Question: why can ant entity not mint the second token?

I understant that I can encode special conditions to be evaluated with the
parameters of my function call by tight-packing them into uint256 arrays. Very
neat.

What I dont understand, is how this is done in some examples, e.g. the Voting.sol, or Vault.sol

what does these lines mean:

    authP(TRANSFER_ROLE, arr(_token, _to, _value))

what are the contraints that _token , _ and _value have to fulfill?

(by reading the documentation I found that there is grantPermissionP() which
allows to specify some parameters processing, but I dont see it invoked in relation to the TOKEN_TRANSFER role.)

thanks!

I understant that I can encode special conditions to be evaluated with the
parameters of my function call by tight-packing them into uint256 arrays. Very
neat.

What I dont understand, is how this is done in some examples, e.g. the Voting.sol, or Vault.sol

what does these lines mean:

    authP(TRANSFER_ROLE, arr(_token, _to, _value))

what are the contraints that _token , _ and _value have to fulfill?

(by reading the documentation I found that there is grantPermissionP() which
allows to specify some parameters processing, but I dont see it invoked in relation to the TOKEN_TRANSFER role.)

thanks!

I definitely hope to work with it in the future… Your evmscript forwarding is really slick to. Modularity that makes me smile :)

So I dont understand what I need to to to be able to execute evm_scripts

I understand the IForwarderInterface, where I would call runScript(scryptAsBytes), given for example
that I certain conditions I can specify with canForward() are satisfied.

On first look, Vote.sol can execute a forwarded script via runScript()

My question now is related to where that call goes then.

Is my understanding correct, that any contract inheriting from AragonApp.sol can
execute scripts via runScript()?

What is confusing me is the section about the EVMScriptRegistry and the IEMVSCriptExecutor Interface.
It says that any contract I want to execute such callscripts needs to implement the IEVMScriptExecutor-interface.

But when I generated an this diagram from the code, and there it seems that aragon app does not inherit from IEVMScriptExecutor…

Can you tell what I am missing?

So I dont understand what I need to to to be able to execute evm_scripts

I understand the IForwarderInterface, where I would call runScript(scryptAsBytes), given for example
that I certain conditions I can specify with canForward() are satisfied.

On first look, Vote.sol can execute a forwarded script via runScript()

My question now is related to where that call goes then.

Is my understanding correct, that any contract inheriting from AragonApp.sol can
execute scripts via runScript()?

What is confusing me is the section about the EVMScriptRegistry and the IEMVSCriptExecutor Interface. (https://hack.aragon.org/docs/aragonos-3-ref#evmscripts)
It says that any contract I want to execute such callscripts needs to implement the IEVMScriptExecutor-interface.

But when I generated an this diagram from the code, and there it seems that aragon app does not inherit from IEVMScriptExecutor…

Can you tell what I am missing?