| 11 Oct 2021 |
|  jagster247 joined the room. | 14:34:02 |
| 12 Oct 2021 |
|  redears joined the room. | 01:16:41 |
| 14 Oct 2021 |
 beka | Redacted or Malformed Event | 10:59:46 |
| beka | * Wrong windows | 11:00:11 |
| 15 Oct 2021 |
|  Viktor joined the room. | 10:41:06 |
| 16 Oct 2021 |
|  btcxmr joined the room. | 15:17:40 |
|  Justin left the room. | 19:31:54 |
| 17 Oct 2021 |
|  @raman132:matrix.org joined the room. | 21:13:14 |
| @raman132:matrix.org left the room. | 21:20:17 |
|  Sanguine joined the room. | 23:21:53 |
| 18 Oct 2021 |
|  paul-beyer joined the room. | 02:27:10 |
| paul-beyer | Is it possible that two Site-toSite VPNs are not able to be active at the same time? Or is there something that I can do wrong to get this result? I am working with Wireguard as a OpnSense Plugin and there are three Sites to be connected. | 13:48:13 |
| Sanguine changed their display name from Allan Kelly to Sanguine . | 15:01:16 |
 Xanarin | In reply to @paul-beyer:matrix.org
Is it possible that two Site-toSite VPNs are not able to be active at the same time? Or is there something that I can do wrong to get this result? I am working with Wireguard as a OpnSense Plugin and there are three Sites to be connected. Wireguard (at least on Linux) is able to hold open many connections simultaneously and successfully. Perhaps the issue you're experiencing is due to routing? | 15:20:09 |
| paul-beyer | The OpnSense does the routing with its default settings. So it remains a mystery why the two S2S VPN connections don't work at the same time for me. I can establish any number of individual connections to my router at the same time. | 15:29:40 |
| Xanarin | Is it a fully-connected mesh between the three nodes or is one node routing traffic between the other two nodes? | 15:31:02 |
| paul-beyer | I have a S2S connection from Site A to Site B and one from Site A to Site C. And i have some more connections from single Computers to Site A. Everything works but the two S2S Connections do not work at the same time. | 15:33:25 |
| Xanarin | What do you have set for the AllowedIPs field for each connection? | 15:39:44 |
| paul-beyer | Site B to Site A: 10.0.0.0/24 (tunnel) and four vlans on Site A Site C to Site A: 10.0.3.0/24 (tunnel) and also four vlans | 15:51:32 |
| paul-beyer | If I deactivate A-C then A-B is working. If I deactivate A-B and activate A-C then the other connection ist working. If i activate both, both are not working. | 15:59:21 |
| Xanarin | Did you generate unique private keys for B and C? | 15:59:56 |
| paul-beyer | yes I did | 16:00:13 |
| paul-beyer | but it is a few weeks ago, I check it again... | 16:01:08 |
| paul-beyer | they are different | 16:05:22 |
| paul-beyer | If I understand you well, it should work. So I will create a completely new configuration with newly generated keys and new tunnel addresses. Maybe that will help. | 16:10:43 |
| Xanarin | Yeah, I would certainly expect it to work. It may be worth doing a packet capture and putting it in Wireshark. You obviously won't be able to see the encrypted traffic, but it may be helpful to see how the control packets change when you connect both tunnels simultaneously. | 16:28:59 |
| Xanarin | I was recently surprised to find that Wireshark has surprisingly good support for Wireguard | 16:29:23 |
|  actsan joined the room. | 20:56:43 |
| 19 Oct 2021 |
|  play$solar$roulette changed their display name from apalumbo to play$solar$roulette. | 03:20:34 |
|  bnjbvr left the room. | 18:31:01 |
