| 27 Feb 2020 |
|  TwilCynder changed their display name from TwilCynder to TwilCynder#9617. | 19:23:09 |
| TwilCynder changed their display name from TwilCynder#9617 to TwilCynder. | 19:23:10 |
 eaterjolly | I definitely trust they have the community necessary to finish the project.
In the end, the more unsavory (or political) design aspects would require game theory as well as a figurative scalpel, to fix.
I'd prefer folks behind gnunet, secushare, netsukuku or generally closer to the fsf or GNU create a fork, prior to any FLOSS community popularity. | 23:36:07 |
| eaterjolly | * I definitely trust they have the community necessary to finish the project.
In the end, the more unsavory (or political) design aspects would require game theory as well as a figurative scalpel, to fix.</br>
I'd prefer folks behind gnunet, secushare, netsukuku or generally closer to the fsf or GNU create a fork, prior to any FLOSS community popularity. | 23:36:16 |
| eaterjolly | * I definitely trust they have the community necessary to finish the project.
In the end, the more unsavory (or political) design aspects would require game theory as well as a figurative scalpel, to fix.
I'd prefer folks behind gnunet, secushare, netsukuku or generally closer to the fsf or GNU create a fork, prior to any FLOSS community popularity. | 23:36:23 |
| eaterjolly | * I definitely trust they have the people necessary to finish the project.
In the end, the more unsavory (or political) design aspects would require game theory as well as a figurative scalpel, to fix.
I'd prefer folks behind gnunet, secushare, netsukuku or generally closer to the fsf or GNU create a fork, prior to any FLOSS community popularity. | 23:36:48 |
| eaterjolly | * I definitely trust they have the people necessary to finish the project.
In the end, the more unsavory (or political) design aspects would require game theory as well as a figurative scalpel, to fix.
I'd prefer folks behind gnunet, secushare, netsukuku or generally closer to GNU create a fork, prior to any FLOSS community popularity. | 23:37:29 |
| eaterjolly | * I definitely trust they have the community to carry out the project.
In the end, the more unsavory (or political) design aspects would require game theory as well as a figurative scalpel, to fix.
I'd prefer folks behind gnunet, secushare, netsukuku or generally closer to GNU create a fork, prior to any FLOSS community popularity. | 23:40:02 |
 Cluedrew | What do you consider to be the more unsavory (or political) design aspects? | 23:39:08 |
| eaterjolly | * I definitely trust they have the community to carry out the project.
In the end, the more unsavory (or political) design aspects would require game theory as well as a figurative scalpel, to fix.
I'd prefer folks behind gnunet, secushare, netsukuku or generally closer to GNU create a fork, before major FLOSS popularity. | 23:40:52 |
| eaterjolly | Imagine if some of those so-called hacktivists in anonymous or cicada pooled their talent to design some open hardware, using game theory or behavior economics to design a system for a peer-to-peer internet.
Then integrate that network stack into an OS kernel, like urbit does. | 23:48:32 |
| Cluedrew | Also your message showed up about 6 times? | 23:43:43 |
| 28 Feb 2020 |
| eaterjolly | * Imagine if some of those so-called hacktivists in anonymous or cicada pooled their talent to design some open hardware, using game theory or behavior economics to design a system for a peer-to-peer internet.
</br>
Then integrate that network stack into an OS kernel, like urbit does. | 02:46:21 |
| 27 Feb 2020 |
| Cluedrew | That might be an issue with the bridge. | 23:44:13 |
| 28 Feb 2020 |
| eaterjolly | * Imagine if some of those so-called hacktivists in anonymous or cicada pooled their talent to design some open hardware, using game theory or behavior economics to design a system for a peer-to-peer internet.
Then integrate that network stack into an OS kernel, like urbit does. | 02:46:27 |
| Cluedrew | Was that the answer? I thought it was just set up. I might be missing something. | 00:05:14 |
| eaterjolly | * Imagine if some of those so-called hacktivists in anonymous or cicada pooled their talent to design some open hardware, using game theory or behavior economics to design a system for a peer-to-peer internet.
Then integrate that network stack into an OS kernel, like urbit does. | 02:46:31 |
|  Saikyo changed their display name from Saikyo to Saikyo#0173. | 01:27:16 |
 Alex | It's because he edited it. It looks like one edited post here but each edit is a separate post across the bridge | 06:29:47 |
| Saikyo changed their display name from Saikyo#0173 to Saikyo. | 01:27:18 |
| eaterjolly | I kept that intentionally vague.
If you want to care about that aspect,
then you need to form your own opinion ; p | 18:34:43 |
| TwilCynder changed their display name from TwilCynder to TwilCynder#5454. | 08:28:30 |
| TwilCynder changed their display name from TwilCynder#5454 to TwilCynder. | 08:28:31 |
| Cluedrew | Don't worry, I will form my own opinion wheither or not you tell me yours. I do still like to hear different perspectives on things. | 23:35:15 |
| Cluedrew | By the way I have not been able to get better than an overwhelmingly negative responce on Hoon. In hindsight maybe I should of started with Urbit itself or Nork as that might of been a better presentation the entire project.
Ultimitately I think the problem, "Quite convoluted from the standpoint of someone already invested in pre-existing programming conventions", means its quite convoluted from the standpoint of all programmers not in this project already. Which makes it very hard to approach.
Now Urbit from a user's perspective could still be approachable, but you have lost a lot of the advantages of it being open source if the source is in a language no one wants to touch. And its not no one, but I do think it is less people than if the language was approachable. And functional is already quite a step for many people. | 23:45:22 |
| Cluedrew | Alex Gleason: Thanks for the explination. | 23:45:48 |
| 29 Feb 2020 |
|  @_discord_422359595457970176:t2bot.io changed their display name from Boterham to Boterham#0001. | 01:22:27 |
| @_discord_422359595457970176:t2bot.io changed their display name from Boterham#0001 to Boterham. | 01:22:28 |
| Saikyo changed their display name from Saikyo to Saikyo#0173. | 01:51:58 |
| Saikyo changed their display name from Saikyo#0173 to Saikyo. | 01:52:05 |
