| 8 Aug 2024 |
|  @incognition-index:matrix.org joined the room. | 09:23:07 |
|  @sdrk:matrix.org joined the room. | 10:34:52 |
| @incognition-index:matrix.org left the room. | 11:24:35 |
| @sdrk:matrix.org left the room. | 11:31:05 |
| 9 Aug 2024 |
|  tom changed their display name from tom to tom [away]. | 10:10:05 |
|  @samspudd:matrix.lukeog.com joined the room. | 20:18:45 |
| tom changed their display name from tom [away] to tom [away ยท back 2024-08-19]. | 21:53:13 |
| @samspudd:matrix.lukeog.com left the room. | 22:32:45 |
| 10 Aug 2024 |
 anton | In reply to @nex:nexy7574.co.uk
https://gitlab.matrix.org/matrix-org/olm/-/blob/master/README.md?ref_type=heads#important-libolm-is-now-deprecated
Does the libolm deprecation affect matrix-nio? The only python bindings for vodozemac I could find are at https://github.com/matrix-org/vodozemac-bindings and they are... 2 years old? I'm not sure how we can migrate, tbh. | 16:26:10 |
 dkasak | There weren't that many changes in vodozemac, that's why there weren't many updates. The bindings were still functional when I tried them about half a year ago. | 16:37:27 |
| dkasak | Though admittedly, the bindings could use some love but we'd much appreciate contributions for this | 16:43:05 |
| anton | I can compile them -- but they seem to pin the version of vodozemac to an old commit. There a few mentions of "bugfixes" and "security fixes" in the release notes for the intervening versions, though nothing looks super scary on the surface. | 16:45:01 |
| anton | In reply to @dkasak:termina.org.uk
Though admittedly, the bindings could use some love but we'd much appreciate contributions for this I am actually looking at the c++ bindings at the moment, but I come from not knowing rust at all. Could end up being a nice intro into the language for me -- or a complete failure :)
By any chance, is there an appropriate room for me to join, if I need help with this?
| 16:49:26 |
