| 19 Jul 2024 |
 j0hnny | In reply to @ifiguero:matrix.org
Also it is somewhat of a common practice to keep the host os on a different medium than the data (guests). Some even comes with some redundant flash storage. But flash can fail if the hypervisor gets updated often Yes, thats I know from other (not vm based) concepts. So it would be better to separate host & guest. | 19:21:58 |
| j0hnny | Flash is always a bad idea | 19:22:16 |
| j0hnny | In reply to @ifiguero:matrix.org
Without knowing your workload. Disk could be a bottleneck or it might not. Sometimes the workload is heavy on ram, sometimes is heavy on IO Yeah, i will check it out. Its a good point. | 19:23:01 |
| j0hnny | If I have a license for win server 19 standard, I have also automatically 2 licenses for same kind of VMs, isnt it? But can I install it on another machine? So 1 win server natively on one bare metal and the VMs on another bare metal with proxmox? Or is it just possible to install 2 win server VMs within the win server itself via hyper-v? | 19:29:30 |
 ifiguero | You can run as many windows servers VMs as you want. Licencewise I have no idea what is the current model. I know there is some windows server datacenter that allows unlimited guest I guess. But I don't know how the standard works | 19:33:45 |
 d3nt0n | Just use these: https://github.com/massgravel/Microsoft-Activation-Scripts | 19:35:17 |
| j0hnny | But as I understand it doesnt answer the question, if its allowed to install the two VMs within windows server license on another bare metal. | 19:39:36 |
| d3nt0n | I believe the vm license only applies to another windows 19 vm running under hyper v. you can't transfer that to another machine | 20:53:42 |
| j0hnny | In reply to @d3nt0n:matrix.org
I believe the vm license only applies to another windows 19 vm running under hyper v. you can't transfer that to another machine I also suppose that, but is there any official info about such topic I can find? | 21:12:21 |
|  screen joined the room. | 21:53:39 |
| 20 Jul 2024 |
|  Kezkch joined the room. | 13:39:50 |
|  Cruthachail left the room. | 14:06:26 |
| 21 Jul 2024 |
|  sushil pun joined the room. | 15:49:57 |
|  katin set a profile picture. | 18:31:51 |
| katin changed their profile picture. | 18:32:20 |
| katin changed their profile picture. | 18:32:35 |
| katin changed their profile picture. | 18:32:48 |
| katin changed their profile picture. | 18:33:15 |
| 23 Jul 2024 |
|  Punit Arya left the room. | 04:33:32 |
|  Darius Tarog left the room. | 04:51:54 |
 foobar | In reply to @ifiguero:matrix.org
You can run as many windows servers VMs as you want. Licencewise I have no idea what is the current model. I know there is some windows server datacenter that allows unlimited guest I guess. But I don't know how the standard works oracle style per physical core or CAL licenses iirc | 23:11:39 |
|  luna changed their profile picture. | 23:18:26 |
| luna changed their profile picture. | 23:19:42 |
| 24 Jul 2024 |
|  Myned joined the room. | 04:42:49 |
|  dory changed their profile picture. | 08:07:18 |
|  jack joined the room. | 10:32:10 |
 Mario | Hello. Does anyone have an experience with integrating Azure SSO (SAML2) into SaaS application? Context: Our clients are only business customers, some of them have local auth access on app, but we also for some enterprises provide SSO Azure login for which they have to configure application on their tenant and they provide config parameters to us. Is it possible to implement multi-organization setup but on single domain? In current setup, for all different clients we configure separate subdomains which are used to forward auth to correct identity provider URL. I'm wondering if there is a way to correctly relay login requests to azure from a single domain, independent on which organizations user is trying to authenticate. | 14:19:37 |
| 25 Jul 2024 |
 SERP!CO | you may consider using subdomains with multipart stem domains | 00:16:45 |
|  ᥫ᭡ 𐑖ミꪜᴵ𝔦 ᥫ᭡ set a profile picture. | 07:55:15 |
| ᥫ᭡ 𐑖ミꪜᴵ𝔦 ᥫ᭡ changed their profile picture. | 22:10:12 |
