7 Oct 2022 |
rutherford | <Aivilous@discord>:
π Hey! This is RSS3 team, an information dissemination protocol for Web3 with the core elements of feed and search.Β https://rss3.io
We believe we have a shared vision so weβd love to connect with you and maybe find a way to collaborate π
You can check out our current partners here:
https://ecosystem.rss3.ioΒ
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/rss3_
Mail mattw@rss3.io | 12:56:47 |
rutherford | <vlaflip@discord>:
elaborate on collaborate.. : ) | 13:01:15 |
joskye | Aivilious have you spoken to CryptoGuard @CryptoGuard:matrix.org | 17:18:58 |
joskye | Cryptoguard? | 17:19:06 |
10 Oct 2022 |
rutherford | <Aivilous@discord>:
Nope, should I DM him? | 09:52:50 |
crz | Redacted or Malformed Event | 11:39:04 |
rutherford | <The_real_dadon@telegram>:
I would Aivilous the entire team is all hands on deck rn with upcoming DEX release approaching but I'm sure if you DM him he will be with you asap π π | 13:38:03 |
11 Oct 2022 |
| N.K.Narula joined the room. | 20:33:22 |
20 Oct 2022 |
rutherford | <vlaflip@discord>:
we have applied for a us friendly listing on https://www.mexc.com/? | 16:39:00 |
rutherford | <vlaflip@discord>:
seems decent, quite big | 16:39:56 |
22 Oct 2022 |
| CryptoGuard changed their profile picture. | 02:51:18 |
| mbacoinin removed their display name mbacoinin. | 10:14:27 |
28 Oct 2022 |
| mbacoinin set their display name to mbacoinin. | 23:12:27 |
16 Nov 2022 |
| tecnovert set a profile picture. | 21:06:56 |
| tecnovert changed their profile picture. | 21:08:53 |
22 Nov 2022 |
rutherford | <charlybrown@discord>:
Will there be a feature for buyer and seller to get their money back if both agree that the transaction has failed because of the product not meeting the buyers expectations or something like that? | 22:13:49 |
rutherford | <charlybrown@discord>:
would be cool I guess. So the MAD sc gets triggered to return all funds to the senders if both check the box. Maybe a better option than having the funds locked for ever in the smart contract escorow? | 22:16:56 |
rutherford | <charlybrown@discord>:
buyer and seller could argue out a deal where the buyer sends the product back for example and after the seller gets his good(s) back they would both check the checkbox and get their funds back. | 22:19:01 |
rutherford | <charlybrown@discord>:
(Like nothing happened) | 22:19:41 |
23 Nov 2022 |
rutherford | <lbanquier@discord>:
Evolution idea to increase liquidity inside basicswap : allowing funds to stake while being in the basicswap orderbook | 17:33:21 |
joskye | Technically I think this should or at least could be possible but I'd like to know the answer. | 17:34:54 |
mbacoinin | @lbanquier IIRC everytime a UTXO stakes its non-movable for 100 blocks | 17:35:08 |
mbacoinin | * @lbanquier IIRC everytime a UTXO stakes its non-movable for 100 blocks or 225 | 17:35:32 |
mbacoinin | hmm need to check, but IIRC 100 blocks is for the maturity of the stake rewards (thus until then then they are unusable) and the 225 is for making the UTXO that staked those rewards usable again... but I could be wrong | 17:37:23 |
mbacoinin | * hmm need to check, but IIRC 100 blocks is for the maturity of the stake rewards (thus until then then they are unusable) and the 225 is for making the UTXO that staked those rewards usable again... I could be wrong ofcourse | 17:37:38 |
rutherford | <lbanquier@discord>:
Damn i am so sad | 17:42:46 |
rutherford | <lbanquier@discord>:
Would have been crazy to put all your funds inside basicswap at your sell price target while staking and to forget those funds until price is reached | 17:43:48 |
25 Nov 2022 |
| wisdomtooth77 joined the room. | 16:32:23 |
1 Dec 2022 |
| zaSmilingIdiot joined the room. | 10:28:13 |
4 Dec 2022 |
rutherford | <particlmike99@discord>:
could always do like half, to help support liquidity and price discovery | 22:38:20 |