| 26 May 2022 |
 WorldSEnder#8649 | where'd you get that from, multi-line string literals work like they do in rust | 22:55:31 |
 Darkuss#3803 | sorry, i come from html | 22:58:25 |
| WorldSEnder#8649 | yeah, there are slight differences between html and html! to bridge the difference to rust 😄 | 22:59:02 |
| Darkuss#3803 | ok so the next problem i'm facing is that it seems that { var } sanitizes the variable content and displays content as is, is there a way to turn that off so html tags in the variable are rendered? | 23:02:56 |
| WorldSEnder#8649 | that's by design to protect against xss | 23:04:30 |
| WorldSEnder#8649 | and no, there's no magic __innerHtml, you'll have to parse it yourself, or follow the inner_html example https://github.com/yewstack/yew/tree/master/examples/inner_html | 23:05:27 |
| Darkuss#3803 | well that seems a little bit inconvenient | 23:06:46 |
 Innominus#5664 | What's the overhead cost of spinning up an agent? | 23:08:47 |
| WorldSEnder#8649 | script injection is a bit more than a little bit inconvenient | 23:10:27 |
| Darkuss#3803 | sure, but i definitely can imagine a scenario where someone would want to use that | 23:11:47 |
| Darkuss#3803 | maybe lock it behind a crate feature | 23:11:57 |
| WorldSEnder#8649 | if you want it, the workaround is in the example. But it's a extremely large footgun overall | 23:14:51 |
 aftix | I'm stuck with this testing thing, any ideas how to make my component call a mock function instead of trying to reach my API when i'm running tests? | 23:23:55 |
| aftix | I tried to make a Box<dyn ApiCaller> but async_trait wouldn't behave the same as top-level async fn and that isn't something I can use prop_or with | 23:24:42 |
| aftix | I can think of using mock: bool in the props and deciding in the component but that's ugly and couples test to the component | 23:25:49 |
| WorldSEnder#8649 | without detailed design, you could #[cfg(test)] some top-level function that actually makes the request and switch to a mock version | 23:25:59 |
| aftix | That would only allow me to return 1 thing from the mock function, but what if i need tests that mock different API responses? | 23:28:30 |
| WorldSEnder#8649 | true, though perhaps you can pass stuff through a ContextProvider | 23:29:40 |
| WorldSEnder#8649 | anyway, sleep calls again for me 😉 | 23:29:47 |
| aftix | that would work! My API calls need the context anyways usually | 23:29:56 |
| 27 May 2022 |
| Innominus#5664 | How does use_effect_with_deps actually run | 00:33:13 |
| Innominus#5664 | does it not run on the first render? | 00:33:18 |
| Innominus#5664 | How do I make it do that? It seems to only run on the second render when something changes | 00:33:29 |
| Innominus#5664 | ah, I see | 00:43:44 |
| Innominus#5664 | sort of lel | 01:01:52 |
| Innominus#5664 | would it be bad practice to use use_effect and move in a boolean that will dictate whether to run use_effect or not? | 01:31:43 |
| Innominus#5664 | Actually that sounds even more pointless. Doesn't everything in the function get re-run every render? I could just omit use_effect anyway | 01:32:37 |
 jetli | there's a hook use_mount from yew-hooks which does this job, it only executes callback when a component is first mount, example: https://github.com/jetli/yew-hooks/blob/main/examples/yew-app/src/routes/hooks/use_mount.rs
or you can simply use use_effect_with_deps which depends on () like this:
use_effect_with_deps(move |_| {
// do something
|| ()
}, ());
| 02:49:37 |
| Innominus#5664 | Interesting, use effect with deps wasn't working for me when I first tried | 02:49:50 |
| Innominus#5664 | I wasn't using a blank '()' as the dependent though. Cheers | 02:50:11 |
