. Please check https://github.com/mautrix/telegram or ask your bridge administrator about possible updates. 有什么所谓 没影响吧 | 16:53:19 |
🧑🏻🎤 🌏 | In reply to Z_ E 在OSM里名字可以标为“沈丘服务区(濮新高速阳新方向)”和“沈丘服务区(濮新高速濮阳方向)”,其他高速上的同理 其实不标也行啊 | 16:53:12 |
346 | In reply to ヘルタ 但它也确实完全符合桥的定义 但应该也可以说底下的是tunnel=flooded?(开始分不清 | 16:52:01 |
Steve Lee | In reply to 346 但应该也可以说底下的是tunnel=flooded?(开始分不清 既不是tunnel,更不flooded | 16:56:11 |
346 | In reply to Steve Lee 既不是tunnel,更不flooded 那是怎么定义的呢 | 16:59:18 |
Z_ E | In reply to 🧑🏻🎤 🌏 其实不标也行啊 随便你啦,我又没强迫谁,不过是能够完善、以及为出现冲突和易混淆时提供一个解决办法就更好啊。 | 17:08:02 |
Steve Lee | In reply to 346 那是怎么定义的呢 这么奇怪的形状显然是为了桥桩避让地铁,与涵洞扯不上关系。flooded一般是用在引水隧洞,若真是下穿道路的涵洞也是culvert | 17:28:27 |
Steve Lee | In reply to 快乐的老鼠宝宝 This message is not supported on your version of Mautrix-Telegram. Please check https://github.com/mautrix/telegram or ask your bridge administrator about possible updates. 涵洞必有人造底面,桥不需底面 | 17:32:21 |
Steve Lee | * 涵洞必有支撑结构的涵底,桥只靠墩基维持结构稳定。 | 18:18:59 |
Steve Lee | * 涵洞必有支撑结构的涵底,桥只靠墩基维持结构稳定。上例桥下水面是连续的,道路显然要用桥才能跨越 | 18:21:37 |
| ᡃ⃝𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭南山少帅Feᷠ᪻ᷠ᪻᪻ᷠ᪻᪻᪻ᷠ᪻᪻᪻᪻ᷠ᪻᪻᪻ᷠ᪻᪻ᷠ᪻lix𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭 changed their display name from 南山少帅Felix to ᡃ⃝𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭南山少帅Felix𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭. | 19:49:15 |
| ᡃ⃝𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭南山少帅Feᷠ᪻ᷠ᪻᪻ᷠ᪻᪻᪻ᷠ᪻᪻᪻᪻ᷠ᪻᪻᪻ᷠ᪻᪻ᷠ᪻lix𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭 changed their display name from ᡃ⃝𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭南山少帅Felix𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭 to ᡃ⃝𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭南山少帅Feᷠ᪻ᷠ᪻᪻ᷠ᪻᪻᪻ᷠ᪻᪻᪻᪻ᷠ᪻᪻᪻ᷠ᪻᪻ᷠ᪻lix𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭𑲭. | 23:38:25 |