!MNcKSFvcUTluxSJYVd:matrix.org

Kabocha Technical Chat

421 Members
Support for engineering, maintenance, pallets, nodes, runtimes, RPCs, APIs and building on Kabocha.5 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
30 Aug 2022
@_discord_480348633632604160:t2bot.iorichdecentpartners Will share it here soon 07:11:17
@_discord_480348633632604160:t2bot.iorichdecentpartners Did you leave this comment on the actual post? 07:13:09
@_discord_480348633632604160:t2bot.iorichdecentpartners Further to my note in Edgeware proposals channel we (EDG/KAB) contributors need to become active in the KSM forums - not brigading or mindlessly supporting posts, but engaging and sharing lived experience, objective reasoning and enthusiasm 07:15:03
@_discord_480348633632604160:t2bot.iorichdecentpartners https://discord.com/channels/537281916567814144/747673085108551701/1013892808081420398 07:17:39
@_discord_412648781109002260:t2bot.ioRamsey | Kabocha Tech Steward Indeed, well done for starting that ball rolling, very inspirational. I will engage in your post.

We can be leading by example engaging in wider forums, with a meta-tribalist/universalist, outward looking, multi-chain essentialist approach. We can also be engaging in Polkadot forum, as it’s different values experiments of pretty much the same community, just with different techno-political values if you will. Where Polkadot has the commercial conservative approach and Kusama on the cutting edge and creative wand of possibilities, less risk-averse. (Therefore governance overrides more acceptable, less blockchain dogmatic.)

Some non-exhaustive key categories and questions:
- Influencing Kusama strategy narrative.
- XCM Product curation with XCM design and development.
- New relay, principled design

Wider question we have been and can continue to explore is, where is blockchain heading and how to create truly sovereign reality?

Every parachain of Kusama is a key member of Kusama. Therefore we can be engaging inspiring, exploring, discussing in that forum. We need MEPs (Nigel Farage, Nick Clegg). You’re the Nick Clegg of Kabocha, lol.
08:03:54
@_discord_480348633632604160:t2bot.iorichdecentpartners I’m not sure the Nick Clegg of Kabocha is what I had in mind… 😉 08:17:30
@_discord_480348633632604160:t2bot.iorichdecentpartners Let’s move to #direction as you suggested 08:17:49
@_discord_412648781109002260:t2bot.ioRamsey | Kabocha Tech Steward ——-

Update kab-releasev0.2.2
Kabocha currently has both sudo and democracy functions, meaning the sudo account can make runtime upgrades, but there can now be referendums, which can begin at any time.

The sudo phase of Kabocha is nearing the end, just a few more fast iterations and runtime upgrades before it gets killed 🔫. But thereafter we could consider an interim technical collective that could fasttrack runtime upgrades. Yes the normal referendums are fast, but still technical collective can be super fast like a matter of hours/days instead of days/weeks. Within this phase the first Kabocha proposals and referendums can begin.

MVP Gov**
I know d.gen rich - decent partners have been planning governance system, and having something totally separate from CW/EDG, (same as KSM/DOT), is cleaner given the different techno-political values, perhaps it will be a blocker to wait for that platform before we begin? Therefore we can have a super manual minimal viable proposal system. And what I would suggest is minting finalised Proposal pdf on https://singular.RMRK.app, and using that hash in the on-chain proposal. At least then we’ve solved timestamp issue. The minting functionality requires a some metadata and that can be the hash or link to the pdf nft
08:42:42
@_discord_412648781109002260:t2bot.ioRamsey | Kabocha Tech Steward * ——-

Update kab-releasev0.2.2
Kabocha currently has both sudo and democracy functions, meaning the sudo account can make runtime upgrades, but there can now be referendums, which can begin at any time.

The sudo phase of Kabocha is nearing the end, just a few more fast iterations and runtime upgrades before it gets killed 🔫. But thereafter we could consider an interim technical collective that could fasttrack runtime upgrades. Yes the normal referendums are fast, but still technical collective can be super fast like a matter of hours/days instead of days/weeks. Within this phase the first Kabocha proposals and referendums can begin.

MVP Gov
I know d.gen rich - decent partners have been planning governance system, and having something totally separate from CW/EDG, (same as KSM/DOT), is cleaner given the different techno-political values, perhaps it will be a blocker to wait for that platform before we begin? Therefore we can have a super manual minimal viable proposal system. And what I would suggest is minting finalised Proposal pdf on https://singular.RMRK.app, and using that hash in the on-chain proposal. At least then we’ve solved timestamp issue. The minting functionality requires a some metadata and that can be the hash or link to the pdf nft
08:42:44
@_discord_480348633632604160:t2bot.iorichdecentpartners I think short term solution is Subsquare - we can export / move / fork from there 08:50:07
@_discord_480348633632604160:t2bot.iorichdecentpartners Saves extra work 08:50:20
@_discord_480348633632604160:t2bot.iorichdecentpartners And also we may involve them in development of the new gov system anyways 08:50:36
@_discord_480348633632604160:t2bot.iorichdecentpartners Better to bring together aligned group 08:50:50
@_discord_480348633632604160:t2bot.iorichdecentpartners And hack off pieces 08:50:58
@_discord_480348633632604160:t2bot.iorichdecentpartners Each 08:51:00
@_discord_480348633632604160:t2bot.iorichdecentpartners The RMRK idea is good tho 08:51:14
@_discord_480348633632604160:t2bot.iorichdecentpartners And yes, a nice MVP 08:51:22
@_discord_412648781109002260:t2bot.ioRamsey | Kabocha Tech Steward Subsquare sounds great, if we can leverage that interface, if it’s ready right now let’s all sign up there now, if not we can do the MVP until it’s usable. I 08:54:39
@_discord_412648781109002260:t2bot.ioRamsey | Kabocha Tech Steward * Subsquare sounds great, if we can leverage that interface, if it’s ready right now let’s all sign up there now, if not we can do the MVP until it’s usable. 08:54:52
@_discord_412648781109002260:t2bot.ioRamsey | Kabocha Tech Steward * Subsquare sounds great, if we can leverage that interface and if it’s ready right now let’s all sign up there, if not we can do the MVP until it’s usable. 08:56:23
@_discord_839632068875255809:t2bot.iod.gen This is Plume 👀 12:53:44
@_discord_839632068875255809:t2bot.iod.gen Ramsey (Decentration) OOO I’m indeed working on a composable text nft tech based on RMRK, called Plume, which would power a large range of publications platforms/parachains/dapps. Plume would be sufficient on statemine (or statemint) like RMRK is. Could be defined as RMRK’s cousin 12:56:59
@_discord_839632068875255809:t2bot.iod.gen It’s a primitive for on chain proposals, social medias, publications platforms, messaging platforms etc 12:58:58
@_discord_480348633632604160:t2bot.iorichdecentpartners
we can have a super manual minimal viable proposal system. And what I would suggest is minting finalised Proposal pdf on https://singular.rmrk.app/, and using that hash in the on-chain proposal. At least then we’ve solved timestamp issue. The minting functionality requires a some metadata and that can be the hash or link to the pdf nft
12:59:55
@_discord_480348633632604160:t2bot.iorichdecentpartners just invited justin, related to the discussions around version control 13:00:22
@_discord_480348633632604160:t2bot.iorichdecentpartners https://hackmd.io/eQCQuqAOQsyqbWc5QSm1Ew?view 13:00:43
@_discord_412648781109002260:t2bot.ioRamsey | Kabocha Tech Steward Sounds like really cool and useful focus 14:06:50
@_discord_412648781109002260:t2bot.ioRamsey | Kabocha Tech Steward Great start to a proposal pallet. Justin we can test on Kabocha soupcan testnet, on our persisting Pop-Art relay chain test net. And it would be pretty frictionless to include it in Kabocha mainnet upgrade when it is production ready.

Suggestion: perhaps for storage efficiency add pub fn delete() to kill() storage, only for unfunded proposals, or archived proposals after a time frame.
14:23:12
@_discord_480348633632604160:t2bot.iorichdecentpartners Jfrevert 15:27:54
@_discord_480348633632604160:t2bot.iorichdecentpartners Can you post now? 15:28:00

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6