| 24 Jul 2024 |
 cwfitzgerald | Eh, tomorrow doesn't start until you go to sleep or commit to pulling an all nigher :) | 17:49:25 |
| cwfitzgerald | That's my spicy hot take | 17:49:30 |
 brucem | Wondering why image isn't getting updated by dependabot since it is still at 0.24 rather than 0.25 | 17:50:34 |
 ErichDonGubler | Might have been something we opted out of using one of its commands? 🤔 | 17:56:43 |
| 25 Jul 2024 |
|  satede joined the room. | 06:25:29 |
 Marijn | https://github.com/gfx-rs/wgpu/pull/6006 thanks teoxoy, that's some great timing there. I couldn't find my PR in the open PRs list, and definitely didn't recall seeing an email that it was already merged. | 09:18:00 |
| 26 Jul 2024 |
|  Zach joined the room. | 04:23:16 |
 wumpf | 🍿🍿🍿
https://github.com/gfx-rs/wgpu/pull/6052 | 07:49:33 |
| wumpf | I wonder what other bugs can be explained with this fix ... | 07:49:50 |
| wumpf | another great motivation for the degenerification work | 07:50:10 |
| wumpf | (just to clarify: I'm amused by this error but don't be stupid and see this as a finger pointing. This sort of thing happens all the time and illustrates why unsafe code is.. you know.. unsafe! any tiny lapse of attention and stuff like this happens) | 08:01:44 |
| wumpf | * (just to clarify: I'm oddly amused by this error but don't be stupid and see this as a finger pointing. This sort of thing happens all the time and illustrates why unsafe code is.. you know.. unsafe! any tiny lapse of attention and stuff like this happens) | 08:02:21 |
 groves | Oh I wonder if that's the same problem we were seeing about surface drop order | 14:25:05 |
| wumpf | surface drop order issue is exactly how I noticed this, so yes
Also after merging this PR I noticed that there was already a fix for it going in which had a typo (my Pr essentially fixes the typo) that made the error more subtle | 14:40:24 |
 kpreid | I hear you're planning a minor release. Is there a way to hear about what is planned to include in it? | 16:58:37 |
| kpreid | * I hear you're planning a minor release. Is there a way to see what changes are going in to it? | 16:58:52 |
| kpreid | (My interest is that I'd love to see https://github.com/gfx-rs/wgpu/pull/5987 to unblock my own getting to use the latest.) | 17:00:00 |
| kpreid | * (My interest is that I'd love to see https://github.com/gfx-rs/wgpu/pull/5987 to unblock my own getting to use the latest, but I first want to know if I even need to ask.) | 17:01:02 |
| cwfitzgerald | In reply to @kpreid:matrix.org
(My interest is that I'd love to see https://github.com/gfx-rs/wgpu/pull/5987 to unblock my own getting to use the latest, but I first want to know if I even need to ask.) Yeah that'll definitely be in it | 17:08:31 |
 teoxoy | In reply to @kpreid:matrix.org
I hear you're planning a minor release. Is there a way to see what changes are going in to it? All the PRs with the "needs backport" label. Or commits that already landed in the branch with the version name. | 17:09:40 |
| kpreid | Ah, I looked and missed the label... | 17:11:37 |
| teoxoy | Just added it :) | 17:11:51 |
| kpreid | There isn't a v22.0.1 branch now, but presumably there will be soon. | 17:11:53 |
| teoxoy | I think we'll still use the v22 one, at least that's how it has been so far (one branch per major version). | 17:13:16 |
| kpreid | Then perhaps it could be namedv22 instead of v22.0.0, for clarity? | 17:13:57 |
| kpreid | * Then perhaps it could be named v22 instead of v22.0.0, for clarity? | 17:14:09 |
| teoxoy | Yeah, I don't know why that one is named like that. cc @erichdongubler-mozilla:mozilla.org | 17:14:48 |
| ErichDonGubler | Oh, v22.0.0 is a leftover from the PR branch I created for the v22.0.0 release. I actually have a v22 branch locally, but apparently I never pushed it up? 🤔 | 17:25:28 |
| ErichDonGubler | Just deleted the v22.0.0 branch (but not the tag of the same name) and pushed a v22 branch with the same commit. | 17:26:43 |
| ErichDonGubler | Sorry for the confusion! | 17:26:52 |
