| 22 Apr 2024 |
 effendy | Yes, I can see now I can specifically choose IPP. But yeah, I'll also have to rely on the fact that the printer actually does multicast. If not, finding out the IP would be a pain (because of the remote thing/not connecting over any remote control solutions like teamviewer/anydesk). | 15:01:06 |
| effendy | And if he could just get an utp cable... that would also make things much easier instead of trying to type in the wifi password on the printer 🤕 | 15:02:28 |
| effendy | Assuming he could find a room near the router (argghh!) | 15:02:55 |
 iam_tj | does the printer not do WPS? | 15:03:14 |
| iam_tj | if so it should just be a button-press on AP and printer | 15:03:40 |
| effendy | So you'd expect the router to have WPS enabled too, right? | 15:04:50 |
| effendy | I've searched the manual and WPS is mentioned on a template-sheet in the Fax Function section :D | 15:05:16 |
| effendy | That's a good hint in any case. | 15:06:09 |
| iam_tj | there's usually a button on the AP to trigger WPS for a short period | 15:09:57 |
| effendy | Yeah, I'd to find out if it's possible to do it on the printer (and how!) | 15:21:17 |
| effendy | * Yeah, I'd have to find out if it's possible to do it on the printer (and how!) | 17:23:53 |
|  strawberry (it/pup/she/they) 🏳️⚧️ 🦴💜🩷 changed their profile picture. | 22:50:13 |
| 23 Apr 2024 |
|  Sluffer set a profile picture. | 01:29:10 |
|  Leandro joined the room. | 20:45:38 |
|  Xanti / Alexandria changed their display name from Xanti / Alexandria (she/they) to Xanti / Alexandria. | 21:53:15 |
| 24 Apr 2024 |
|  eve joined the room. | 03:20:45 |
 c0re | In reply to @effendy:matrix.org
So you'd expect the router to have WPS enabled too, right? depending on your routers' WiFi 802.11 standard you might run into issues there as well... speaking from experience. A wired connection of sorts would be the best bet. And I also concur with other to offload the actual communication towards the printer to a CUPS server | 06:59:26 |
| c0re | In reply to @effendy:matrix.org
So you'd expect the router to have WPS enabled too, right? * depending on your routers' WiFi 802.11 standard you might run into issues there as well... speaking from experience. A wired connection of sorts would be the best bet. And I also concur with the others to offload the actual communication towards the printer to a CUPS server | 06:59:40 |
| effendy | c0re: a cups server is not a solution in this case unfortunately because of the circumstances described above. It would be easier for him to buy a new printer then that would hopefully last, I don't know, maybe at least another 7 years. | 09:44:07 |
| effendy | But, yes, that's the point, it would be a shame to throw it away given that it's a perfectly functional printer. | 09:44:32 |
| effendy | It's not really about the costs. | 09:44:38 |
| iam_tj | effendy: every host has a CUPS server; don't get confused by the terminology. Every CUPS server serves for localhost but can also share more widely if the per-queue share options are set | 11:45:05 |
| effendy | iam_tj: I don't think I'm confused about the terminology. I just don't understand how it would solve my problem here given the context with this friend who is not knowledgeable. Doesn't c0re suggest using a separate host (for instance an old computer) on which the printer's driver are installed? | 13:57:27 |
| iam_tj | hmmm, possibly ... I was thinking in terms of CUPS/IPP vs dedicated-printer-driver | 14:42:03 |
| effendy | Right :) | 16:54:19 |
|  @ailunarenth:tchncs.de left the room. | 19:12:37 |
|  alec changed their profile picture. | 22:18:41 |
| 25 Apr 2024 |
|  A changed their display name from name to A. | 10:47:29 |
| A | On Kali:
- John the Ripper
- Hydra
- Cain & Abel
- Ophcrack
- Hashcat
https://www.infosecinstitute.com/resources/penetration-testing/kali-linux-top-5-tools-for-password-attacks/
- Which is the most suitable to crack .aes encryption?
| 12:32:54 |
 UltraBlack_ | does anyone have experience with proxmox backup server? I wanna set it up as a network-wide backup server using the proxmox backup client, but I'm just now realizing that while it has deduplication, it seemingly only deduplicates on the server, meaning that most time is spent uploading, even if only a few files have changed. Any idea if there is a way to make the clients only upload changes? | 18:08:04 |
