!MNkZeDktHEshWITStt:matrix.org

OpenLMIS-Help

69 Members
32 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
15 Sep 2020
@_slack_openlmis_U011A2HETHN:matrix.orgAdrian Świszcz changed their profile picture.08:41:50
@_slack_openlmis_U01AM5RQG90:matrix.orgJimesh Shah sbrudzinski http://172.16.7.101/test I am getting success responses for all other APIs but this API(/test) was added by me for testing purpose. 08:48:08
@_slack_openlmis_U195RKK4G:matrix.orgsbrudzinski May I ask what's the URL of your development environment (the one you said it's not working) Jimesh Shah? 08:49:36
@_slack_openlmis_U195RKK4G:matrix.orgsbrudzinski (edited) ... not working)? => ... not working) Jimesh Shah? 08:49:41
@_slack_openlmis_UB9E8UV89:matrix.orgJoannaS
In reply to@_slack_openlmis_U03QATSPZ:matrix.org
Could someone confirm that bug or have any insight?
This issue is still unsolved. You have correctly noticed that specifying the date in the program does not result in limiting the number of periods for the facility. For now, the case was described in https://openlmis.atlassian.net/browse/OLMIS-3702, and left in the Roadmap.
08:50:18
@_slack_openlmis_U03QATSPZ:matrix.orgjoshzamor
In reply to@_slack_openlmis_UB9E8UV89:matrix.org
This issue is still unsolved. You have correctly noticed that specifying the date in the program does not result in limiting the number of periods for the facility. For now, the case was described in https://openlmis.atlassian.net/browse/OLMIS-3702, and left in the Roadmap.
Thanks JoannaS!
14:01:50
@_slack_openlmis_U03QATSPZ:matrix.orgjoshzamor
In reply to@_slack_openlmis_U195RKK4G:matrix.org
joshzamor at facility program start date - this was proposed nearly 3 years ago, but the response has been that there is some complexity involved and the impact is unknown. So the current state is that this was never approved to be implemented - https://openlmis.atlassian.net/browse/OLMIS-3702 although this would help implementations a lot (Malawi needs to skip ~100 requisition periods for each program whenever a new facility is added)
­čś▒
14:02:58
@_slack_openlmis_U03QATSPZ:matrix.orgjoshzamor
In reply to@_slack_openlmis_U03QATSPZ:matrix.org
­čś▒
Thanks sbrudzinski.
14:03:16
@_slack_openlmis_U03QATSPZ:matrix.orgjoshzamor
In reply to@_slack_openlmis_U03QATSPZ:matrix.org
Thanks sbrudzinski.
I don't remember that old issue at all, great to have the history.
14:03:38
@_slack_openlmis_U03QATSPZ:matrix.orgjoshzamor
In reply to@_slack_openlmis_U03QATSPZ:matrix.org
I don't remember that old issue at all, great to have the history.
If I read that issue right, the way forward is for someone to jump into the complexity and figure out what might be effected if we fix the bug, right?
14:05:04
@_slack_openlmis_U195RKK4G:matrix.orgsbrudzinski
In reply to@_slack_openlmis_U03QATSPZ:matrix.org
If I read that issue right, the way forward is for someone to jump into the complexity and figure out what might be effected if we fix the bug, right?
I guess, although I guess we looked into it two times already, and figured that only some reports might be using it for now
14:19:17
@_slack_openlmis_U195RKK4G:matrix.orgsbrudzinski
In reply to@_slack_openlmis_U195RKK4G:matrix.org
I guess, although I guess we looked into it two times already, and figured that only some reports might be using it for now
so it doesn't seem like there are any other dependencies or complications with this
14:19:52
@_slack_openlmis_U195RKK4G:matrix.orgsbrudzinski
In reply to@_slack_openlmis_U195RKK4G:matrix.org
so it doesn't seem like there are any other dependencies or complications with this
seems like a very straightforward feature
14:20:11
@_slack_openlmis_U03QATSPZ:matrix.orgjoshzamor OpenLMIS and Demo data: do we need processing periods that go back to 2017 in the monthly schedule? Would it be a big deal to change to a more recent date (esp given aforementioned bug)? 14:21:20
@_slack_openlmis_U03QATSPZ:matrix.orgjoshzamor
In reply to@_slack_openlmis_U195RKK4G:matrix.org
seems like a very straightforward feature
Great. Does the team have a current practice for suggesting bumping an issues priority for consideration in the next grooming call? I so often have a conflict that I can't make it.
14:22:32
@_slack_openlmis_U195RKK4G:matrix.orgsbrudzinski
In reply to@_slack_openlmis_U03QATSPZ:matrix.org
Great. Does the team have a current practice for suggesting bumping an issues priority for consideration in the next grooming call? I so often have a conflict that I can't make it.
Yes, we could do that. Is it time sensitive? Because we are pretty much approaching code freeze (last sprint before regression starts)
14:28:20
@_slack_openlmis_U195RKK4G:matrix.orgsbrudzinski Some test cases might need to be updated, as well as automated functional/contract tests with this change 14:29:08
@_slack_openlmis_U03QATSPZ:matrix.orgjoshzamor
In reply to@_slack_openlmis_U195RKK4G:matrix.org
Yes, we could do that. Is it time sensitive? Because we are pretty much approaching code freeze (last sprint before regression starts)
Not that sensitive I don't think. It'd help me to have it down now of course, but that's not even a question. I'd put it in the mix for upcoming backlog grooming's though.
21:26:45
16 Sep 2020
@_slack_openlmis_U195RKK4G:matrix.orgsbrudzinski
In reply to@_slack_openlmis_U03QATSPZ:matrix.org
Not that sensitive I don't think. It'd help me to have it down now of course, but that's not even a question. I'd put it in the mix for upcoming backlog grooming's though.
Okies, in that case I can bring it up after the release
07:54:43
17 Sep 2020
@lita:synod.im@lita:synod.im left the room.00:20:19
22 Sep 2020
@_slack_openlmis_U011A2HETHN:matrix.orgAdrian Świszcz
In reply to@_slack_openlmis_U03QATSPZ:matrix.org
Also Technical Committee: we have a scheduled call this Wednesday (16th), and I have a conflict. What do people think about pushing back to the next week, and holding it on Tuesday (22nd)?
Hi joshzamor, Could you send me an invitation for today's tech committee meeting?
05:32:36
@_slack_openlmis_U03QATSPZ:matrix.orgjoshzamor
In reply to@_slack_openlmis_U011A2HETHN:matrix.org
Hi joshzamor, Could you send me an invitation for today's tech committee meeting?
You should have it now Adrian Świszcz.
05:46:12
@_slack_openlmis_U011A2HETHN:matrix.orgAdrian Świszcz
In reply to@_slack_openlmis_U03QATSPZ:matrix.org
You should have it now Adrian Świszcz.
Thank you!
05:46:59
24 Sep 2020
@_slack_openlmis_U017Q6UN4R2:matrix.orgSneha Gohel hi @room do we have mobile app? 05:20:27
@_slack_openlmis_U1GKV2T18:matrix.orgkpalkowska
In reply to@_slack_openlmis_U017Q6UN4R2:matrix.org
hi @room do we have mobile app?
Unfortunately, no.
06:39:06
@_slack_openlmis_U017Q6UN4R2:matrix.orgSneha Gohel
In reply to@_slack_openlmis_U1GKV2T18:matrix.org
Unfortunately, no.
oh ok
06:54:04
@_slack_openlmis_U01BP6799CZ:matrix.orgDamian Kryger joined the room.09:00:48
@_slack_openlmis_U01BP6799CZ:matrix.orgDamian Kryger changed their display name from _slack_openlmis_U01BP6799CZ to Damian Kryger.09:27:41
@_slack_openlmis_UBB6KN8JJ:matrix.orgWes
In reply to@_slack_openlmis_U017Q6UN4R2:matrix.org
oh ok
Sneha Gohel There are some mobile solutions that do leverage OpenLMIS, OpenSRP being the primary one (depending on your needs)
14:53:39
@_slack_openlmis_UBB6KN8JJ:matrix.orgWes
In reply to@_slack_openlmis_UBB6KN8JJ:matrix.org
Sneha Gohel There are some mobile solutions that do leverage OpenLMIS, OpenSRP being the primary one (depending on your needs)
However, it is something that we would LOVE to have the time/funding to be able to build
14:53:52

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room List