| 3 Dec 2018 |
| 16:21:49 |  rutherford | <uuiuiuiuuuiu> i think we all know what the long term strategy is +- |
| 16:24:19 | rutherford | <B3N27> This is not important, the important thing was that they were there and probably that the guys listening to them had networks which could be interested by Particl. This is not a one man show where each guy has the same value, in this case only the qualitative aspect is interesting. And in all cases doing this kind of conférence are legitimizing the project and it can be shared to thousands of people on internet. |
| 5 Dec 2018 |
| 15:37:31 | rutherford | <Katelady> Just out of curiosity, would it be technically feasible to build a feature which automatically removes your listings when the Particl price per token goes bellow the range fluctation you are comfortable with? |
| 15:37:42 | rutherford | <Katelady> That would be really handy for sellers |
| 15:48:01 | rutherford | <uuiuiuiuuuiu> you have already payed for a listing and can decide to not accept the the escrow |
| 15:48:46 | rutherford | <uuiuiuiuuuiu> and then re-negotiate (which is a feature which should be implemented) |
| 16:11:33 | rutherford | <Katelady> yes, obviously that make sens |
| 6 Dec 2018 |
| 18:46:33 | rutherford | <lastovicca22> Wouldn't it be better if the marketplace allowed users to choose whether they see the prices in USD or part? That way with volatility it would be easier to determine an items price. So If the user chose usd then it would be converted to part at soon as the purchase is done and at that part market value . |
| 18:47:38 | rutherford | <lastovicca22> Not sure if that is already planned to be or is implemented but I think this would make the marketplace way more user friendly |
| 18:57:03 | rutherford | <dros> And where do you fix the price while it fluctuates against usd? |
| 19:00:20 | rutherford | <CryptoBeans> agreed, price-pegging is a difficult thing to do because you have to rely on an unreliable market's data. I used to want it to be a thing but now not so much. I plan to just sell stuff for a "fair price" in PART and accept that maybe sometimes it won't benefit me. |
| 19:23:08 | rutherford | <dros> One thing I could imagine is that the seller sets his fix price in part or fiat and the buyer somehow is seeing an infinite updated price against his preferenced one. |
| 19:38:33 |  dros | Better say sees an I finite updated price in the counter-currency. |
| 19:44:34 | rutherford | <uuiuiuiuuuiu> a fiat peg is a must for this project to have any chance of attracting large serious vendors |
| 19:44:46 | rutherford | <uuiuiuiuuuiu> nobody can take any risk when margins are low on products you sell |
| 20:50:39 | rutherford | <lastovicca22> Agree with uuiiuiuiu Fiat price pay can be pegged with largest exchange like coinbase. Not gonna hurt part it's just gonna translate to the amount of part based on market value |
| 20:51:38 | rutherford | <lastovicca22> Just makes it user friendly if people can choose how to see prices in part or USD maybe other major Fiats too |
| 21:02:33 | dros | I sense it would make a lot of sense to NOT make any proposals here anymore but instead on particl.community and just let the chat here. |
| 21:02:59 | dros | Https://particl.community |
| 7 Dec 2018 |
| 07:10:38 | rutherford | <Katelady> its hard to get people to move to another platform, subscribe and create an account |
| 07:10:52 | rutherford | <Katelady> the key word here is "convenience" |
| 07:11:13 | rutherford | <Katelady> but you are right dros, it would be much better |
| 11:59:07 | | dros changed the room topic to "Focused chat on Particl Proposals made on https://particl.community/c/general-discussion/proposals" from "Welcome to the Particl [PART] Community. This channel is a focused discussion on Particl Proposals.". |
| 21:38:57 | rutherford | <rouse> Or how about just still use part and just have the Preferred FIAT value as a default like:
This item costs: *20$* (1.32 PART) |
| 21:41:55 | rutherford | <rouse> Creating a new stable coin would be a hassle in itself to be fully legal. |
| 21:43:10 | rutherford | <rouse> If the seller/store could choose a dollar value as default price, then the PART amount for every item would be dynamic, and surely more user-friendly. |
| 21:52:42 | rutherford | <rouse> I think proposals should be disabled for submitting in GUI on mainnet before it has fundamental anti-spam measures taken. Also with disclaimers and and guidelines. I can write about this in the forum later this week. I have some ideas. |
| 21:54:07 | rutherford | <rouse> Or maybe I can make a well written proposal 😏 |
| 21:54:18 | rutherford | <rouse> And ask you to vote :D |
| 21:57:39 | rutherford | <Cryptoguard> Yes please write in the forum :) Much better to get structured discussions that don't get burried quickly by chatter (re @rutherford_bot:<rouse> I think proposals should be disabled for submitting in GUI on mainnet before it has fundamental anti-spam measures taken. Also with disclaimers and and guidelines. I can write about this in the forum later this week. I have some ideas.) |
