| 16 Jan 2019 |
|  dOrgJellichanged room power levels. | 22:52:43 |
| dOrgJellichanged room power levels. | 22:52:49 |
| dOrgJellichanged room power levels. | 22:52:53 |
| dOrgJelli | This channel's purpose? Trash on the tools we're actively developing! 😀 I'm serious too. Go on, it's fun, here look:
Why t'f' is it asking me to make a token... I just wanted a DAO... | 22:54:53 |
| dOrgJelli | https://dorg.tech/ 🤦 | 22:55:41 |
|  cd10012 joined the room. | 23:19:08 |
|  orishim joined the room. | 23:21:30 |
| orishim | Why tf didn't you tell me I had to be on Kovan!? | 23:22:57 |
| orishim | (Add Founders)
Am I minting these tokens out of thin air!?
Are these erc20’s?
What is reputation?
(Select Features)
What’s the difference between “Feature Registrar” and “Global Constraint Registrar” vs. “Upgrade”? Don’t they both imply the ability to change initial conditions??
It would be great to have a visual (mockup of the future UI component for it…?) of each feature pop-up when I miss over it. Also a link to the GitHub code where the scheme is implemented.
Why would DAO to DAO Voting ever not be a thing? Is this actually its own scheme? Can’t every DAO invoke any function call on any deployed smart contract?
ICO and Token Vesting shouldn’t be on/off switch, they should be their own skippable pages since that sort of thing would come with a lot more parameters.
“Organization Register”- what is a registry…….? | 23:34:09 |
| orishim | {these are all rhetorical questions that I imagine a user having} | 23:34:36 |
| dOrgJelli | Yessss moar moar moar!!! 😈😂 | 23:35:28 |
| orishim | and some that are legitimately confusing me | 23:35:29 |
| orishim | (Configure Voting)
[ Absolute Vote: ]
“Proposer Voting” field should be boolean, not text
“Majority Percentage” should be a slider from 0-100
[Genesis Protocol]
The default view should be a TL DR of the implications of the default parameters with an “Advanced” button that allows user to go in and fine tune each one.
The default view should show the big things like:
-boosted proposal voting period
-regular proposal voting period (in days, not seconds)
and maybe a few more like rep penalties and rewards and token rewards
I think we should strive to follow this pattern in general: TL DR: for default, “Advanced” option for superusers. | 23:46:51 |
| 17 Jan 2019 |
|  ontologymachine joined the room. | 00:16:18 |
| ontologymachine | yesss love this | 00:16:31 |
|  Asgeir joined the room. | 03:58:21 |
| Asgeir | 😍🙌😄 | 04:04:36 |
| Asgeir | This all looks great. We shuld add this stuff as GitHub issues | 04:06:25 |
| Asgeir | Maybe create a UX proposal? | 04:08:35 |
| dOrgJelli | That sounds like a great idea @Asgeir! | 05:32:25 |
| 18 Jan 2019 |
| dOrgJelli set the room topic to "Chats: https://riot.im/app/#/group/+dorgtech:matrix.org". | 01:36:28 |
| 19 Jan 2019 |
| orishim | Being able to flip through the pages without necessarily filling out the info would be nice | 00:39:55 |
| ontologymachine | agreed this is a big one - let’s be sure to include a survey question testing if users agree 💫 | 00:42:30 |
| dOrgJelli | I can try to add this. It’d be nice to have this feedback in Stack Ranked order | 00:45:37 |
| ontologymachine | can you elaborate on what that would involve? we want to ensure the feedback translates as directly to explicit action items for y’all as possible | 00:47:25 |
| dOrgJelli | It means we make tasks for each, and the tasks get completed in order of highest rated | 00:49:01 |
| orishim | Where would that happen? Github issues? | 00:49:13 |
| dOrgJelli | Yeet | 00:51:58 |
| ontologymachine | 👌👌👌 | 00:52:35 |
| orishim | Sorry but I'm going to keep dumping my thoughts here and turn into issues later | 01:08:07 |
