| 31 Jan 2023 |
 baba | how can i test that both servers are working? | 21:32:02 |
| baba | trafficif pass through two different servers? | 21:32:16 |
 madamada | the DNS part is done on the client side only | 21:32:42 |
| madamada | so once u set your DNS server(s), go to ipleaks.net to verify | 21:33:06 |
| madamada | or u could run Wireshark on the client | 21:33:29 |
| baba | you mean ip will be of endpoint only DNS will be changed in multihope? | 21:33:51 |
| madamada | yeh | 21:34:02 |
| baba | ok | 21:34:07 |
| baba | got it | 21:34:10 |
| baba | thankyou | 21:34:12 |
| baba | I think I should go for Official Mullvad client | 21:34:28 |
| baba | that is also opensource | 21:34:37 |
| baba | what do you suggest? | 21:34:59 |
| madamada | it's mostly personal preference, some use Mullvad app some use Wireguard app | 21:35:10 |
| madamada | since u have a multihop setup, better to go with Mullvad app since it's already preset | 21:35:40 |
| baba | mullvad app does support multihop itself? | 21:39:26 |
| baba | in official client? | 21:39:39 |
| madamada | I'm not sure about Mullvad | 21:40:57 |
| madamada | if they support it on their website then on the app as well | 21:41:18 |
| baba | In reply to @madamada:matrix.org
if they support it on their website then on the app as well they support in website for wireguard conf file when I want to download. there is option for it | 21:45:02 |
| madamada | yeah then it's preset for you so you can just import the config into Wireguard app | 21:45:50 |
| baba | ok | 21:58:44 |
| 2 Feb 2023 |
|  pabe left the room. | 08:08:11 |
|  Dyo changed their profile picture. | 08:09:08 |
|  Tristan B. Velloza Kildaire changed their profile picture. | 19:18:13 |
| Tristan B. Velloza Kildaire changed their profile picture. | 19:19:13 |
| Tristan B. Velloza Kildaire changed their profile picture. | 19:20:27 |
| Tristan B. Velloza Kildaire changed their profile picture. | 20:00:17 |
 kriansa | hey all. This question might have been answered but I'm having a hard time looking for it. I'd appreciate if anyone could point me to the right direction.
I want to establish a tunnel between two peers, but in one of them I will just run a SSH server, so this peer should not be able to initiate a connection to the other peer directly. Yet, I would like to still ensure that traffic sent to it via wg gets back at the same interface.
Right now I'm trying to use Table = off so wg-quick doesn't add routes for it, but then it is unable to respond to packets coming from wg0 and it requires me to add at least a route corresponding to the subnet sending that packet.
Is there any way I could simply tell this specific peer to "accept and respond every packet from wg0 on wg0"?
| 22:34:29 |
|  spicybits left the room. | 23:01:01 |
