| 24 Sep 2023 |
 deadcade | In reply to @nerohd:matrix.org
I just wanted a fast answer I guess, the good thing it did translate for me today a denojs script to rust perfectrly and I had that 1000x boost with no pain If you are able to verify its output, that is. AI does not have any understanding of its input or output, and can get details wrong that might lead to unexpected results. | 10:35:31 |
 nerohd | ofc its jsut a tool | 10:35:47 |
| nerohd | * ofc its just a tool | 10:35:50 |
| nerohd | there is nothing comparable to the wiki in fedora land | 10:36:40 |
| nerohd | good thing the arch ppl have us covered | 10:36:55 |
|  @adminx01:matrix.org left the room. | 10:38:09 |
| nerohd | rules for specifc action require and ID, I just want to add a rule for an executable I compiled, I'll try to find this in polikit docs then add this to the wiki + reference | 10:42:37 |
| nerohd | * rules for specifc action require and ID, I just want to add a rule for an executable I compiled (so no id just path), I'll try to find this in polikit docs then add this to the wiki + reference | 10:42:48 |
 smolsheep | the polkit package on arch comes with pkexec, which also comes with policy. If you aren't using arch, that's entirely a you problem. | 10:45:23 |
| nerohd | I'm not sure how is that relates to what I said | 10:46:18 |
| smolsheep | Arch comes with policy for these things. If you aren't using arch, that's a problem between you and whatever you're using. | 10:49:24 |
| nerohd | I'm writing a rule for a custom program I made , arch policy are unreleated | 10:50:10 |
| nerohd | anyhow thanks turns out rules are just javascript | 10:50:26 |
| nerohd | and it works fine now | 10:50:29 |
| nerohd | I did some reverse engeering with polkit.log | 10:50:39 |
| nerohd | * I did some reverse engeneering with polkit.log | 10:50:44 |
| nerohd | * I did some reverse engineering with polkit.log | 10:50:50 |
| smolsheep | if you're executing pkexec, the rule relates to pkexec. | 10:51:25 |
| nerohd | yes pkexec usage inside a program, so let me explain more | 10:52:02 |
 octarinesparkle | Hey everyone
What is the KDE settings module to manage Kwallet ? | 10:52:03 |
| nerohd | I have a complex program so I divided it into a small cores to be run with pkexec when needed and the frontend dont need root | 10:52:29 |
| nerohd | so I'll just add rules that describe such relations | 10:52:47 |
 Dan Johansen | In reply to @octarinesparkle:matrix.org
Hey everyone
What is the KDE settings module to manage Kwallet ? I don't think there is a settings module (kcm), but there is kwalletmanager. | 10:53:34 |
| Dan Johansen | Which might provide the settings module, now that I look at the file list.' | 10:54:11 |
| octarinesparkle | It's exactly what I was looking for :) | 10:54:32 |
| octarinesparkle | Thanks a lot !! | 10:54:36 |
|  @neoabo:matrix.org left the room. | 11:01:25 |
|  Luna (she/they) changed their profile picture. | 11:01:41 |
| nerohd | In reply to @nerohd:matrix.org
I did some reverse engineering with polkit.log for completness sake, fedora like arch starts polkit service with --no-debug, it needs to be removed in order to see the debug log | 11:19:04 |
| nerohd | from there its easy to add whatever you want | 11:19:18 |
