| 19 Feb 2019 |
| 18:45:53 |  heyarne | oh, another reason why migration to gitlab might be super neat: the continuous integration provided by the platform allows you to host static pages that are way more complex than those on github, which are essentially either jekyll-based or static files |
| 18:46:23 | heyarne | so we could have the docs generated there directly :) in addition to tests being run etc pp |
| 18:46:59 | heyarne | and you could always move to your own server if gitlab-the-company decides to do weird stuff |
| 19:23:21 |  drtsct | fuck, lost my playlists. |
| 19:24:20 | heyarne | oh... fwiw, restoring a backup and restarting the service work be just fine |
| 19:24:38 | heyarne | eh, not "work be". "should work" |
| 21:36:12 | |  @freenode_sbrubes:matrix.org joined the room. |
| 20 Feb 2019 |
| 00:30:56 |  joola | heyarne: We could start working on this together ? what do you think ? |
| 00:38:25 | joola | I learned how the whole gitlab system works this past year, so we could start doing this without being totally blind. |
| 02:31:03 | | @freenode_sbrubes:matrix.org left the room. |
| 04:30:04 | |  @freenode_ice-9:matrix.org joined the room. |
| 04:30:08 | @freenode_ice-9:matrix.org | hey yall |
| 04:31:18 | @freenode_ice-9:matrix.org | Anyone having any issues compiling 10.2.1 I'm trying to build the war and it's failing under the test section, |
| 04:31:56 | @freenode_ice-9:matrix.org | [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.22.0:test (default-test) on project airsonic-main: There are test failures. |
| 04:41:51 | @freenode_ice-9:matrix.org | nevermind stupid me, i fixed it |
| 04:41:55 | | @freenode_ice-9:matrix.org left the room. |
| 04:47:40 | | @freenode_sbrubes:matrix.org joined the room. |
| 05:35:45 | | @freenode_sbrubes:matrix.org left the room. |
| 05:46:46 | | @freenode_ice-9:matrix.org joined the room. |
| 06:30:48 | | @freenode_ice-9:matrix.org left the room. |
| 07:14:04 | heyarne | In reply to @joola:matrix.org
heyarne: We could start working on this together ? what do you think ? sounds good. what would the migration strategy be? leave all the old repositories on github and mark them as deprecated? maybe we should move the docs first, see if it works for us? |
| 07:15:00 | heyarne | i have also used gitlab in the past already, along with ci and everything, so it shouldn't cause too many hiccups i think |
| 07:16:49 |  jlanda | gitlab ci syntax is great imho |
| 07:16:53 | jlanda | and easy to learn ;) |
| 07:31:03 | |  arubislander joined the room. |
| 12:46:19 | joola | I would start documenting the migration in a ticket. Split every step into small ones, with some priorities.
Also need to think whether and how we want to move all the issues and PR's (I guess this is only important for the main repo). |
| 16:32:16 | joola | Haha I guess github is so feature less that gitlab already intergate a migration tool that move the issues and PR seamslessly |
| 21 Feb 2019 |
| 01:48:22 | |  okjl joined the room. |
| 01:52:59 | | okjl left the room. |
| 02:07:56 | | okjl joined the room. |
